Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amod Kumar vs.state ( Nct ) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1626/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 AMOD KUMAR versus STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. B.S. Chaudhary, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvender Verma, APP for the State. SI S.K. Gupta, Spl. Staff North Mr. Rajesh Chhetri and Ms. Meenakshi Rawal with complainant in person. JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.117/2018 under Sections 4IPC, Police Station Lahori Gate.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner was the cashier and in charge of the cash of the complainant as an employee. It is alleged that, on 21.04.2018, the petitioner stole cash amounting to Rs.35 lakhs from the shop of the complainant and left BAIL APPLN. 1626/2018 Page 1 of 3 Delhi and went to his home town in Uttar Pradesh.3. Learne...
Rahul & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3567/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 RAHUL & ORS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)& ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms.Manisha Rawat, Advocate. Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State with ASI Jai Kishan, P.S.Mangolpuri Mr.Sunil Chaudhary, Adv.for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28125/2018(exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3567/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1748 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Mangolpuri, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 3567/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent No.2 besides certain ...
Sarvesh Agrawal vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1352017 Date of Judgment:9. h August, 2018 SARVESH AGRAWAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ashwin Kumar Nair, Mr.Vidit Monga and Mr. Vikas Upadhyay, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 26.05.2016 in a writ petition filed by the petitioner, appellant herein.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that an advertisement bearing no.NGT(PB)59/RR/2013 was published by the National Green Tribunal(NGT) inviting applications for recruitment to the post of PA Stenographer-Grade C/Court Master on 17.04.2013. The appellant made an application on 22.04.2013 and applied for the post of PA/Court Master(Hindi). He was informed on his registered mobile number to ...
Sudhir Sharma Thr. Parokar/Wife vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 04.2018 Pronounced on:09. 08.2018 LPA72018 & CM APPL. 529/2018 SUDHIR SHARMA THR PAROKAR/WIFE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra, Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur and Ms. Nadeem Khan, Advs. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Mr. Philomon Kani, Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Hansika Sahu and Ms. Damini K., Advs. for CBI. SI Neeraj Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of a learned single judge, rejecting his writ petition, which had sought directions to quash the decision of the jail authorities, denying him furlough (from the sentence of imprisonment that he has to undergo). LPA72018 Page 1 of 21 2. The appellant has been in judicial custody for more than 10 years in a case under Sectio...
Rao Ram Singh College of Education vs.rao Ram Singh College of Educati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
# 65 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8307/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 RAO RAM SINGH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel, NCTE with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Council, NCTE with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India 1. prays as follows:-"W.P.(C) 8307/2018 Page 1 of 3 and direct a writ of mandamus a) Alternatively issue a writ of mandamus and direct the respondent No.3 to grant approval to the faculty list submitted by petitioner under clause 7(13) of NCTE Regulations, 2014 expeditiously to enable the respondent No...
Vikrant vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1660/2018 VIKRANT versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Chaudhary with Ms. Aakanksha Bansal, Advocates. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. For the Respondent: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.150/2018 under Sections 448/380/323/509/5IPC read with Section 3(1)(g)(r)(s)(w)(z)/3(2)(va) of SC & ST (POA) Act, Police Station Moti Nagar. The petitioner has been in custody since 05.06.2018.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner had permitted the accused, who were friends of her son and helped her in running of a shop, to occupy her residential premises. Subsequently, it is alleged that when she asked them to vacate, they misbehaved with her and BAIL APPLN.1660/2018 1 one...
Prakash Kaur vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~6 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2144/2015 Decided on:9. h August, 2018 PRAKASH KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Adv. with Ms. Hemlata Kharayat, Mr. Shekhar Pathak, Ms. Barkha Rastogi & Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Advocates STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has approached this court invoking the inherent power and jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to assail the order dated 16.03.2015 of the Court of Sessions, dismissing her appeal (Criminal Appeal No.01/15) under Section 341 Cr.P.C. which had been taken out against the order dated 05.12.2014 of the Metropolitan Magistrate whereby his application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. had been dismissed, such application having been filed by her (the complainant) in the course of the proceedings arising out of criminal case (CC No.14/1/2012) initi...
Metenuo Kechu vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C.3834/2018 Judgment delivered on:.09.08.2018 METENUO KECHU versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : Ms.Rajni and Ms.Anvesh Dwivedi, Adv. For the Respondent(s): Mr.Sunil Fernades, Standing Counsel with Mr.Arnav Vidyarthi, Adv. for R-2. SI Ajit Singh, P.S.G.K-I. Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, Asst.Manager, Legal, BSES, RPL CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.105 of 2017 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Greater Kailash, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to an inspection. A direct theft bill of Rs. 3,69,243/- was raised. A final settlement was arrived at Rs. 1,50,000/-. The CRL.M.C.3834/2018 Page 1 of 2 petitioner has already deposited the entire amount and a...
Swargiya Shri Bhagwan Singh Sharma Shiksha Prasar Samiti & Anr vs.nati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
#63 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 7942/2018 SWARGIYA SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH SHARMA SHIKSHA PRASAR SAMITI & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Binisa Mohanty and Ms. Priti Kumari, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel, NCTE with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.31829/2018 (Early Hearing) The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 instituted on behalf of the applicants/petitioners pray for an advancement of the date of hearing in the accompanying petition. W.P.(C) 7942/2018 Page 1 of 6 Notice. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the non-applicants/respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in vie...
Sheela Singh vs.renu & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 09, 2018 + MAC.APP. 253/2017 RENU & ORS Through: Mr. Mrinal Harsh Vardhan, .....Appellants versus Advocate SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. Mohd. Shakim, Advocates for respondent No.1-Insurer Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 + MAC.APP. 1026/2017 SHEELA SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate versus RENU & ORS Through: Mr. Mrinal Harsh Vardhan, .....Respondents Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. Mohd. Shakim, Advocates for respondent No.3-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER C.M.10095/2017 (delay) in MAC.APP. 253/2017 There is delay of 470 days in filing the accompanying appeal. MAC.APP.253/2017 & 1026/2017 Page 1 of 7 Upon hearing, I find that sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay stands condoned. The applica...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »