Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4078/2018 Judgment delivered on:13. 08.2018 RAJESH KUMAR THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : [ For the Respondent: Mr. Sandeep Verma, Adv. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ASI Padeum Kumar, P.S.Malviya Nagar. Mr.Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Ms.Priyansha Sharma and Mr.Arnav Vidyarthi, Advs. for respondent No.2. Mr.Pradeep Maisoya, Asst.Manager, Legal, BSES RPL. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1308.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 29892/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4078/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.374 of 2016 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioner where ...
A & a Dukaan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs.mr. Abhishek Kohli & Othe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
17 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 7/2018 A & A DUKAAN FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through:Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Iyer and Mr. Anandh K., Advocates. Versus ..... Defendants Through: None MR. ABHISHEK KOHLI & OTHERS % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:13. hAugust, 2018 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A.10783/2018 1. Today in Court, learned counsel for the plaintiff has handed over a photocopy of an application filed under Order XIIIA Rules 2, 4 and 6 of CPC seeking summary judgment on 09th August, 2018. The original application has been numbered by the Registry at the instance of the Court and placed on record. Since the defendant is ex parte, the said application is taken up for hearing and disposal. CS(COMM) 7/2018 Page 1 of 8 CS(COMM) 7/2018 & I.As.101/2018, 2789/2018 2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off, dilution,...
State (Nct) of Delhi vs.ahish Taneja & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~35-37 & 39-40 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3780/2016 & Crl.M.A.15813/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus MOMIN @ SABBIR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-3. CRL.M.C. 3781/2016 & Crl.M.A.15817/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus SAMIR @ CHUKKAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3805/2016 & Crl.M.A.15922/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Vivek, PS Nabi Karim ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 5 + + + versus RAHUL @ RITIK & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.3780/2016 & connected matters + + Through: Mr. Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3879/2016 & Crl.M.A.16306/2016 ...
C S Agarwal vs.m/s Rajdhani Nursuries & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h August, 2018 + FAO(OS) 87/2018 C S AGARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, Mr.Rahul Sinha and Mr.Gauransh Gupta, Advs. versus M/S RAJDHANI NURSURIES & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This appeal, at the instance of Defendant No.1 in CS(OS) 76/2010, is directed against order, dated 7th May, 2018, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed IA62162018, filed by the appellant/defendant No.1 under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC).2. Given the limited scope of controversy before us, it is not necessary to allude, in detail, to the dispute forming subject matter of the main suit, i.e. CS(OS) 76/2010. Suffice it to state that, in IA8822010, filed by Defendant Nos. 1 and 3 in CS(OS) 76/2010, the FAO(OS) 87/2018 Page 1 of 6 following order was ...
Virender Singh vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~R-17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 611/2017 VIRENDER SINGH .... Appellant Through Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1308.2018 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21st January, 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.28689/2016 arising out of FIR No.34/2012 registered at Police Station (PS) Gulabi Bagh convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC.2. The appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 28th January, 2017 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.25,000/- in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment (SI) for three months.3. The charge framed against the Appellant was that he murdered his wife Darshani (hereafter the deceased) at around 1.30 pm on 17...
Shakuntala Devi Educational Society vs.mohammed Shahid Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~ O-21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h August, 2018 CS(OS) 243/2018 SHAKUNTALA DEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Achal Gupta, Mr.Kushagra Sah, versus Advocates. MOHAMMED SHAHID CHAUDHARY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA Through ..... Defendant JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.4,50,00,000/- along with interest thereon against the defendant under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. The plaintiff advanced a sum of Rs.2,00,00,000/- to the defendant for being invested in real estate vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 15th December, 2011. Vide Addendum dated 24th September, 2012, the defendant agreed to refund the principal amount of Rs.2,00,00,000/- by 14th October, 2012 and the investment benefits of Rs.1,50,00,000/- by 12th December, 2012 to the plaintiff. The defendant also gave two cheques for Rs.2,00,00,000/- and Rs.50,00,000/- to the plaintiff which were...
State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.mohd.zahid & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h August, 2018 CRL.L.P. 31/2017 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP versus for State. MOHD.ZAHID & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. H.Rehman, Advocate with respondents in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.1022/2017 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 16 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 31/2017 1. By this petition State seeks leave to appeal against the acquittal of respondents in case FIR No.84/2012 under Section 3IPC registered at PS Chandani Mahal, Delhi on the complaint of Tahir.2. The above noted FIR was registered on the complaint of Tahir who stated that he was residing at House No.1133, behind Delight Cinema, Chandani Mahal and had four brothers. He along with Mojahid and Asif, his two brothers and their father Shahid Ali...
Gaurav Kumar vs.high Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~20 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 13, 2018 versus + W.P.(C) 2115/2018 GAURAV KUMAR + W.P.(C) 4384/2018 GOPAL SINGH HIGH COURT OF DELHI versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate Counsel for the respondent: Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr.Rishabh Jetly, Mr. P.Shwetank Singh, Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocate for DHC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % ORDER S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. In both these petitions, the petitioners complain that for the orders terminating their probation from employment as Chauffeur/Drivers, no material has come on record. Both the W.P. (C) No.2115/2018 & 4384/2018 Page 1 of 4 petitioners were employed by the Delhi High Court Establishment at the same time, i.e., in the year 2013. It is emphasized that the work appraisal note issued by the concerned Assistant Registr...
Radico Khaitan Ltd. Vs.shanty Raina & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 52/2015 RADICO KHAITAN LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sagar Chandra, Advocate with Ms. Srijan Uppal, Mr. Ankit Rastogi, Mr. Bibhu Mishira and Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Advocates. ..... Defendants Through Ms. Amal Merin Kurain, Advocate with Ms. Radhika Gupta, Advocate. versus SHANTY RAINA & ORS. % Date of Decision:13. h August, 2018 [CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been listed by the learned Joint Registrar as the defendants had been proceeded ex parte on 26th July, 2017 after the application for discharge filed by the defendants then counsel, was allowed and the plaintiff had closed its evidence on 3rd August, 2018.2. Today, Ms. Amal Merin Kurian, Advocate of M/s Diwan Advocates enters appearance on behalf of the defendant and prays for some time to file an application seeking to set aside the order dated 26th July, 2017, by virtue of which the defendants had been proceeded CS (COMM...
State (Nct) of Delhi vs.rishab Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~35-37 & 39-40 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3780/2016 & Crl.M.A.15813/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus MOMIN @ SABBIR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-3. CRL.M.C. 3781/2016 & Crl.M.A.15817/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. versus SAMIR @ CHUKKAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate /DHCLSC for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3805/2016 & Crl.M.A.15922/2016 STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Vivek, PS Nabi Karim ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 5 + + + versus RAHUL @ RITIK & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.3780/2016 & connected matters + + Through: Mr. Debajyoti Behuria, Advocate for R-1. CRL.M.C. 3879/2016 & Crl.M.A.16306/2016 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »