Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gagandeep Singh @ Gaggi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1004/2018 GAGANDEEP SINGH @ GAGGI ........ Petitioner STATE versus ..... Respondent Mr.Kuldip Babbar, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. S.I. Virender Kumar, PS KNK Marg JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.347/2017, under Section 3IPC read with Section 27 Arms Act, Police Station KNK Marg. Subsequently, Section 302 IPC has been added.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had exalted the co-accused, who then shot the victim and the victim subsequently expired.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner BAIL APPLN. 1004/2018 Page 1 of 3 has been falsely implicated and there is recording of the brother of the victim wherein he had come to the house of the mothe...
Sonu Kumar & Bhawna Kumari & Ors. Vs.state of Gnct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4025/2018 SONU KUMAR & BHAWNA KUMARI & ORS versus STATE OF GNCT DELHI ....... Petitioners ..... Respondent Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Sanjay Kumar, PS Harsh Vihar. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for R-2. JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.94/2018 under Sections 406/498A/5IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Harsh Vihar.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 CRL.M.C. 4025/2018 Page 1 of 3 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.4 is the brother-in-law of the respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits tha...
Pran Nath Kapur (Decd) Thr. Lrs vs.dhian Nath Kapur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h August, 2018 + FAO(OS) 127/2018 & CM APPLs.32017-18/2018 PRAN NATH KAPUR (DECD) THR. LRS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus DHIAN NATH KAPUR Through: None ... Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellant and the respondent, in this appeal before us, were the plaintiff and defendant, respectively, in CS (OS) 2746/2014.2. The appellant and respondent are brothers, and children of Dina Nath Kapur, who died on 20th March, 1978. Consequent on his demise, the respondent filed CS (OS) 2746/2014, against the appellant, for partition and injunction in respect of a property bearing No.14, Park Area, opposite Ajmal Khan Park, New Delh-110005, admeasuring 1302 sq. yards. The said property originally belonged to Dina Nath Kapur, who died on 20th March, 1978, leaving behind a will dated, 29th May, 1965, whereunder all the assets...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd vs.munesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 10, 2018 + MAC.APP. 719/2016 & CM323072016 + MAC.APP. 720/2016 & CM323222016 + MAC.APP. 721/2016 & CM323242016 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates ..... Appellant Versus NAFE SINGH & ORS MUNESH & ORS KRISHAN KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jatinder Kamra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals relate to one vehicular accident, 1. which took place on 20th August, 2007 in which a self employed-Amit S/o Nafe Singh, aged 18 years; a labourer-Joginder@ Kala S/o Surat Singh, aged 30 years and labourer-Raman S/o Krishan Kumar, aged 19 years, had died. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above- captioned three appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. As per last order, service is complete. During the pendency of these appeals, Nafe Singh, one ...
Subhash vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h July 2018 Decided on:10. h August 2018 + SUNIL @ SONU STATE + CRL.A. 513/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Purnima, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1130/2016 NEERAJ MANN Through: Mr Rahul Sharma and Mr.AnreshKaushik, Advocates. ..... Appellant STATE + INDERJEET STATE + SUBHASH versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 158/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 583/2017 ..... Appellant Crl.A. 513/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Through: Ms. Purnima, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These four appeals are directed against the judgment dated 24th August 2016 passed by the learned Additional Session...
Nancy Rustagi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
#81 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018. W.P.(C) 8235/2018 & CM APPL. 31519-31520/2018 NANCY RUSTAGI ....... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Rekha Rustagi and Ms. Mitanshi Rustagi, Advs. : Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Bibhash Kumar, Adv. for UOI/ R-1 to 3, Dr. Gurleen Kaur (Consultant), Medical Counseling Committee, Directorate General of Health Services Ms. Pragya Juneja, Assistant Registrar (Adv.) for LHMC, & Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. For University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is essentially limited to seeking a direction to the respondents to grant the petitioner admission in MBBS Course, conducted by Lady Hardinge Medical College, respondent No.3 herein (for short LHMC)...
Ankur Mutreja vs.aechbs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 3962/2011 ANKUR MUTREJA AECHBS versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS:... Petitioner in person. Mr. S.N. Singhal, Secretary of the Society CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 09.06.2011 whereby the application of the petitioner seeking striking out of the alleged irrelevant allegations in the reply filed by the respondent has been rejected.2. The petitioner had as made a complaint under Section 473 of the DMC Act, inter alia, contending that the respondent society which was managing a Community Hall was using the back portion of the CRL.M.C. 3962/2018 Page 1 of 5 Community Hall for the purposes of catering/cooking, etc. which is causing nuisance.3. In the reply filed by the respondent, the allegations made by the petit...
Pushkar Singh Bisht vs.bhim Singh Bisht
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h August, 2018 RSA2652017 & CM No.42187/2017 (for stay) PUSHKAR SINGH BISHT Through: Mr. Triloki Pandit, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. Rajendra Dutt, Advocate. ..... Respondent BHIM SINGH BISHT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 31st January, 2017 in RCA-DJ-5333/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-IV, New Delhi District]. of dismissal of the first appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 26th September, 2015 in Suit No.282/2014 (Unique ID No.02401C0097952002) of the Court of Civil Judge-05, Central District]. of dismissal of suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of possession of immovable property and for recovery of mesne profits.2. The appeal came first before this Court on 21st November,...
Sat Pal Alias Raju vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~R-14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 219/2003 SAT PAL alias RAJU Through: None ... Appellant versus THE STATE Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. .... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL * + % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1008.2018 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 7th February, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.563/1996 registered at Police Station (PS) Bhajanpura, Delhi convicting the Appellant for the offence under Sections 392/34, 3and 411 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 11th February, 2003 whereby for the offence under Section 3IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life along with a fine of Rs.1,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for six months; for the offence under Section 3IPC to undergo RI for seven years along with a fine of Rs.500/-, and in d...
Era Business School vs. All India Council for Technical Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
#50 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 7168/2018 ERA BUSINESS SCHOOL ........ Petitioner versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Raju Rama Chandran, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amitesh Kumar and Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Advocates : Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhinav Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India essentially seeks a writ of certiorari to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 30.04.2018 passed by All India Council For Technical Education (for short AICTE), whereby the AICTE rejected the approval sought on W.P.(C) 7168/2018 Page 1 of 3 behalf of the petitioner institute seeking restoration of intake of students in respect of the petitioner institute for the academic year 2018-19.2. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »