Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Manjeet Sehrawat vs.land and Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 16, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10511/2017 1. SHRI MANJEET SEHRAWAT Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) This is second round of litigation. In the first round of litigation, vide order of 13th May, 2014 (Annexure P-4) a Coordinate Bench of this Court granted three weeks time to petitioner to file requisite documents. On account of non-submission of the requisite documents within three weeks, petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land, has been dismissed vide order of 24th July, 2014 (Annexure P-8).2. Counsel for petitioner submits that the requisite documents could not be submitted within a period of three weeks due to circumstances beyond the control of petitioner.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to d...
Suresh Sharma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~14 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9169/2017 & CM No.27311/2018 % 1. SURESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Nirmal Mishra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Kamaldeep, Adv. for R-1 Ms.Tamali Wad with Ms.Soumya Jain, Advs. for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The prayers in this writ petition read thus: A. Issue writ certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside the letter/order dated 22.01.2016 issued by the Registrar, NSD. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ directing B. the respondent No.2 & 3 to place the petitioner in the category of Faculty member in terms of appointment letter dated 20.08.1999. 2. Ms. Tamali Wad, learned counsel for Respondent No.2, submits that her client has no objection in treating the petitioner as a faculty member. She, however, further submits that, even if the petitioner were to be treated ...
Kirti Sharma vs.nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~5 & 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2288/2015 and Crl. M.A. 8642/2015 KIRTI SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Jain and Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Advocates versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State Ms. Meenakshi S. Devgan, Advocate for R-2 + CRL.M.C. 4756/2015 and Crl. M.A. 17177/2015 G K SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Jain and Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Advocates versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State Ms. Meenakshi S. Devgan, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) no.67/2013 was registered by police station Maya Puri on 13.03.2013 involving offences punishable Crl. M.C. Nos.2288/2015 & 4756/2015 Page 1 of 5 under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC on the complaint of the second respondent. The investigation into the said FIR was completed and a report under Se...
Amar Singh @ Angad vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1036/2018 AMAR SINGH @ ANGAD STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Anand Maheshwari, Advocate. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with IO. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1408.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.166/2010 under Sections 363/370/3of the IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi.2. As per the allegations in the FIR, the prosecutrix was kidnapped in the year 2010 allegedly by the petitioner who then delivered the prosecutrix to a co-accused. The prosecutrix was recovered in the year 2016 and is alleged to have identified the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. BAIL APPLN. 1036/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that t...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.srin Niwas Shukla & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 14, 2018 + MAC.APP. 312/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate Versus SRIN NIWAS SHUKLA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Saquib Arbab and Mr. Abhishek Grover, Advocates for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 + MAC.APP. 66/2018 SRI NIWAS SHUKLA ..... Appellant Through: Versus Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Saquib Arbab and Mr. Abhishek Grover, Advocates for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 22nd January, 2013 grants compensation of 10,37,140/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to Sri Niwas, aged 49 years MAC.APPs. 312/2013 & 66/2018 Page 1 of 7 (hereinafter referred to as Injured) on account of grievous injury suffered by him in ...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.jugnu Jayant
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 79/2017 and CM No.13679/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr. ..... Appellants Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Shipra Shukla and Mr.Narayan Dev Parashar, Advocates versus JUGNU JAYANT ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Akshit Mago, Mr. Chetan Rai Wahi and Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This intra Court appeal under Section 37 (1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('A & C Act' for short) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns judgement dated 10.01.2017 passed by learned Single Judge in O.M.P. (Comm.) No.147/2016 allowing objections preferred by Jugnu Jayant ('the respondent', for short) under Section 34 of the A & C Act and setting aside the Award dated 05.05.2015...
Jugal Kishore vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:14. h August, 2018 * % + W.P.(C) 11514/2016 JUGAL KISHORE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Kr. Kaushik, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Sen Gupta Advs for LAC/L&B Ms.Mrinalini and Ms.Niharika Jauhar, Advocates for DDA. Mr.Hemant Gupta and Ms.Sunakshi Gupta, Advocates for R-5/DMRC with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Senior Law Officer, DMRC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 1/4th share of the land of the petitioner, total measuring 04 Bighas 13 Biswas comprised in Khasra Nos. 445(02-1) and 447(02-12), situated in the revenue estate of Village Jasola, Tehsil Sarita Vihar, District South-East, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land...
Sumant vs.punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of pronouncement:14. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7586/2016 SUMANT PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: Mr. Jagat Arora, Adv. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. O.P. Gehlot, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 1. In the 31st December, 2014 edition of the Veer Arjun daily, the respondent Bank issued an advertisement, inviting applications for the post of peon. Selection was to be on the basis of interview.2. Clause 11 (iii) of the advertisement set out the manner in which applications were to be made, and read as under: of copies Self-certified educational certificates/service book/Experience Certificate/ Certificate of category to which one belongs/ discharge certificate should be enclosed with the application. In case of OBC, the certificate must contain the caste of the candidate as recognized under various orders/ instructions of the Ministry of Welfare, Govt. of India and should also certify ...
U P State Road Transport Corporation vs.vibhor Fialok & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 14, 2018 + MAC.APP. 976/2017 & CM406032017 U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ....Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate versus VIBHOR FIALOK & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates + MAC.APP. 585/2018 VIBHOR FIALOK Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates ..... Appellant 1. versus KRISHAN DEV & ANR Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 8th June, 2017 grants compensation of `4,24,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum to a private employee-Vibhor, aged 28 years (hereinafter referred to as Injured) on account of grievous MAC.App.976/2017 & 585/2018 Page 1 of 7 injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 4th August, 2014.2. In the above captioned first appeal, the Owner of Bus in q...
Praveen Gupta & Anr vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2018
$~6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2439/2015 PRAVEEN GUPTA & ANR Through: Mr. Vaibhav Sethi, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint of Smt. Vimla Gupta, the mother of the second respondent, presented on 28.03.2012, the petitioners were summoned as accused for offences punishable under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) after an inquiry under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The complainant is described as mother of the second petitioner, the first petitioner being the husband of the second petitioner and, thus, the son-in-law to her. After the petitioners had appeared, the Metropolitan Magistrate proceeded to put the case through the procedure prescribed for warrant trial cases in the course of whic...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »