Delhi Court September 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4753/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2018 GOPAL KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Sanchit Vashistha, Adv. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Omveer Singh Ms. Suman Sharma, Adv. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.525 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Nand Nagari, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have entered into a settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi on 30.10.2017. Parties have already been divorced by CRL.M.C. 4753/2018 Page 1 of 3 way of a decree of divorce by mutual ...
Kamal Karmakar vs.s Chand and Company Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 318/2018 & I.A. No.9851/2018 (Stay) + O.M.P. (COMM) 319/2018 & I.A. No.9852/2018 (Stay) Reserved on:20. h August, 2018 Date of decision:25. h September, 2018 KAMAL KARMAKAR WALLDORF INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CITIXSYS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED) ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nikhil Singhvi, Mr.Kanak Bose and Ms.Nikita Pandey, Advs. versus S CHAND AND COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through Ms.Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr.Krishna Keshav and Ms.Monica Saini, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 28.03.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators. The Arbitral Tribunal, by its Impugned Award has held that Walldorf Integration Solutions Limited (formerly know...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.manoj Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 25, 2018 + MAC.APP. 159/2018 + MAC.APP. 160/2018 + MAC.APP. 161/2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. MANOJ KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jitender Kamra, Advocate + MAC.APP. 859/2018 .....Appellant 1. MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Jitender Kamra, Advocate versus JAGDISH PARIHAR & ANR. (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and .....Respondents Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned four appeals arise out of impugned Award of 7th October, 2017, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of MAC.APP. 159/2018, 160/2018, 161/2018 & 859/2018 Page 1 of 8 51,72,000/-(rounded of) with interest @ 9% p.a. to legal heirs of Surendra, Head Constable in Delhi Police, a...
Gift Centre (Khushal) vs.indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 25th September, 2018. W.P.(C) 4560/2018 & CM No.17699/2018 (for stay) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. GIFT CENTRE (KHUSHAL) INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. + W.P.(C) 4768/2018 & CMs No.18418/2018 (for stay) & Versus AND * % + + 18419/2018 (for exemption) ........ Petitioner Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. M. A. RAMZANA INDIAN TOURISM DEVEOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. W.P.(C) 5778/2018 & CM No.22525/2018 (for stay) Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. AND ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saraswata Mohapatra, Adv. ROMILA BAHL & ANR INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS Through: Mr. Deepak Thukral, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 These three petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugn the orders [(i) dated 14th March, 2018 ...
Imran vs.state ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1320/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2018 IMRAN ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Hari Parkash with Mr. Surender Kumar, Advocates. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Darshan, PS S.B. Dairy. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2509.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks Regular Bail in FIR No.151/2018 under Sections 376D/323/328/5IPC and Section 4 POCSO, Police Station Shahbad Dairy.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix was going in a lane when the petitioner, her neighbour, told her that her sister was being beaten by her husband and handed over his phone to her to talk to her sister. While she was in the process of talking, he pushed her in a room, wherein, a co-accused was present. Thereafter, it is alleged that the co-accused locked the room f...
State vs.maya Dahiya
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI STATE Decided on:25. h September, 2018 CRL.L.P. 683/2016 ....... Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with W/SI the Harjinder Kaur, PS NDRS Versus * % + MAYA DAHIYA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. M.M. Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.20290/2016 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 110 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 683/2016 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 27th May, 2016 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent Maya Dahiya for offence punishable under Section 325 IPC, the State has preferred the present leave petition.2. Process of law was set into motion on receipt of a complaint on 100 number wherein Ashu Verma stated that on 14th August, 2008, when she and Maya Dahiya (respondent herein) were travelling in ladies coach CRL.L.P. 683/2016 Page 1 of 5 ...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd vs.m/s Carrycon India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
$~82 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of judgment:25. h September, 2018 FAO (OS) (COMM) 163/2018 and CM No.30597/2018 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Mr. V. Mudgal, Ms. K. Gayatri and Mr. Pranav Sharma, Advocates versus M/S CARRYCON INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamakshi Singh and Mr. Parijat Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 13(2)of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015(hereinafter referred to as the Commercial Courts Act) is directed against the order dated 09.04.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in O.M.P (COMM) No.288/2016, whereby the objections to ...
Ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd. Vs.oswal Woolen Mills Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 495/2016 Reserved on:5. h September, 2018 Date of decision :25th September, 2018 NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Bharat Sangal, Ms.Babita Kushwaha, Ms.Deepika Kalia & Ms.Shristi Banerjee, Advs. OSWAL WOOLEN MILLS LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sakal Bhushan & Mr.Akash CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Jandial, Advs.1. By way of the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the petitioner challenges the Arbitral Award dated 08.07.2015 passed by the Majority of the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Power Purchase Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the PPA) dated 10.01.2011 executed between the parties.2. Government of India launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission with an objective to establish India as...
Smt. Meenakshi Aggarwal and Anr. Vs.gaon Sabha and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: September 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 10082/2018 & CMs 39311-13/2018 SMT. MEENAKSHI AGGARWAL AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Mr. Rajesh Singh and Mr. Sahil Agarwal, Advocates versus GAON SABHA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Niharika, Advocate for Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 31st August, 2018 rejects petitioners revision petition against conditional order (Annexure J-colly.) passed on 4th July, 2018 under Section 81 of The Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the DLR Act). Prior to passing of conditional order (Annexure J-colly), a Notice of 24th January, 2018 (Annexure F-colly.) under Section 81 of the DLR Act was served upon petitioners.2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in response to abovesaid Notice, petitioners had appeared before the concerned Revenue Assistant on 2nd July, 2018 and had sought tim...
National Agricultural Co Operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd ( ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 218/2018 and CM No.39478-39480/2018 Date of decision:25. h September, 2018 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CO OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD (NAFED) M/S BANACO OVERSEAS Through Mr. A. K. Thakur, Mr. R. K. versus Mishra and Mr. Rishi Raj, Advocates Through None ..... Appellant ..... Respondent $~50 * + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Limited (the Appellant, for short) under Section 37, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short A&C Act) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns the order dated 09.10.2017 dismissing OMP (Comm.) No.360/2017 filed by them challenging the award dated 24.05.2017.2. The appeal is belated and delayed by 270 days and hence, an application seeking condonation of...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »