Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Phoolwati Tokas vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~4 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1332/2017 & CRL. M (Bail) 1258/2017 Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 + + PHOOLWATI TOKAS ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1345/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1263/2017 ..... Respondent VIJAY TOKAS ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1374/2017, CRL.M.(BAIL) 1307/2017 & ..... Respondent CRL.M.As. 12852-12853/2017 YASH TOKAS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr.Uday Prakash, Ms. Richa Diwan and Mr.Sujit Jha, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State (in item No.4) Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State (in item Nos. 5 and6) SI Ranbir Singh. BAIL APPLNS. 1332/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.250/2017...
Fakhruddin vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
#57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8337/2018 FAKHRUDDIN versus Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kr. Verma, Advocates : Mr. Pankaj Garg, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Milind Garg and Ms. Arpita Kumari, Advocates. Insp. Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Licensing Unit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the resp...
Nitin Sofat & Anr. Vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4036/2018 NITIN SOFAT & ANR ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Sandeep with Mr. Rajesh Khari, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. Pradeep Kataria, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. SI Satvinder, PS Kalkaji. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29742/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4036/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.923/2014 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Kalkaji. CRL.M.C. 4036/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submi...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.sweka Power Tech Engineers Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 160/2018 Date of decision:10. h August, 2018. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Aakanksha Nehra, Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Mr. Govind Chaudhary and Mr. Namon Tandon, Advocates. versus SWEKA POWER TECH ENGINEERS PVT LTD AND ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Ms. Charul Sarin and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Ms. Swagata and Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advocates for R-2 North DMC. Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel for R-3/EDMC. Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel with Mr. Mayank Goel for R-North MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This intra-court appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and FAO(OS)(C...
Bhawana Sharma vs.shyam Sunder Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CM(M) 911/2018 BHAWANA SHARMA Through: $~10 * + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA Through: None. Versus... Petitioner-in-person. ORDER1008.2018 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns % 1. the order [dated 3rd July, 2018 in HMA No.133/2016 of the Court of Judge, Family Court (West)]. of dismissal of the application dated 2nd December, 2016 of the petitioner/wife for recall of the order dated 27th October, 2016 and for re-opening of the evidence of the petitioner/wife.2. A lady, who claims to be the petitioner/wife, who has filed this petition, in person has been heard.3. From a perusal of the paper book, it transpires that the respondent/husband, as far back as on 23rd April, 2001, instituted the proceedings, from which this petition arises, for dissolution of his marriage with the petitioner/wife under Section 13(1)(i-a) and 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu ...
Msd Oss b.v vs.reliance Life Sciences Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~OS-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. 08.2018 + CS(COMM) 1053/2016 MSD OSS B.V Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pravin anand, Ms.Udita Patro and Mr. Shamim Nooroyozdan, Advs. ..... Plaintiff versus RELIANCE LIFE SCIENCES PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bitika Sharma, Ms.Anusuya Nigam, Ms.Ruchika Wadhawan, Mr.Aditya Mishra and Ms.Sahiba Pantel, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.2037/2018 1. This application is filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to bring on record the change in the title of the suit patent.2. It has been pleaded that the plaintiff-MSD OSS BV merged into Organon BioScience Nederland BV and pursuant to that merger the patentee of the suit patent became Organon BioScience Nederland BV. Subsequently, Organon BioScience Nederland BV merged into Merck Sharp & Dohme BV who has now become the patentee of the suit patent and hence, the present application to sub...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd vs.krishan Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 10, 2018 + MAC.APP. 719/2016 & CM323072016 + MAC.APP. 720/2016 & CM323222016 + MAC.APP. 721/2016 & CM323242016 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates ..... Appellant Versus NAFE SINGH & ORS MUNESH & ORS KRISHAN KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jatinder Kamra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals relate to one vehicular accident, 1. which took place on 20th August, 2007 in which a self employed-Amit S/o Nafe Singh, aged 18 years; a labourer-Joginder@ Kala S/o Surat Singh, aged 30 years and labourer-Raman S/o Krishan Kumar, aged 19 years, had died. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above- captioned three appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. As per last order, service is complete. During the pendency of these appeals, Nafe Singh, one ...
Avneet Soni vs.kavita Agarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$-52 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h August, 2018 EX.P. 386/2015 & EA(OS) 861/2015, 233, 337, 339/2017, 197, 268/2018 AVNEET SONI Through: Mr.Jayant K.Mehta, Mr.Suresh Baxy, Mr.Anurag Thakur, Advs. ..... Decree Holder versus KAVITA AGARWAL ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhijat, Mr.Abhishek Aggarwal, Mr.G.Gupta, Advs. Mr.Simranjit H.Virk, Adv. for Garnishee Nos.3 and 6. Mr. Mr.Rishabh Bansal, Adv. for the applicant in EA(OS) No.337/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) EA(OS) 268/2018 This is an application seeking condonation of 46 days delay in filing reply to EA(OS) 197/2018. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the application stands allowed. EA(OS) 197/2018 1. This application has been filed by the petitioner inter alia Ex.P. No.386/2015 Page 1 praying for an order of attachment of the rights of the Judgment Debtor in the two Agreement(s) to Sell bot...
Kulwinder Singh vs.state of Nct & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~15 & 16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + CRL.M.C. 1987/2016 KULWINDER SINGH Decided on:-"10th August, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhik Kumar with Mr. Rinku Mathur, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State with SI Madhurendra Kumar, P.S. EOW. Mr. Rakesh Wadhwa, Advocate for R-2. CRL.M.C. 4155/2016 RESHAM SINGH LALLY Through: Mr. Rakesh Wadhwa, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State with SI Madhurendra Kumar, P.S. EOW. Mr. Abhik Kumar with Mr. Rinku Mathur, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the complaint of Resham Singh Lally (the petitioner in Crl.M.C. No.4155/2016), the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of South District, by his order dated 09.05.2013, exercising his power and jurisdiction under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Crl. M.C. No.1987/2016 & 4155/2016 Page 1 of 7 (Cr.P.C....
Avery India Ltd. Vs.nirmal Kumar Jain and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h August, 2018 RSA1482017, CM No.20020/2017 (for stay), CM No.20021/2017 and CM No.20022/2017 for exemption) and CM No.20023/2017 (for extension of time to file deficient court fee). (both AVERY INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B. Mohan, Adv with Mr. P.R. Bahl, Mr. Raghav Gupta and Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advs. Versus NIRMAL KUMAR JAIN AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.K. Srivastava, Mr. B. B. Jain and Mr. Abhay Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 16th February, 2017 in RCA21(New No.60786/16) of the Court of Additional District Judge-03 (West)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 28th February, 2013 in Suit No.537/2002 of the Court of Additional Civil Judge (West)]. allowing th...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »