Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Kumar vs.mohd. Kamil & Others (National Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 10, 2018 + MAC. APP. 369/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Appellant + MAC. APP. 612/2017 ANIL KUMAR & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate 1. ANIL KUMAR Through: Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MOHD. KAMIL & OTHERS (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 9th February, 2017 grants compensation of `8,47,100/- with interest @12% per annum to three wheeler driver-Anil Kumar, aged 47 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 28th October, 2014.2. In the above captioned first appeal, Insurer seeks exoneration from paying awarded compensation on the ground that the insured bus was not MAC.App.369/2017 & 612/2017 Page 1 of 7 having a valid permit. In the above captioned s...
Dinesh Kumar Saini vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
#59 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8339/2018 DINESH KUMAR SAINI versus ........ Petitioner EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, Advocates : Mohd. Faisal, Advocate with Insp. Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Licensing Unit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the respondent i.e. premises bearing H.No.C-40, G/F, Khasra No.8/2...
Skymap Technologies Private Limited vs.xad Inc. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h August, 2018 + CS (COMM) 1048/2018, I.As. 10006/2018 & 10008/2018 SKYMAP TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Ms. Abhay J.V., Ms. Apoorva Murali and Ms. Kreettika Advocates. (M:9871792740) Vijay, XAD INC. AND ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ananya Kumar, Mr. Manish Jha and Ms. Megha Kapoor, Advs. for D-1 to 5. (M:9910627489) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit for infringement of copyrights, damages, rendition of accounts etc. has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking an injunction and damages against the Defendants.2. The Plaintiff entered into a service agreement dated 16th September, 2015 with Defendant No.6, which is a subsidiary of Defendant No.1. According to the Plaintiff, as per the terms of the said agreement, it was to be given access to the Defendants platform called Blueprints,...
Arvind Kaur Bedi vs.paramjit Singh Bedi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~OS-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(OS) 375/2017 Date of decision:10. 08.2018 ..... Plaintiff ARVIND KAUR BEDI Through Mr.Sushant,Mahajan, Adv. PARAMJIT SINGH BEDI & ORS versus ..... Defendants Through Mr.Rajvinder Singh, Adv. for D-1 and D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.9282/2017 1. This application is filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC seeking interim injunction to restrain the defendants or its nominee from transferring, selling, alienating or parting with possession of the immoveable properties bearing Nos.Flat EB200 SFS Flats, Maya Enclave, G-8 Area, Rajouri Garden (now called Hari Nagar), New Delhi and Flat No.7556 (First Floor), Sector-B, Pocket-10, SFS DDA Flats, Vasant Kunj, Delhi.2. This suit is filed for partition, injunction and declaration regarding the said two properties situated at Hari Nagar and Vasant Kunj. It has been pleaded in the plaint that the plaintiff is the widow of Late Sh.M.S.Bedi (S/o of Late Sh...
M/S. McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.pr. Commissioner of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 02.2018 Pronounced on:09. 08.2018 ITA4612017 M/S. MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates ITA5262017 MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates. ITA5902017 PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates ITA4612017 & connected matters Page 1 of 38 + versus MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Cha...
Sajid Iqbal & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 1839/2018 SAJID IQBAL & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh, PS Samaipur Badli. Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR492012 under Sections 454/380/4IPC, Police Station Samaipur Badli.2. As per the allegations in the FIR, two of the co-accused, who were the employees of the complainant, in connivance with others, made a duplicate key and stole bundles of papers from the godown of the complainant. CRL.M.C. 1839/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes and a Settlement Agreement dated 20.11.2017 has been executed between...
Someshwar Bharti & Ors. Vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4011/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 SOMESHWAR BHARTI & ORS THE STATE & ORS versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Ms. Shama Parveen, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ranvir Singh Mr. Sohan Lal, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0908.2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.212 of 2012 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Burari, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and have amicably dissolved their marriage by mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 23.04.2018 has been passed. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into a settlement dat...
Mukesh Sah & Ors. Vs.iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 09, 2018 + MAC. APP. 282/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MUKESH SAH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 283/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate Versus GYAN CHAND & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate + MAC. APP. 505/2016 MUKESH SAH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate .....Respondent + MAC. APP. 536/2016 GYAN CHAND & ORS. MAC.APP. 282/2013 MAC.APP. 283/2013 MAC.APP. 505/2016 MAC.APP. 536/2016 .....Appellants Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advocate Versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, .....Respondent Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORA...
Kehar Singh Saini vs.amar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h August, 2018. RSA3572016 & CM No.43935/2016 (for stay) KEHAR SINGH SAINI Through: Mr. Virendra Singh, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus AMAR SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. ..... Respondent This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil 1. Procedure, 1908 impugns the judgment and decree [dated 8th March, 2016 in RCA No.of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge (North- West)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 31st October, 2013 in Civil Suit No.1(Unique ID No.02401C5142412004) of the Court of Civil Judge-01 (West)]. of dismissal of the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from dispossessing the appellant/plaintiff from shop bearing plot no.72, forming part of Harlal Market, Nahar Park, Delhi 110 085.2. T...
McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.pr. Commissioner of Incom ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. 02.2018 Pronounced on:09. 08.2018 ITA5262017 MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-6 ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates. ITA5902017 PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates versus MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. + ITA822018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocates. versus ITA5262017 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 MCKINSEY KNOWELEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla & Mr. Harpre...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »