Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sheetal Chauhan vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~52 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA1132018 SHEETAL CHAUHAN Through: Mr Yogesh Kumar Dahiya and Mr Joymoti Mize, Advocates. ..... Appellant Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % CM No.31726-27/2018(exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ORDER0808.2018 2. The application is disposed of. RSA1132018 & C.M. Nos.31725/2018 (for condonation of 80 days delay in filing the appeal) 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment [dated 31st January, 2018 in RCA No.77/2017, CNR No.DLST01-007644- 2017 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (South District) Saket Court Complex]. of dismissal of the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 1st August, 2017 in CS SCJ No.84336/2016 of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge (South)]. of dismissal as n...
Capital Land Builders Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.m/s Shaheed Memorial Society & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~51 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 822/2018 Date of Decision:08. 08. 2018 CAPITAL LAND BUILDERS PVT LTD & ORS ...Petitioners Through: Mr.Viraj Datar, Mr.Vineet Mr.Imran and Jhanjik Moulaey, Advocates M/S SHAHEED MEMORIAL SOCIETY & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Versus Through: Mr.Ashish Mohan, Adv for R-4 to 6 Mr. A.S. Singh, Adv for R-9 and 10 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.28884/2018 (Exemption) This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioner for exemption from filing certified copies of the annexures. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM(M) 822/2018 and CM No.2883/2018 1. The petition assails the impugned order dated 3.4.2018 of the learned ADJ-03,Patiala House Court, New CM(M) 822/2018 Page 1 of 19 Delhi in CS No.579whereby an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC filed by the defendant No.4 to 6 to the said suit arrayed on record as respondent no.4 to 6 to the present petition had been allowed.2. It has been submi...
Shweta Gulati & Anr. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :28. h May, 2018 Judgment delivered on:08. h August, 2018 + CRL.REV. P.195/2018 SHWETA GULATI & ANR. ........ Petitioners THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr Mukesh Kumar, APP. : Mr Vikram Dua with Mr Vinod Kumar SI Sanjeet Singh, PS Rajouri Garden CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioners impugn order dated 06.09.2017 passed by the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) as well as the order of the Appellate Court dated 21.02.2018 holding the victim girl to be a minor.2.... Petitioner No.1 is the employer of the minor victim K and is a co-accused along with her husband in FIR No.896/2016, Police Station Rajouri Garden under SectionsIPC and Section 6 POCSO read with Section 75 Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as J.J.Act, 2015) 3. ...
Faris Shuja Jalali @ Anup vs.the Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 09, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: August 08, 2018 + CRL.A. 951/2015 ANAND VISHWA @ BISHWA ..... Appellant THE CBI Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Vikram with Ms. Vasundara Chauhan, Advs. Versus Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 684/2016 Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Adv. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Adv. Versus ANAND VISHWA @ BISHWA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Vikram with Ms. Vasundara Chauhan, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Jivesh Tiwari with Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. for R-2. CRL.A. 1286/2014 + FARIS SHUJA JALALI @ ANUP ..... Appellant Mr. Jivesh Tiwari with Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. for R-2. Versus THE CBI Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Adv. Page 1 of 15 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide impugned judgment dated J...
Sunil Kumar Adlakha & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3989/2018 SUNIL KUMAR ADLAKHA & ORS ........ Petitioners STATE & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Gaurav Singh with Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI Sanju Rai Singh, CWC Nanak Pura. Ms. Shikha Tyagi, Advocate for R-2. JUDGMENT0808.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29579/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3989/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.73/2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Crime(Women) Cell Nanak Pura. CRL.M.C. 3989/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.3. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the father-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.3 is the brother-in-law...
Anand Vishwa @ Bishwa vs.the Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 09, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: August 08, 2018 + CRL.A. 951/2015 ANAND VISHWA @ BISHWA ..... Appellant THE CBI Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Vikram with Ms. Vasundara Chauhan, Advs. Versus Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 684/2016 Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Adv. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Adv. Versus ANAND VISHWA @ BISHWA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Vikram with Ms. Vasundara Chauhan, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Jivesh Tiwari with Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. for R-2. CRL.A. 1286/2014 + FARIS SHUJA JALALI @ ANUP ..... Appellant Mr. Jivesh Tiwari with Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. for R-2. Versus THE CBI Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Bhandari, Adv. Page 1 of 15 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide impugned judgment dated J...
Jaspreet Kaur vs.arun K Chatterjee, Chief Passport Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
#47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2018 CONT.CAS(C) 580/2018 JASPREET KAUR ........ Petitioner versus ARUN K CHATTERJEE, CHIEF PASSPORT OFFICER ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Harpreet Singh Popli, Mr. Mukul Giridhar, Mr. Anuj Yadav and Mr. Deepak Diwan, Advocates : Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Ahuja and Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.31201/2018 (Exemption) Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of accordingly. \ CONT.CAS.(C) 580/2018 Page 1 of 4 CONT.CAS.(C) 580/2018 1. The present petition under Section 2,10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner praying as follows:-"In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to: a) Hold the respondent guilt...
Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Saha vs.ombir Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:08. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 664/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2537/2015 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK KUMAR SAHA ....... Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Hingorani, Adv. versus OMBIR SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, APP for the State /R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The petitioner had approached the Metropolitan Magistrate with a complaint (CC-99/01/14) invoking the jurisdiction of the said court under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) read with Section 156 (3) Cr. PC to seek initiation of action against the first to fourth respondents herein alleging offences punishable under Sections 120B, 166, 166A, 177, 181, 182, 187, 193, 195, 196, 197, 198, 200, 211, 209, 210, 219, 465, 466, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed by them. His said complaint and prayer under Section 156(3) Cr. PC were dismissed by the Chief Metropolitan Magis...
Late Sh. Dinesh Kumar Jain (Through Legal Heir Sh. Ankit Jain) vs.prin ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.468/2018 & CM No.15412/2018 Date of decision:8. h August, 2018 LATE SH. DINESH KUMAR JAIN (THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. ANKIT JAIN) Through: Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate versus with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellant PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been filed by the legal heirs of Late Dinesh Kumar Jain.2. The appeal impugns the order dated 16.10.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.3612/Del/2016 and relates to Assessment Year 2011-2012.3. The impugned order upholds addition of Rs.27,33,333/- made by the Assessing Officer and affirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on account of unexplained cash deposits of Rs.82,00,000/- made on diff...
Harsh Mander & Anr. Vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :7. h August, 2018 Date of decision :8. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10498/2009 & CM APPL. 1837/2010 HARSH MANDER & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chaudhary Zia Ali Kabir, Ms. Pragya P Singh & Ms. Aditi Saxena, Advs. versus UOI & ORS. Through : Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC for UOI. ........ RESPONDENTSs Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Adv. + W.P.(C) 1630/2015 KARNIKA SAWHNEY ........ Petitioner Through : Mr BB Sawhney, Sr. Adv. with Indira Sawhney, Mr. Ms. Vaibhav Mishra, Yogendar Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Monika Arora, Adv. with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Adv. W.P.(C)Nos.10498/2009 & 1630/2015 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE A society that sees legislating ine...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »