Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Inderjeet vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h July 2018 Decided on:10. h August 2018 + SUNIL @ SONU STATE + CRL.A. 513/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Purnima, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1130/2016 NEERAJ MANN Through: Mr Rahul Sharma and Mr.AnreshKaushik, Advocates. ..... Appellant STATE + INDERJEET STATE + SUBHASH versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 158/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 583/2017 ..... Appellant Crl.A. 513/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Through: Ms. Purnima, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These four appeals are directed against the judgment dated 24th August 2016 passed by the learned Additional Session...
Directrorate of Enforcement vs.surajpal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 CRL.REV.P. 67/2017 DIRECTRORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ........ Petitioner versus SURAJPAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Krishanu Bawa, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : . For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Aditya Vikram with Mr. Avinash, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Akhilesh Kumar and Mr. Raghav Nagar for R-4. JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.1025/2017 (for condonation of delay) 1. It is submitted that several administrative authorities had to be consulted for taking a decision of filing the present petition, on account of which, delay took place in filing the present petition. CRL.REV.P. 67/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. In view of the averments made in the application as also the arguments advanced, I am of the view that the petitioner has explained the delay in ...
Dr Meena Harsinghani & Anr vs.medical Council of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 807/2016 & CM No.3689/2016 % + DR MEENA HARSINGHANI & ANR ...Petitioners Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr Abhishek Paruthi. :Mr Tarun Verma, Ms Amandeep Kaur, Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Puja Sarkar and Ms Michelle for MCI/R-1. Mr Jawahar Narang and Mr Parshant, for R Mr Pankaj Seth for R-3. Mr Praveen Khattar with Mr Bapi Das, Advocates for R-4 with L.D.S. Uppal, Assistant Secretary, DMC. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 14.01.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Medical Council of India (hereafter MCI), whereby the MCI has enhanced the punishment imposed on petitioner no.2 and upheld the punishment imposed on petitioner no.1 by the Delhi Medica...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.anil Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 10, 2018 + MAC. APP. 369/2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Appellant + MAC. APP. 612/2017 ANIL KUMAR & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate 1. ANIL KUMAR Through: Mr. S.N. Prashar, Advocate .....Appellant Versus MOHD. KAMIL & OTHERS (NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 9th February, 2017 grants compensation of `8,47,100/- with interest @12% per annum to three wheeler driver-Anil Kumar, aged 47 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 28th October, 2014.2. In the above captioned first appeal, Insurer seeks exoneration from paying awarded compensation on the ground that the insured bus was not MAC.App.369/2017 & 612/2017 Page 1 of 7 having a valid permit. In the above captioned s...
Gautam Dass and Ors. Vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
#53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8326/2018 GAUTAM DASS AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioners SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Bharadwaj and Mr. Majid Malik, Advocates For the Respondent : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi and Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays as follows:-"(a) issue a writ, order or direction or an appropriate writ to direct the respondent to temporarily de-seal the property in khasra bearing No.96, Ground Floor, Satbari Village, New Delhi the article, equipment, fitting & fixture from the said property. to enable the petitioners to take out W.P.(C)8326/2018 Page 1 of 2 2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.4. Learned counsel appearing o...
Mithlesh & Anr. Vs.abbo Kumar & Ors. (United India Insurance Co. Ltd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ 33 * % + MAC.APP.25/2018 MITHLESH & ANR. Date of Decision:10. h August, 2018 . Appellants Through: Mr.Yogendra Kumar Verma, Mr. Vijandra Kumar, Mr.Manoj Goel, Advocates along with appellants in person. Versus ABBO KUMAR & ORS. (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.) . Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate... RESPONDENTS for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.30,45,404/- has been awarded to the appellants.2. The accident dated 16th March, 2016 resulted in the death of Ajay Kumar. The deceased was aged 24 years and was self employed as building material supplier. It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.30,000/- per month. The deceased was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition for compensation before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of Rs.2,77,181/- per annum as income of the dece...
Railway Board vs.prashant Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:10. h August, 2018 LPA2952018 RAILWAY BOARD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Om Prakash, Advocate versus PRASHANT KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajan Mani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL216592018 (delay) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 173 days delay in filing the present appeal.2. Heard.3. The prayer made in the application is not opposed. Delay of 173 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.4. The application stands disposed of. LPA2952018 & C.M.21656/2018 (stay) 5. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 11.10.2017 wherein challenge was laid to an order dated 31.12.2014 passed by the Chief Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities (in short Commissioner) whereby the Commissioner had L.P.A.295/2018 Page 1 of 5 considered and allowed ...
M/S B. R. Fabrications vs.shakti Food Products
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.290/2017 + % M/S B. R. FABRICATIONS10h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Advocate. SHAKTI FOOD PRODUCTS versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M.Nos.10235/2017(for condonation of delay 10236/2017(for condonation of delay in re-filing) in filing) & 1. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay of 6 days in filing and 67 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.290/2017 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 16.8.2016 by which RFA No.290/2017 Page 1 of 5 trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.5,77,000/- along with interest filed by the appellant/plaintiff.3. The appellant/plaintiff pleaded that it was in the business of manuf...
Yash Tokas vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~4 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1332/2017 & CRL. M (Bail) 1258/2017 Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 + + PHOOLWATI TOKAS ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1345/2017 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1263/2017 ..... Respondent VIJAY TOKAS ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1374/2017, CRL.M.(BAIL) 1307/2017 & ..... Respondent CRL.M.As. 12852-12853/2017 YASH TOKAS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr.Uday Prakash, Ms. Richa Diwan and Mr.Sujit Jha, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State (in item No.4) Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State (in item Nos. 5 and6) SI Ranbir Singh. BAIL APPLNS. 1332/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 3 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.250/2017...
Saleem Babu & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2018
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4047/2018 SALEEM BABU & ORS versus THE STATE & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Ms. Ifat Sultana with Mr. Nadeem Hussain, Advocates. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. SI Shri Gopal, PS Shakar Pur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29776/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4047/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.646/2013 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, Police Station Shakarpur. CRL.M.C. 4047/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.4 and 5 are the brother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »