Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Speedcrafts Limited vs.the Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2018 + O.M.P. 121/2013 M/S SPEEDCRAFTS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Devmani Bansal, Mr. Ajay Monga, Mr. Amol Sharma and Ms. Jagriti Advocates. (M:9213743613) Ahuja, versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel with for Railways with Mr. Harsh Pandit and Ms. Madhulika Agarwal, Advocates. (M:9958711596) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed challenging the award dated 9th 1. November, 2012 passed by the arbitral tribunal constituted by the Railways.2. The short point that is raised in this case is as to the liability to pay service tax and whether the... Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of the same. The Railways floated a Tender Notice No.Track-2/TM/2002 for Flash Butt Welding. The last date for submission of the bid was 15th January, 2003. The... Petitioner herein, submitted its bid o...
Rahul Wadhwani vs.planman Consulting (I) Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~CP-3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 08.2018 CO.PET. 18/2015 RAHUL WADHWANI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Ms.Mehak Khurana, Mr.Gautam Bajaj adn Mr.Roshan Chawla, Advs. versus PLANMAN CONSULTING (I) PRIVATE LIMITED..... Respondent Through Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Paranjay Chopra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This present petition is filed under sections 433(e) & (f), 434 and 439 1. of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been associated with the Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM) Group of Companies in various capacities since 2009. The petitioner was a senior level managerial personnel and undertook various assignments and offered support to different companies of the group as identified and instructed by the Promoter of the group Mr. Arindam Chaudhuri. On 1.7.2010 the petitioner was retain...
Rajesh Bansal Alias Montu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~R-22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 740/2017 RAJESH BANSAL alias MONTU Through Mr. S.B.Dandapani, Advocate ..... Appellant versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL STATE Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State ..... Respondent JUDGMENT1408.2018 % 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 28th November, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-04, North-West, Rohini in Sessions Case No.16/arising out of FIR No.347/2012 registered at Police Station, North Rohini convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 22nd February, 2017 whereby he was sentenced to imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for a period of two months.2. In the order on sentence, after noticing that the family of the deceased comprised of his mother, wife and two children, the learned trial Judge issued directions to the Del...
Jay Prkash vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~ O~12 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. h August, 2018 + I.A.10633-10635/2017 in TEST.CAS. 50/2011 [ JAY PRKASH Through: Mr.Vinod K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, Mr.Kanak Bose and Mr. Mohit Seth, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) I.A.10635/2017 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. I.A.10633/2017 & 10634/2017 1. The petitioner has filed I.A.10633/2017 seeking restoration of the petition which was dismissed in default on 20th May, 2014. There is delay of 1199 days in seeking restoration for which the petitioner is seeking condonation in I.A.10634/2017.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an illiterate person living in Bhagpat, U.P. and his counsel did not inform him the date of hearing of 20th May, 2014 and, therefore, he did not attend the Court on the said date. It is further submitted that his counsel did not inform the statu...
Hirendra Gupta vs.land & Building Department and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1460/2017 & CM64882018 HIRENDRA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Puri, Ms. Tanya Chawla and Mr.Aditya Bali, Advocates Versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for respondent-L&B Mr. Sanjiv Rajpal and Ms. Kawaljit Kaur, Advocates respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition, a mandamus is sought to respondents to consider the application of petitioner on urgent basis, in view of the scheme for providing developed residential plots in lieu of lands acquired for planned development of Delhi, as a Rehabilitation measure.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that application (Annexure- E) filed by father of petitioner way back in the year 1983 has not been decided by respondent-DDA till date, despite Reminder of 18th May, 2015 (Annexure-K). The opposition to this petition by learned counsel f...
Brij Lal & Sons vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2018. EX.F.A. 21/2016 & CM No.20158/2017 (for direction) BRIJ LAL & SONS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tilak Raj Gogia, partner of appellant. ..... Respondent Versus UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. This Execution First Appeal under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 1st June, 2016 in Execution Petition No.18/2014 of the Court of Additional District Judge-01 (South-East)]. of adjourning sine die the Execution Petition filed by the appellant.2. This appeal came up first before this Court on 19th August, 2016, when Executing Courts record was requisitioned. Vide subsequent order dated 24th January, 2017, notice of the appeal was ordered to be issued. Ms. Sakshi Popli, Advocate for the respondent Union of India (UOI) has been appearing but does not appear today.3. A perusal of the order sheet shows that none appeared for...
Mohd Ashhar vs.zeeshan Zama Khan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 61/2016 Judgment reserved on:10. 07.2018 Judgment pronounced on:14.08.2018 MOHD ASHHAR ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Preeti Gupta, Adv. versus ZEESHAN ZAMA KHAN & ANR Through Mr.Kirti ..... Defendants Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Md.Amanullah, Mr.Mubashi Mushtaq and Mr.Siddharth Chopra, Advs. the defendants. Mr.Rajeev Saxena, Adv. for D-6 to 8 in CS(OS) 1873/2012. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.2023/2016 u/O39R1& 2 CPC) and 2379/2016 (u/O39R4CPC) 1. This suit is filed seeking specific performance, recovery and permanent & Mandatory Injunction and Recovery inter-alia seeking direction for Specific Performance of the Contract dated 07.11.2012 regarding the property, namely, 750 Sq. Yards out of 1000 Sq. Yards being CS(OS) 61/2016 Page 1 of 13 part of Khasra No.372 Min situated in Village Jasola, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi now known as Shaheen Bagh, Abul Fazal Enclave, Part-II, Jam...
Suman K Manhas vs.ranvir Singh , Commissioner, Edmc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
#1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 291/2018 SUMAN K MANHAS versus Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner RANVIR SINGH , COMMISSIONER, EDMC ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. K.L. Manhas, Advocate : Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.32267/2018 (Exemption) Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of accordingly. CONT.CAS.(C) CM APPL.25957/2018 (Directions) 291/2018, CM APPL.32266/2018 (Directions) & 1. The present contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 prays as follows:-"CONT.CAS. (C) 291/2018 Page 1 of 3 of against proceedings In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Honble Court may graciously be pleased to initiate contempt Court the respondent/contemnor for willfully disobeying and defying its order ...
Smt. Poonam (Now Deceased) Through Lrs vs.sh. Pradeep Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.107/2017 Reserved on:9. h August, 2018 Pronounced on:14. h August, 2018 % SMT. POONAM (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. versus SH. PRADEEP TYAGI ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit(legal heirs of the original defendant Smt. Poonam, who was the wife and mother of the present appellants) impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 17.12.2016 by which trial court has decreed the suit for specific performance filed by the respondent/plaintiff with respect to the Agreement to Sell dated 4.12.2007 for the suit property being the first floor of property no.A-3/60, khasra no.76/10, in the RFA No.107/2017 Page 1 of 12 revenue estate of Village Hastsal, Delhi abadi now known as U...
Worlds Window Infrastructure & Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Warehous ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h July, 2018 Date of Decision:14. h August, 2018 ARB.P. 437/2018 & IA No.7725/2018 O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 45/2018 & IA No.7727/2018 + + WORLDS WINDOW INFRASTRUCTURE & LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Prashant Mehta, Mr.Ashutosh Shukla, Mr.Gaurav Malik, Ms.Neeharika Aggarwal, Mr.Dhritiman Roy, Advs. versus CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, ASG with Mr.Shaiwal Srivastava, Ms.Aayeshi Agarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This is a classic case of how a party can delay the arbitration proceedings on one pretext or another by filing repeated petitions thereby defeating the very purpose of an Arbitration Agreement.2. The petitioner has filed Arbitration Petition No.437/2018 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) making the following prayers:-"ARB. P. 437/2018 & O.M.P. (...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »