Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gyan Chand & Ors. Vs.iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 09, 2018 + MAC. APP. 282/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MUKESH SAH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 283/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate Versus GYAN CHAND & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 505/2016 MUKESH SAH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Respondent + MAC. APP. 536/2016 GYAN CHAND & ORS. MAC.APP. 282/2013 MAC.APP. 283/2013 MAC.APP. 505/2016 MAC.APP. 536/2016 .....Appellants Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, .....Respondent Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORA...
Re/Max, Llc vs.gulshan Bajaj and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h August, 2018. + CS (COMM) 329/2018 & I.A. 10676/2014 RE/MAX, LLC ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and Mr. Amol Dixit, Advocates for Plaintiff. (M:9810009763) GULSHAN BAJAJ AND ORS versus Through: Ex-parte. ..... Defendants CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit for injunction has been filed by the Plaintiff in respect of the trademark RE/MAX. The expression RE/MAX is the trademark of the Plaintiff as also an essential feature of its corporate name/trading style. As per the Plaintiff, the mark RE/MAX has been coined from the phrase Real Estate MAXimums in January, 1973, by two real estate professionals Dave and Gail Liniger from Denver, Colorado. The Plaintiff renders services in the real estate sector and claims to have become the number one real estate organization in Canada. In 1997, the Plaintiff had closed more than 1 million transactions in one year which led to...
Murat Tyagi vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
#31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 2975/2017 MURAT TYAGI versus ........ Petitioner SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates for SDMC Mr. Satpal Sharma, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"W.P.(C)2975/2017 Page 1 of 4 (a) issue an appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the like nature in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents whereby directing the respondent No.1 to demolish the Construction made by the respondent No.3 at property bearing No.167, Village Chhatarpur, New Delhi in violation of section 332 of DMC...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 6 vs.mckinsey Knowledge Centre India Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 02.2018 Pronounced on:09. 08.2018 ITA5262017 MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates. ITA5902017 PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates versus MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. + ITA822018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates. versus ITA5262017 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 MCKINSEY KNOWELEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpre...
Mohd. Salauddin & Anr. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2219/2018 & Crl. M.A. 7879/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 ........ Petitioners MOHD SALAUDDIN & ANR versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Ikrant Sharma & Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advs. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Harender Kumar Ms. Divya, Adv. for R-2 to 6 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.453 of 2015 under Sections 452/3of the IPC registered at Police Station Timarpur, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The parties are neighbours residing in the same property on different floors. The subject FIR was registered consequent to an CRL.M.C. 2219/2018 Page 1 of 3 altercation which took place with regard to motor for pumping water.3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settle...
Dharmender & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4000/2018 DHARMENDER & ORS versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Karamveer Singh with Mr. Tejpal and Mr. Kamal, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. Mr. Chirag Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. ASI Raj Kumar, PS Safdarjung Enclave. JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29626/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4000/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.27/2015 under CRL.M.C. 4000/2018 Page 1 of 3 Sections 354D/34 IPC read with Section 7 of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, Police Station Safdarjung Enclave.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had gone to Hauz Khas Village to meet some friends and, on the main road, the petitioners, who were ...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.gyan Chand & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 09, 2018 + MAC. APP. 282/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MUKESH SAH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 283/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate Versus GYAN CHAND & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 505/2016 MUKESH SAH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Respondent + MAC. APP. 536/2016 GYAN CHAND & ORS. MAC.APP. 282/2013 MAC.APP. 283/2013 MAC.APP. 505/2016 MAC.APP. 536/2016 .....Appellants Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, .....Respondent Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORA...
Tejpal Singh vs.surinder Kumar Dewan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM.) 178/2018 & I.A. 10579/2018 TEJPAL SINGH Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. ........ Petitioner versus Amit Mehta & Mr. Jayant Kumar, Advs. SURINDER KUMAR DEWAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Kher, Sr. Adv. with Mr. D.R. Bhati and Ms. Subiya Akbar Warsi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 29.12.2017 passed by the sole arbitrator adjudicating the disputes between the parties in relation to the Collaboration Agreement dated 03.05.2005.2. There were three versions of the Collaboration Agreement produced before the Arbitrator.3. The first one was the original Collaboration Agreement produced by the petitioner marked as RW6D. The same contains handwritten corrections such as in Clause 4, where instea...
Raghuvinder Yadav and Anr vs.the Lt. Governor, National Capital Territ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:9. h August, 2018 $~36 * % + W.P.(C) 7962/2016 RAGHUVINDER YADAV & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Akhil Sachar and Ms.Sunanda, Advs. versus THE LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to the land of the petitioners admeasuring 1786 sq. yards out of Khasra No.5(0-8) 50/7(1-7.1/2) situated in the revenue estate of Village Pehladpur Bangar, National Capital Territory of Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Trans...
Union Public Service Commission vs.deepti Bhardwaj and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on -24.07.2018. Date of Decision-09.08.2018. + W.P.(C) 8311/2017 & C.M. No.24185/2017 (for stay) TRIBHUWAN KIRTI BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Harvinder Oberoi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr.Vikramditya Singh, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. for UPSC. + W.P.(C) 10443/2017 & C.M. Nos.22929/2018 (by respondent No.1 for directions), 42659/2017 (for stay) UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. versus DEEPTI BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rupinder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Varun Khanna & Mr.Anant Singh, Advs. for R-1. + W.P.(C) 1490/2018 & C.M. No.6126/2018 (for stay) UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. versus WP (C) No.8311/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 18 JITENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advs. for R-1....
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »