Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Subhash Infraengineers Pvt Ltd vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~03 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 95/2018 Date of decision:14. h August, 2018 M/S SUBHASH INFRAENGINEERS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Anil Mittal and Ms. Komal Aggarwal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jagjit Singh and Mr. Preet Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This intra-Court appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of the High Courts Act, 2015 and Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A & C Act, for short) impugns order dated 23rd February, 2018 passed in OMP (COMM) No.38/2018 rejecting objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the A & C Act.2. The appellant was awarded work of earth work in filling, embankment and cutting, provision of the blanketing material, FAO (OS) (COMM) No.95/2018 Page 1 of 5 construction of bridges and other works ...
Re-M/S Bharat Carpets Ltd. Vs...........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~CP-7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. 50/1984 Date of decision:14. 08.2018 RE-M/S BHARAT CARPETS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kunal Sharma, Adv. for OL. Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Prema Priyadarshini, Mr. Abhimanyu, Mr.Ashish Shaw and Mr.Shresth Arya, Advs. for the propounder of the Scheme. Mr.Akhilesh Gupta, Applicant-in-person in CA No.880-81/2017 Ms.Bhavna Kohli, Adv. in CA Nos. 656-58/2018 Mr.Sudeep Dey, Adv. for Mr.R.N.Gupta in CA6552018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CA No.442/2012 1. This application is filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of the Scheme of Revival.2. The winding up order was passed against the respondent Company on 18.05.1987. The Official Liquidator was appointed as Provisional Liquidator on 23.08.1984. Subsequently, it appears that there was an agreement/arrangement/understanding that was reached between Mr.Manish Arora, the Managing Director of UCC Care Pv...
Babinder Singh Maan & Ors. Vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~68 & 71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 BABINDER SINGH MAAN & ORS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 4108/2018 DEEPU & ANR ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4096/2018) Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4108/2018) Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sukhbir Singh Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. for R-2 (Crl. M.C. 4096/2018) Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Sukhbir Singh. Mr. Gaurav Bhatt, Adv. for R-2 (Crl. M.C. 4108/2018) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA CRL.M.C. 4096/2018 & 4108/2018 Page 1 of 3 JUDGMENT1408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4096/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.691/2014 under Sections 354/354-B/506/509/3of the IPC at...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.inspector Devendra Rathi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
#102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 CCP (REF) 2/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner versus INSPECTOR DEVENDRA RATHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate (Amicus Curiae with Ms. Shivani Gij, Advocate : Ms. Shradha Karol, Advocate along with Respondent-in-Person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present Reference for Contempt was preceded from the Court of Mr. Ajay Kumar Malik, learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Central-04, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. CCP (REF) 2/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. The Reference was predicated on the violation of the order dated 19.01.2016, whereunder it had been recorded that Inspector Devendra Rathi, Station House Officer Police Station-Sarai Rohilla, at the relevant time, had failed to comply with the directions, issued by the Court vide order dated 15.01.2016, to register an ...
Executive Engineer Cd-Ii vs.m/s j.k. Engineers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 166/2016 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CD-II ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Advocate versus (Mob. No.9999266111) M/S J.K. ENGINEERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep with Mr.Sarthak, Advocates (Mob. No.9654023616) Sharma CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition challenging Award dated 24th June, 2014 passed by the learned Arbitrator.2. The tender for the work Widening of Bridge on Najafgarh Drain at RD53716 (Rajpura Road Bridge) at Vijay Nagar near Christian Colony, Delhi University, North Campus, Part-I (Substructure) Deposit Work was awarded by the... Petitioner to the Respondent as per letter dated 31st March, 2010.3. A formal agreement was entered into between the parties, being agreement No.EE-CD-II/AC/ACMT.No.2/2010-11. Various disputes had arisen between the parties in respect of the claims made by the contractor.4. A sole Arbit...
Sanjay Chandra vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~9&10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : August 14, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5684/2017 RAMESH CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr Vikas Srivastava, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent Through : Mr Zoheb Hossain, Advocate for Revenue. + W.P.(C) 5717/2017 SANJAY CHANDRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr Vikas Srivastava, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr Zoheb Hossain, Advocate for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % The petitioners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seek common relief by way of a direction to the respondent W.P.(C) 5684/2017 & 5717/2017 Page 1 of 9 for quashing the impugned notice dated 30.03.2017 and the impugned order dated 02.05.2017 made under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereafter the Act).2. It is contended that the impugned notice and the...
Rakesh Bhardwaj vs.jai Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~80 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 08.2018 CM(M) 931/2018 & CM APPL. 32738-32739/2018 RAKESH BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Through Mr. B.P. Singh, Mr. Ankur Madav, Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Mr. Vikas Poonia, Mr. Amit Singh, Advs. JAI GUPTA versus ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA % ORDER (ORAL) 14.08.2018 ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 24.04.2018 of the ADJ-05, South, Saket, New Delhi in CS No.91whereby an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed by the applicant herein as defendant thereof was declined, it having been observed inter alia to the effect that for deciding the said application in the CS No.9190/16, the plaintiff has specifically averred that the allegations made against him are defamatory per se. It was also observed vide the said impugned order that the plaint CM(M) 931/2018 Page 1 of 11 disclosed a cause of action on the basis of contents t...
Gopal Singh vs.high Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~20 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 13, 2018 versus + W.P.(C) 2115/2018 GAURAV KUMAR + W.P.(C) 4384/2018 GOPAL SINGH HIGH COURT OF DELHI versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate Counsel for the respondent: Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr.Rishabh Jetly, Mr. P.Shwetank Singh, Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocate for DHC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % ORDER S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. In both these petitions, the petitioners complain that for the orders terminating their probation from employment as Chauffeur/Drivers, no material has come on record. Both the W.P. (C) No.2115/2018 & 4384/2018 Page 1 of 4 petitioners were employed by the Delhi High Court Establishment at the same time, i.e., in the year 2013. It is emphasized that the work appraisal note issued by the concerned Assistant Registr...
Dhani Ram @ Kale & Anr vs.mohd Faisal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.982/2016 % DHANI RAM @ KALE & ANR. 13th August, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shalabh Gupta, Advocate (Mobile No.9818681699). versus MOHD FAISAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Mr. Sanjeeve Kohwal and Mr. Harish K. Mathur, Advocate (Mobile No.9810354910). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 2.7.2016 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondents/plaintiffs. RFA No.982 /2016 Page 1 of 20 2. The disputes pertain to the portions on the ground floor and the first floor of the property bearing No.808, Ward No.X, Bazar Kamra Bangah, Chandni Mahal, Darya Ganj, Delhi, ...
M/S Dish Tv India Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3801/2018 Date of decision:13. 08.2018 % M/S DISH TV INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr A.R.Madav Rao, Ms Pragya Awasthi and Mr Anurag Soan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Ravi Prakash, Mr Farman Ali and Mr Nitish Gupta, Advocates. Mr Sushil Kumar Pandey with Mr Manish Sahay, Advocates for UOI Mr Samar Jain, Standing counsel with Mr Surigya Awasthy and Mr Zora Kumar Gupta, Advocates. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) 1. Service of notice is complete for all the parties. Mr Ravi Prakash, Mr Sushil Kumar Pandey, Mr Samar Jain and Mr Surigya Awasthy, Advocates appear for the respondents. WP(C)3801/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. The petitioner had imported Set Top Boxes (STB) from its foreign supplier; the items attracted Special Additional Duty (SAD), which was paid for goods covered under it. The petitioner cl...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »