Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Queens Fairmont vs.satish Kumar Mishra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~1 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h September, 2018 + + SATISH KUMAR MISHRA ARB.P. 34/2013 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Hitendra Kumar Nahata & Ms. (M- Advocates Ritu Jain, 9910290400). MEGHA SINGH versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Mund, Mr. Bharat Bhushan & Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advocates (M- 9650273107). QUEENS FAIRMONT AND CS(OS) 3019/2014 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sunil Mund, Mr. Bharat Bhushan & Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advocates (M- 9650273107). SATISH KUMAR MISHRA & ANR versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Hitendra Kumar Nahata & Ms. (M- Advocates Jain, Ritu 9910290400). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) ARB.P. 34/2013 & CRL.M.A. 12644/2018, I.As. 4704/2015, 6663/2015, 13107/2018 1. The present arbitration petition 34/2013 has been filed seeking reference to arbitration of disputes between the parties in respect of an agreement dated 19th January, 2011 containing the following clause: That in case of any disputes...
Surender Kumar Pandey @ Surendera Kumar & Anr. Vs.the State (Nct of De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2018 CRL.M.C. 4894/2018 SURENDER KUMAR PANDEY @ SURENDERA KUMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Anil Kumar Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. JUDGMENT2509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.7 of 2017 under Section 354- A/509/323 of the IPC registered at Police Station C.R. Park, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner a Pujari was fighting with another Pujari and when the complainant sought to intervene, he misbehaved with her and slapped her.3. The petitioners are present in Court in person. They regret and CRL.M.C. 4894/2018 Page 1 of ...
Gagan Kumar Goel & Anr. Vs.bar Council of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~51. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5032018 GAGAN KUMAR GOEL & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms.Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Adv. Versus BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr.Prang Newmai, Ms.Shomita Rai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO % ORDER2509.2018 Review Petition No.362/2018 (by the appellants) 1. Heard on the application seeking review of an order passed by this Court on 31st August, 2018 in the matter of rejecting the petitioners prayer for grant of interim relief so also dismissing the LPA No.305/2018 on account of the fact that the writ petition was pending consideration before the learned writ Court and at this stage no interim relief by way of admission to the petitioner can be granted, this application has been filed for review/recall.2. Having considered the submissions made, we find no case made out for review or recall of the order passed. The writ petition i...
Kanhya Lal vs.estate Officer, Directorate of Estate & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h September, 2018. W.P.(C) 11635/2016 & CM No.45855/2016 (for stay) KANHYA LAL Through: Mr. R.P. Parashar, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus ESTATE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF ESTATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna and Mr. Akhilesh, Advs. with Mr. Harvesh Kumar, Asstt. Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 7th October, 2016 in PPA No.90/2015 of the Court of District Judge, New Delhi acting as the Appellate Officer under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. of dismissal of appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 1st October, 2015 of the respondent No.1 Estate Officer in exercise of powers under Section 5 of the PP Act of eviction of the petitioner from government quarter No.45K, Sector-4, D.I.Z. Area i.e. Gol Market, New Delhi.2. T...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd vs.gaurav Swaroop & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) + MAC.APP. 154/2017 Date of Decision: September 25, 2018 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus GAURAV SWAROOP & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kunwerpal Singh, Advocate (ii) + MAC.APP. 500/2018 GAURAV SWAROOP ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kunwerpal Singh, Advocate Versus SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. (ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS (iii) + MAC.APP. 161/2017 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus NADEEM CHAUDHRY & ORS. Through: Mr. Kunwerpal Singh, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS * MAC.APP. 161/2017 MAC.APP. 752/2018 MAC.APP. 154/2017 MAC.APP. 500/2018 Page 1 of 11 (iv) + MAC.APP. 752/2018 1. NADEEM CHAUDHRY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kunwerpal Singh, Advocate Versus SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ( ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate .....
Romila Bahl & Anr vs.indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 25th September, 2018. W.P.(C) 4560/2018 & CM No.17699/2018 (for stay) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. GIFT CENTRE (KHUSHAL) INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. + W.P.(C) 4768/2018 & CMs No.18418/2018 (for stay) & Versus AND * % + + 18419/2018 (for exemption) ........ Petitioner Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. M. A. RAMZANA INDIAN TOURISM DEVEOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. W.P.(C) 5778/2018 & CM No.22525/2018 (for stay) Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. AND ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saraswata Mohapatra, Adv. ROMILA BAHL & ANR INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 These three petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugn the orders [(i) dated 14th March, 2018 ...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 7 vs.reebok India Company
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL11302017 Date of decision:25. h September, 2018 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amar and Mr. Aditya Khamparia, Advocates. versus REEBOK INDIA COMPANY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Jain and Mr. Aniket D. Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the case of Reebok India Company relates to the Assessment Year 2011-12 and arises from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in ITA No.954/Del/2016.2. The present appeal raises only one question/issue which relates to disallowance of part interest paid on unsecured loans of Rs.502.69 crores as the respondent-assessee had advanced Rs.172.59 crores to third parties on which no interest was charged and recei...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs.m/s H S Construction Co
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~83 to 85 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of judgment:25. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 175/2018 and CM No.32193/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Ajaylal Singh, Mr.VikalpMudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates versus M/S GAURAV ENTERPRISE .....Respondent Through: Dr.Anurag Kumar Agarwal and Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocates FAO(OS) (COMM) 180/2018 and CM No.32639/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Ajaylal Singh, Mr.VikalpMudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates M/S H S CONSTRUCTION CO versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia and Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocates + FAO(OS) (COMM) 181/2018 and CM No.32645/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Ajaylal Singh, Mr.VikalpMudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates M/S H S CONSTRUCTION CO versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhu...
Indu Jain & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3700/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15476/2016 & 1068/2017 INDU JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3801/2016 & CRL.M.A. 15911/2016, 1066/2017, 8442/2017 SAMIR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Mr. Manish Shukla, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. R2 in person. + Crl.M.C. 3700/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 15 + CRL.M.C. 817/2017 & CRL.M.A. 3452/2017 DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo with Mr. Yoginder Ha...
Ashok Kumar Sehghal & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:06. h September, 2018 Judgment delivered on:24. h September, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2199/2013 ASHOK KUMAR SEHGHAL & ANR. versus STATE & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent : Mr Ashok Kumar Arya and Mr. Shivam, Advocates. Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Devi Lal, P.S.Maurya Enclave. Mr. Binod Kr. Aggarwal and Ms. Richa, Advs. for R-2 & 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.107/2012 under Sections 454/380/341/120B/34 of the IPC, Police Station Maurya Enclave.2. FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent No.2 who contended that he had purchased the second-floor rights from one Smt. Nirmal Saraf. The petitioners were owners of the first floor of the said property. They had sold the second-floor rights to Smt. Nirmal Saraf who in turn sold it t...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »