Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd ..... Vs.prabhabati Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August, 10, 2018 + MAC.APP. 738/2017 & C.M. No.29703/2017 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellant versus PRABHABATI DEVI & ORS. + MAC.APP. 449/2018 Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate .....Appellants PRABHABATI DEVI & ORS. ICICI LOMBARD GEN INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate .....Respondents 1. The above-captioned two cross appeals are directed against impugned Award of 19th April, 2017 vide which compensation of 31,03,624/- with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to Claimants on account of death of a bank peon/attendant-Chander Kumar, MAC.APP. 738/2017& 449.2018 Page 1 of 6 aged 55 years. The above-captioned first appeal is by the Insurer to seek exoneration from paying compensation granted, whereas in the above- captioned second ap...
Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal vs.east Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
#56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8336/2018 SANJAY KUMAR AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner versus EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Sharma and Mr. Amit Kr. Verma, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shashi Gupta, Advocate. Insp. Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Licensing Unit. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"In the facts and circumstances of the present case this Honble Court may pleased to: a) Pass a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order(s)/direction(s) against the respondent, thereby directing or ordering the respondent to allow a period of 15 days to the petitioner to remove his machines, raw/furnished material out of the premises so sealed by the no.D-Block, responden...
Ramesh Chand Jain vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h August, 2018. RSA1142018 RAMESH CHAND JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Ms. Meenakshi Rawat and Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CMs No.32159/2018 & 32160/2018 (both for exemption) Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. RSA1142018 & CMs No.32158/2018 (for stay), 32161/2018 & 32162/2018 (both for condonation of delays of 47 days in filing and 40 days in re-filing the appeal) 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 5th January, 2018 in RCA No.1164/2016 of the Court of Senior Civil Judge (Central)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 20th September, 2011 in Suit No.192/2011 (Case ID No....
Ram Pal Sharma vs.gopi Nath Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h August, 2018 RSA1102018 & CM No.30871/2018 (for stay) RAM PAL SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jagdish Kumar Solanki, Adv. versus Through: None. GOPI NATH PVT LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ..... Respondent Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 28th March, 2018 in Civil Appeal No.(new no.61517/16) (Unique ID No.DLCT01- 002183-2014) of the Court of Additional District Judge-8 (Central)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 31st October, 2014 in Suit No.(Unique ID No.02401C0192472002) of the Court of Civil Judge- 03, Central]. allowing the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff and passing a decree in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and against the appellant/defendant of mandatory injunction directing the appellant/defend...
In the Matter of Ascertiva India Private Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs.... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~CP-29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:10. 08.2018 CO.PET. No.16/2018 IN THE MATTER OF ASCERTIVA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) ..Petitioner Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a company petition, preferred under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL) for Voluntary Winding up of ASCERTIVA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ((herein referred to as the said company) from the date of filing of the instant petition.2. The record shows that the said Company in issue was incorporated on 18.01.2011. The Corporate Identity Number of the Company is U74140DL2011FTC212769. The registered office of the said Company in issue is stated to be situated at N-59, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi 110048. The main object to be pursued by the said Company, as stated in the Memorandum of Association, is to carry on the business of consultancy, de...
Girdhar Tulani & Anr vs. Kanta Hiranandani & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.642/2018 % GIRDHAR TULANI & ANR. 10th August, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ashok Kriplani, Advocate. versus KANTA HIRANANDANI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.31984/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.31983/2018 (delay in filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing is condoned, subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.642/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 31981/2018 (for stay), 31982/2018 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC) RFA No.642/2018 Page 1 of 12 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 8.3.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for partition filed by the respondents/plai...
Dhirender Pratap Singh vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4024/2018 DHIRENDER PRATAP SINGH ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR .....Respondents Mr. Mukesh Birla, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Vishal Tiwari, PS Ambedkar Nagar. JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29722/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4024/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.124/2012 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar. CRL.M.C. 4024/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner is the husband of respondent No.2.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held before Mediation Centre, Saket ...
Neeraj vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~R-24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 364/2003 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. K. S. Ahuja, APP for State Through: None versus NEERAJ CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT1008.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 4th April, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.81/2000 arising out of FIR No.416/2000 registered at Police Station (PS) Nangloi convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 3IPC and Section of the Arms Act and the order on sentence dated 7th April, 2003 whereby for the offence punishable under Section 3IPC he was sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for life along with a fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to undergo further RI for ten months; for the offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act to undergo RI for one year along with a fine of Rs.1000/-, and in default of payment of fine...
Sunil @ Sonu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h July 2018 Decided on:10. h August 2018 + SUNIL @ SONU STATE + CRL.A. 513/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Purnima, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1130/2016 NEERAJ MANN Through: Mr Rahul Sharma and Mr.AnreshKaushik, Advocates. ..... Appellant STATE + INDERJEET STATE + SUBHASH versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 158/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 583/2017 ..... Appellant Crl.A. 513/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Through: Ms. Purnima, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These four appeals are directed against the judgment dated 24th August 2016 passed by the learned Additional Session...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd vs.nafe Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 10, 2018 + MAC.APP. 719/2016 & CM323072016 + MAC.APP. 720/2016 & CM323222016 + MAC.APP. 721/2016 & CM323242016 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates ..... Appellant Versus NAFE SINGH & ORS MUNESH & ORS KRISHAN KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jatinder Kamra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals relate to one vehicular accident, 1. which took place on 20th August, 2007 in which a self employed-Amit S/o Nafe Singh, aged 18 years; a labourer-Joginder@ Kala S/o Surat Singh, aged 30 years and labourer-Raman S/o Krishan Kumar, aged 19 years, had died. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above- captioned three appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. As per last order, service is complete. During the pendency of these appeals, Nafe Singh, one ...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »