Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Lakshmi Energy and Foods Ltd. Vs.reserve Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 W.P.(C) 5555/2018 and C.M. Nos. 21660/2018, 27625- 27626/2018, 28418/2018, 32776-32778/2018 & 32780/2018 M/S LAKSHMI ENERGY AND FOODS LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr Kapil Sibal, Sr Adv with Mr Vivek Chib, Mr Vikramaditya and Mr Asif Ahmed, Mr Amrendra Mehta and Mr Himesh Thakur and Ms Pracheta Kar. :Mr H.S. Parihar and Mr Kuldeep S. Parihar for R-1/RBI. Mr Rajesh Kumar Gautam and Mr Aakash Sehrawat for R-2/PNB. Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Mr Diwakar Maheshwar, Mr Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr Naveen Hegde and Mr Bunmeet Singh for R-3/ICICI Bank. Mr R.S. Raju, Mr M. Chandra Sekhar and Ms Megha for R-5/Syndicate Bank. Mr Sumit Nagpal for Axis Bank. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia,...
Pranav Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4846/2018 Judgment delivered on:24.09.2018 PRANAV SHARMA versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS : Mr.G.D.Chotmurada, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State. ASI Kunji Lal, P.S.Hazrat Nizamuddin. Mr.R.C.Sharma, Adv. for R- JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32680/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.4846/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.556/2015 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Hazrat Nizamuddin.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes and Settlement Deed dated 16.07.2018 has been Crl.M.C.4846/2018 Page 1 of 2 executed between the parties. As per the Settlement Deed total amount of Rs.11,00,000 h...
Nhpc Ltd vs.hcc Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$-1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h September, 2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 42/2018 & I.A. No.11373/2018 NHPC LTD HCC LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.Piyush Sharma, Mr.Viplav Acharya, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rishi Agrawal, Mr.P.Lodha, Ms.Shruti Arora, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the appellant challenging the Interim Order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal restraining the appellant from invoking and encashing the Bank Guarantee No.20090041 BGP0050and/or other Bank Guarantee pursuant to the Letter of Invocation dated 09.06.2018 for the recovery of amount mentioned therein.2. The disputes in relation to the Contract Agreement No.NHPC/CC/KG-TURNKEY/02 dated 09.03.2009 for Civil Arb.A.(Comm.) No.42/2...
Mohd. Iqhlak vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09. 07.2018 Judgment delivered on:24. 09.2018 + Crl. A. No.1444/2012 MOHD. ALAM STATE Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate (DHLSC) with Mr.Saurabh Kumar, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State along with Inspector Sudhir Kumar, P.S. Shalimar Bagh. + Crl. A. No.144/2016 MOHD. IQHLAK ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate STATE versus (DHLSC) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State along with Inspector Sudhir Kumar, P.S. Shalimar Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Crl A Nos.1444/2012 & 144/2016 Page 1 of 27 VIPIN SANGHI, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeals have been filed by the appellants, namely, Mohd. Alam (Crl.A. 1444/2012) and Mohd. Iqhlak @ Asif (Crl.A. 144/2016) under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the common judgment of conviction dated 26.04.2012 rendered by the learned ASJ, Fast Tra...
Gurdeep Ruhela vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~43 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"24th September, 2018 BAIL APPL. 2236/2018 & CRL.M.A. 32810/2018 GURDEEP RUHELA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.N. Khanna & Mr. S.V. STATE Vats, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.936/2016 registered by police station Mukherjee Nagar was lodged on the complaint of mother of the prosecutrix on 03.12.2016 respecting the suspected kidnapping of her daughter, described to be 13 years old on 01.12.2016. Later suspicion about complicity of the petitioner was expressed. While the police was trying to trace the petitioner, and the prosecutrix girl, they approached the High Court of Allahabad by writ petition (civil) No.57874/2016 on 07.12.2016, inter alia, claiming that they were married to each other, the marriage having been solemnized at Prayag, Uttar Pradesh on 04.12.2016. The High Court directed th...
Suryakant Sandibigraha & Anr. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on :14. h August, 2018 Judgment delivered on:24. h September, 2018 + BAIL APPLN. 494/2018 SURYAKANT SANDIBIGRAHA & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent : Mr. Lalit Choudhary, Ms. Priya Sharma and Mr. Jaskirat Narula, Advs. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Samar Pal, Cyber/EOW Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Mr. Sagar Roy, Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advs. For the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.17 of 2017 under Sections 408/419/420/467/468/471/447A/120B/34 of the IPC and Section 66 (C) (D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station EOW Wing.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had opened a proprietorship concern fo...
Kanchi Tamang vs.state of g.n.c.t of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h January, 2018 Decided on:24. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 912/2016 KANCHI TAMANG .....Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Mr.Harshit Jain, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Rupali Samuel Advocates. versus STATE OF G.N.C.T OF DELHI .....Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP with SI Navdeep PS Kamla Market. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this appeal, appellant Kanchi Tamang challenges the impugned judgment dated 29th August 2016 convicting her for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (in short ITP Act) and the order on sentence dated 2nd September 2016 directing her to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of 2,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the property situated at Kotha No.59, Second Floor, R...
Zile Singh vs.bhim Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h September, 2018. RSA122012 & CM No.1645/2012 (for stay) ZILE SINGH Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Adv. ..... Appellant BHIM SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankit Jain with Mr. Sarvesh Rai Versus and Mr. Siddhant Nath, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 25th November, 2011 in RCA No.2of the Court of Senior Civil Judge (Central)]. partly allowing the First Appeal preferred by the respondents/plaintiffs against the judgment and decree [dated 30th May, 2000 in Suit No.M-of the Court of Civil Judge, Delhi]. of dismissal of the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 27th January, 2012 when albeit without expressing satisfaction that the same entails any substantial question of law and without framing any substantial ques...
Suresh & Anr. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
Judgment delivered on:24.09.2018 CRL.M.C. 2784/2018 $~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + SURESH & ANR. versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Braham Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, APP. Mr.Raghav Chaddha, Advocate for R-2 with Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, AR of R-2. SI Sunil Kumar, P.S.Govind Puri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2409.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1397/2014 under Section 379 of the IPC and Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Govind Puri, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioners where direct theft was found. A direct theft bill of Rs.50,804/- was raised. Thereafter petitioner approached the respondents and the parties had settled th...
Ravinder Sabharwal and Anr. Vs.xad Inc. And Orrs.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :7. h August, 2018 Date of Decision:24. h September, 2018 CS (COMM) 1057/2018 & CAVs 697/2018, 698/2018, I.As. 10222/2018, 10223/2018, 10224/2018, 10225/2018 RAVINDER SABHARWAL AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Anuj Berry, Mr. Abhay J.V., Mr. Malak Bhatt, Ms. Apoorva Murali & Ms. Kruttika Vijay, Advocates (M-9871792740) versus XAD INC. AND ORRS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aananya Kumar, Mr. Manish Jha, Ms. Pragya Chuahan, Ms. Megha Kapoor, Advocates for D- 1 to 3 (M-9910627489). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction against the Defendants from conducting an Extraordinary General Meeting (hereinafter EGM) for removing the Plaintiffs. Plaintiff No.1 Sh. Ravinder Sabharwal is a Director of XAD Software Pvt. Ltd. and was also the nominee share holder of 50% of the sha...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »