Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ericsson India Private Ltd. Vs.additional Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 7435/2015 ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.M. S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr.Mayank Nagi & Mr.Tarun Singh, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) The petitioners grievance is that the penalty imposed under 1. Section 271G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) was illegal because the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) did not possess the requisite jurisdiction, when he issued first show-cause notice dated 30.04.2014 upon the default of the notice dated 18.02.2014, requiring the petitioner/assessee to produce the relevant documents under Section 92D(3) of the Act. The time given for this purpose was till 25.03.2014. It is therefore submitted that the default, W.P.(C) 7435/2015 Page 1 of 7 if an...
Harshit Promoters pvt.ltd. Vs.icri Research Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~CP-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:25. 09.2018 + CO.PET. 896/2015 HARSHIT PROMOTERS PVT.LTD. Through Mr.Rajiv K Garg, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ICRI RESEARCH PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through Mr.Sunil Chaudhary, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under Sections 433(e) and 434(f) of the 1. Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent Company.2. The case of the petitioner is that on 16.06.2008 in the normal course of its business, the petitioner provided Inter-Corporate Deposit of Rs.75 lakhs to the respondents subject to interest @ 18% p.a. and repayable within a period of 90 days. To secure the interest of the petitioner, respondent Nos.4 & 5 executed a promissory note for Rs.75 lakhs as well as handed over Post Dated Cheque (PDC) dated 13.09.2008 for the aforesaid amount of Rs.75 lakhs. The respondents also handed over a cheque dated 14.06.2008 for a sum of Rs.2,46,303/...
Ajay Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4893/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2018 AJAY SHARMA & ORS. THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Ram Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma,, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Yogender Singh Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.535 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that parties have entered into a settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, CRL.M.C. 4893/2018 Page 1 of 3 Karkardooma Courts, Delhi on 17.06.2016. Parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of ...
Walldorf Integration Solutions Limited (Formerly Known as Citixsys Tec ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 318/2018 & I.A. No.9851/2018 (Stay) + O.M.P. (COMM) 319/2018 & I.A. No.9852/2018 (Stay) Reserved on:20. h August, 2018 Date of decision:25. h September, 2018 KAMAL KARMAKAR WALLDORF INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CITIXSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED) ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nikhil Singhvi, Mr.Kanak Bose and Ms.Nikita Pandey, Advs. versus S CHAND AND COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through Ms.Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr.Krishna Keshav and Ms.Monica Saini, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 28.03.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators. The Arbitral Tribunal, by its Impugned Award has held that Walldorf Integration Solutions Limited (formerly know...
Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs.jagdish Parihar & Anr. (National Insurance Co Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 25, 2018 + MAC.APP. 159/2018 + MAC.APP. 160/2018 + MAC.APP. 161/2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. MANOJ KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jitender Kamra, Advocate + MAC.APP. 859/2018 .....Appellant 1. MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Jitender Kamra, Advocate versus JAGDISH PARIHAR & ANR. (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and .....Respondents Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned four appeals arise out of impugned Award of 7th October, 2017, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of MAC.APP. 159/2018, 160/2018, 161/2018 & 859/2018 Page 1 of 8 51,72,000/-(rounded of) with interest @ 9% p.a. to legal heirs of Surendra, Head Constable in Delhi Police, a...
M. A. Ramzana vs.indian Tourism Deveopment Corporation Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 25th September, 2018. W.P.(C) 4560/2018 & CM No.17699/2018 (for stay) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. GIFT CENTRE (KHUSHAL) INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. + W.P.(C) 4768/2018 & CMs No.18418/2018 (for stay) & Versus AND * % + + 18419/2018 (for exemption) ........ Petitioner Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. M. A. RAMZANA INDIAN TOURISM DEVEOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. W.P.(C) 5778/2018 & CM No.22525/2018 (for stay) Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. AND ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saraswata Mohapatra, Adv. ROMILA BAHL & ANR INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 These three petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugn the orders [(i) dated 14th March, 2018 ...
Narender Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~68 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:25. h September, 2018 + W.P.(C) 925/2018 NARENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocates. versus CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate. Mr. Sachin Nawani, Advocate for LAC. Mr. Pawan Kawrani & Mr. Akshay Bhasin, Advocates for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra no.(04-16) admeasuring 4 bigha 16 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Mubarakpur Dabas, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Tr...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs.m/s Gaurav Enterprise
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~83 to 85 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of judgment:25. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 175/2018 and CM No.32193/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Ajaylal Singh, Mr.VikalpMudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates versus M/S GAURAV ENTERPRISE .....Respondent Through: Dr.Anurag Kumar Agarwal and Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocates FAO(OS) (COMM) 180/2018 and CM No.32639/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Ajaylal Singh, Mr.VikalpMudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates M/S H S CONSTRUCTION CO versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia and Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocates + FAO(OS) (COMM) 181/2018 and CM No.32645/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr.Ajaylal Singh, Mr.VikalpMudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates M/S H S CONSTRUCTION CO versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhu...
Sandeep vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1615/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2018 SANDEEP versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Nitin Tittal, Advocate. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with the Investigating Officer. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks Regular Bail in FIR No.1579/2015 under Sections 304B/306/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Uttam Nagar.2. The allegations in the FIR are the petitioner, who is the husband, harassed the deceased on account of demand of dowry.... Petitioner has been in custody since 13.12.2015.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that there is a substantial improvement, from the version recorded with the police in the FIR, in the testimony before the Court. He submits that the pros...
Indian Potash Limited vs.m/s. Emmsons Gulf Dmcc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* + Through: Mr. Arvind Minocha, Adv. versus M/S. EMMSONS GULF DMCC IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 30/2018 & IA48622018(stay) Reserved on:6. h September, 2018 Date of decision :25th September, 2018 INDIAN POTASH LIMITED ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjeev Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Tejas Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 30th November, 2017 passed by the majority of the Arbitrators, awarding a sum of Rs.11,74,39,806/- in favour of the respondent alongwith interest @12% per annum from 8th December, 2011 to 30th November, 2017 and further directing that if the awarded sum is not paid within one month from the date of the Award, the petitioner shall pay interest @18% per annum from the date of the Award till the date of payment.2. The disputes bet...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »