Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravinder Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10211/2016 Date of Judgment:9. h August, 2018 RAVINDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Gupta, Mr Harpreet and Mr Pranjal Sareen, Advs versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sachin Nawani, Adv for LAC CORAM: Mr Arun Birbal and Mr Sanjay Singh, Advs for DDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in khasra No.4//2 min, land admeasuring 1 bigha 01 biswa situated in the revenue estate of Village Kirari Suleman Nagar (Patti Nithari), Delhi, are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act) as neith...
Hemant @ Sunil vs.the State, Gnct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1745/2018 HEMANT @ SUNIL versus THE STATE, GNCT DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. S.N. Pandey with Mr. Rohit Kumar and Ms. Himanshi, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER0908.2018 Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.719/2017 under Sections 336/4IPC read with Sections Arms Act, Police Station Narela. Charge has been framed under Sections 307/4IPC and the petitioner was discharged of the other Sections including Sections of the Arms Act.2. 3. The petitioner has been in custody since 30.09.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly, no $~13 * + BAIL APPLN. 1745/2018 1 injury was sustained by anybody and the only allegation is that the petitioner fired at the complainant as well as in the air....
Narayan Pramanik vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3998/2018 NARAYAN PRAMANIK versus THE STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Harish Dasan with Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocates. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. Ankur Raghav, Advocate for R-2. SI Sunil Kumar, PS Govindpuri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29620/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3998/2018 & Crl.M.A.29621/2018 (stay) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.782/2015 under CRL.M.C. 3998/2018 Page 1 of 3 Sections 498A/406 IPC, Police Station Govind Puri.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner is the husband of respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mukesh Sah & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 09, 2018 + MAC. APP. 282/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MUKESH SAH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 283/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate Versus GYAN CHAND & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 505/2016 MUKESH SAH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Respondent + MAC. APP. 536/2016 GYAN CHAND & ORS. MAC.APP. 282/2013 MAC.APP. 283/2013 MAC.APP. 505/2016 MAC.APP. 536/2016 .....Appellants Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, .....Respondent Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORA...
Union of India and Anr. Vs.karan Thapar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5365/2018 & C.M.No.20807/2018 (stay) UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Dr.Ashwani Bharadwaj, Adv. versus KARAN THAPAR AND ORS. Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER0908.2018 1. The petitioner/Union of India is aggrieved by the order dated 30.11.2016, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi allowing O.A. No.1415/2015 filed by five applicants, praying inter alia, to hold the decision of the DPC constituted by the respondents assessing them as unfit and not recommending their names for promotion to the grade of Deputy Commissioner, as illegal and arbitrary and as a consequence thereof, to promote them to the post of Deputy Commissioner Grade- V w.e.f. 18.07.2014, the date on which other officers of their batch were promoted, if otherwise found fit.2. The factual matrix necessary for deciding the present case is ...
Sukhdev Singh & Ors. Vs.registrar of Companies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~C-27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:09. 08.2018 + CO.PET. 748/2015 SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Risabh Jain, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Manchanda Standing Counsel with Ms. Divya Singh, Advocate for OL. Mr. P.S. Singh, Advocate for ROC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This company petition has filed under section 518(1)(b) of the 1. Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 for complete stay on the voluntary winding up of the respondent company.2. The Board of Directors in their meeting date 22.02.2012 decided to institute Members Voluntary Winding-Up proceedings and gave the Declaration of Solvency pursuant to section 488(2) of the Act. In the Extra Ordinary General Meeting a special resolution was passed for commencement of the winding up of the company under section 484(1)(b) of the...
Raj Singh & Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.306/2003 RAJ SINGH & ANR. STATE Reserved on:26. h July, 2018 Decided on:09. August, 2018 .....Appellants Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra and Mr Brijesh versus Singh, Advocates. ....Respondent Through: Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal directed against the judgment dated 17th April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.5registered at Police Station (PS) Narela, Delhi convicting the three Appellants i.e. Raj Singh (Accused No.1: A-1), Raghubir Singh (A-2) and Om Prakash (A-5) of the offences under Sections 3and 3of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 21st April, 2003 whereby each of them was sentenced to imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.5,000/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for three ...
Tejpal Gautam and Ors vs.central Public Works Department and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h August, 2018. W.P.(C) 8448/2017 & CM No.34811/2017 (for stay) TEJPAL GAUTAM AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish Tiwari and Mr. Surya Joshi, Advs. Versus CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mansi Gupta, Adv. for Ms. Manisha Agarwal, Adv. for R-1 with Mr. Gurcharan, representative of CPWD. Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER0908.2018 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by as % 1. many as thirteen petitioners, claiming to be residing along with their families in different jhuggis at R.K. Puram, Delhi, impugns the notices, all stated to be dated 4th September, 2017, issued to each of them, under Section 5A(2) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act) as well as the orders, all stated to be dated 14th September, 2017, under Section 5A(2) of the said Act, of re...
Liladhar Ramchandani & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 2320/2018 LILADHAR RAMCHANDANI & ORS ........ Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Nishtha Chawla, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR3982016 under Sections of the Haryana Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1974, Police Station IP Estate.2. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a strike which was undertaken by the petitioners, who were nurses and office bearers of the Nurses Association at the Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Post CRL.M.C. 2320/2018 Page 1 of 3 Graduate Medical Education & Research.3. Subsequently, the management of the hospital in its meeting of 03.09.2016 had decided that in case the strike was withdrawn there woul...
Malkhan Meena & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4013/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 MALKHAN MEENA & ORS. ........ Petitioners STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Narendra Gautam and Mr. Amarnath, Advs. Mr. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Devender Singh Mr. Jameel Ahmed, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.C. 29659/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4013/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.231 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Defence Colony, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 4013/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that parties have settled their disputes and have ...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »