Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Puneet Solanki & Anr. Vs.sapsi Electronics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. (MISC.) 8/2018 SH. PUNEET SOLANKI & ANR. ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Rohi Jain, Advocate. versus SAPSI ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. & ORS...... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr.Manoj K.Singh with Mr.Anurag, and Ms.Kanishka Prasad, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of time for making of the Award by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the alleged bayana receipt cum Agreement dated 2.11.2012. I have intentionally used the word alleged as the respondents dispute the genuineness of this document.2. The Arbitrator had entered upon the reference on 18.03.2017 and due to the refusal of the respondents to give consent for the extension of time after the exp...
Sandeep Singh Bhatia vs.the State Govt. Of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~7 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 2330/2015 & CRL.M.A. 8133/2015, 3371/2016 SANDEEP SINGH BHATIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Advocate (appearance not given) versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State with SI Vikram Singh, PS Rajouri Garden. Mr. Sonal Anand, Advocate with Sh. Aayush Sai, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On a complaint made by the second respondent (the first informant) the Station House Officer (SHO) of Police Station Rajouri Garden, West Delhi registered first information report (FIR) No.1373/2014 on 26.11.2014 to take up investigation into alleged offences punishable under Sections 468/466/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). It appears allegations have been made in the said FIR, inter alia, against the petitioner.2. By the petition at hand, prayer is made for this court to exercise its inherent power and jurisdi...
Union Public Service Commission vs.jitendra Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on -24.07.2018. Date of Decision-09.08.2018. + W.P.(C) 8311/2017 & C.M. No.24185/2017 (for stay) TRIBHUWAN KIRTI BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Harvinder Oberoi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Vikramditya Singh, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. + W.P.(C) 10443/2017 & C.M. Nos.22929/2018 (by respondent No.1 for directions), 42659/2017 (for stay) UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. versus DEEPTI BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rupinder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Varun Khanna & Mr.Anant Singh, Advs. for R-1. + W.P.(C) 1490/2018 & C.M. No.6126/2018 (for stay) UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. versus WP (C) No.8311/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 18 JITENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advs. for R-1....
Vishal @ Keshav Kakkar vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1571/2018 VISHAL @ KESHAV KAKKAR versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Jitendra Sethi and Mr.Hemant Gulati, Advs.. Ms.Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ranbir Singh, P.S.Prasad Nagar. Mr.Naveen Kumar, Adv. for the complainant. JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks bail in FIR No.84 of 2018 under Sections 308 of the IPC Police Station Prasad Nagar.... Petitioner has been in custody since 22.06.2018. The parties are neighbours living in the same neighbouring colonies.2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties. It is contended that the parties are known to each other and have settled their disputes.3. The complainant of the FIR is present. He consents that he has settled with the petitioner...
Tribhuwan Kirti Bhardwaj vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on -24.07.2018. Date of Decision-09.08.2018. + W.P.(C) 8311/2017 & C.M. No.24185/2017 (for stay) TRIBHUWAN KIRTI BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Harvinder Oberoi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Vikramditya Singh, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. + W.P.(C) 10443/2017 & C.M. Nos.22929/2018 (by respondent No.1 for directions), 42659/2017 (for stay) UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. versus DEEPTI BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rupinder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Varun Khanna & Mr.Anant Singh, Advs. for R-1. + W.P.(C) 1490/2018 & C.M. No.6126/2018 (for stay) UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. versus WP (C) No.8311/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 18 JITENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advs. for R-1....
Mr. Prashant Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3803/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 MR. PRASHANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Advocate. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with SI Kartar Singh, P.S.Bindapur. Ms.Meenakshi Rawat, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28980/2018(exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3803/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.716 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Bindapur, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 3803/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 18,40,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent No.2. Th...
Renu & Ors vs.shriram General Insurance Company Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 09, 2018 + MAC.APP. 253/2017 RENU & ORS Through: Mr. Mrinal Harsh Vardhan, .....Appellants versus Advocate SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. Mohd. Shakim, Advocates for respondent No.1-Insurer Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 + MAC.APP. 1026/2017 SHEELA SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate versus RENU & ORS Through: Mr. Mrinal Harsh Vardhan, .....Respondents Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. Mohd. Shakim, Advocates for respondent No.3-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER C.M.10095/2017 (delay) in MAC.APP. 253/2017 There is delay of 470 days in filing the accompanying appeal. MAC.APP.253/2017 & 1026/2017 Page 1 of 7 Upon hearing, I find that sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay stands condoned. The applica...
Gaon Sabha Samalka vs.sher Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.226/1998 + % GAON SABHA SAMALKA9h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. Through: versus SHER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajender Dutt and Mr. Somdutt Kaushik, Advocates for R-26. Mr. L.K.Singh and Ms. Saira Parveen, Advocates for R- 29(b). Mr. Abhilash Vashisht, Adv. for R-32. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908(CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.12.1997 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for declaration and injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiffs. By the impugned judgment and decree RFA No.226/1998 Page 1 of 9 respondents/plaintiffs have been granted declaration that they are the owners of the suit land which comprises of 32 bighas and 6 biswas of land in village Samalkha...
Baljeet Singh vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1487/2016 and Crl.M.A.18739/2017 BALJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Chauhar, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State with SI Avdesh, PS Vijay Vihar. Mr. S.S., Tomar, Adv. for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (RBT-117/1/14) styled as application under Section 156(3) of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) presented by the petitioner, the Metropolitan Magistrate by his order dated 22.06.2015 declined his request for investigation into allegations by police, inter alia, observing that the petitioner was in possession of the entire evidence, identity of the persons allegedly involved being also known to him. At the same time, he opted to take cognizance and called upon the petitioner to adduce evidence Crl. M.C. No.1487/2016 Page 1 of 3 pres...
Vijay Manchanda vs.vishal Gems & Jewels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 2959/2018 VIJAY MANCHANDA ........ Petitioner VISHAL GEMS & JEWELS PVT. LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Suhail Malik, Advocate. For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA None. JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The office report indicates that the respondents have been served. However, none appears for the respondents.2. The petitioner, by the present petition, seeks a direction to the trial court to adjudicate the complaint of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, expeditiously. CRL.M.C. 2959/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complaint was filed as far back as in the year 2014 and on 01.04.208 when the petition was listed before the trial court there was an abstinence call from the Bar Association and accordingly peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »