Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mrinal Ranjan vs.airport Authority of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~16 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. h August, 2018 LPA982018 MRINAL RANJAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Keshav Dayal, Sr. Adv with Mr. Sheo Kumar Gupta, Adv versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Kustubh Singh, Advs for AAI/R-1 Ms Anjana Gosain, Adv for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 05.01.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court. The appellant herein seeks parity with the petitioners in W.P.(C) 685/2011 i.e. Ankit Kumar Aggarwal & Ors. vs. Airport Authority of India & Anr. and further seeks to avail the benefit of the order dated 09.04.2015 which has attained finality as the order was upheld by the Division Bench and the Special Leave Petition filed was also dismissed.2. Some necessary facts which are required to be noticed for disposal of this appeal...
Sonu Yadav vs.state ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 2779/2018 SONU YADAV versus ........ Petitioner STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Lalit Bhardwaj, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State. Mr. Raghav Chaddha with Ms. Priyanshu Sharma, Advocates for R-2 Ms. Jaya Yadav, Sr. Manager, Legal, BSES. JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.557/2016 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Mehrauli, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to an inspection. A direct theft bill of Rs.2,13,619/- was raised. The matter was referred to Special Lok Adalat. Thereafter, the said amount was settled at Rs.1,01,000/-. The petitioner has already deposited the entire...
Sher Singh & Ors vs.jai Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16th August, 2018 CS(OS) 3603/2014 & I.As. 23434/2014, 10768/2015, 4216/2016, 1118/2018 SHER SINGH & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram & Mr. Avinash, Advocate (M-9555913622). Versus JAI SINGH Through: Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Ms. Anjali Sharma & Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocates (M-9810001275). ..... Defendant CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit filed for permanent injunction. The brief background is that Lt. Sh. Risal Singh is the predecessor-in-interest of the parties and was karta of the HUF. He was a resident of 257, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi. It is averred that various agricultural lands and plots were purchased by the Joint Hindu Family through its karta, in the name of HUF. However, the same have not been partitioned.2. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiffs seeking the following prayers: i. Partitioning the Open land adjacent to the temple measuring 460...
Sunita Rani vs.ravinder Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~7 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"16th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 3242/2015 SUNITA RANI Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta & Mr. P.S. ........ Petitioner versus Rana, Advs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sumit Choudhary & Ms. Aakansha Bansal, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Karamvir, PS Narela. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. By order dated 22.07.2013, the Metropolitan Magistrate brought the curtain down on the criminal case initiated by the petitioner. The said order was challenged before the court of Sessions invoking its revisional jurisdiction by filing petition (CR.No.07/2014) but having been upheld by order dated 01.12.2014. The petitioner consequently has come up to this Court praying for exercise of its inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) and Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting the said orders at naught and reviving the proceed...
Dinesh Kumar Kundra vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 1773/2018 DINESH KUMAR KUNDRA versus THE STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Mr.A.K.Tripathi, Advocate. Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Rajender Singh, P.S.Malviya Nagar. Ms.Ananya Bhattacharya and Mr.Badri Dass, Advs. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.6353/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL. M.C. 1773/2018 & Crl.M.A.6352/2018 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 23.08.2015 whereby right of the petitioner to lead defence evidence has been closed. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was CRL.M.C. 1773/2018 Page 1 of 5 apprehending arrest and as such could not appear before the Court for leading his evidence. He got bail on 13.06.2017 and therea...
Shri Mahender Singh vs.govt. Of N. C. T. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 16, 2018 SHRI MAHENDER SINGH + W.P.(C) 988/2018 & C.M. 4164/2018 Versus GOVT. OF N. C. T. OF DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh K. Daksh, Advocate Through: Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land stood rejected by respondent vide order of 16th December, 2014 (Annexure P-9) while noting that second page of the application form is not there.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had applied under the Right to Information Act, 2005 to obtain copy of his application form and on 20th January, 2012, petitioner was supplied copy of his application form (Annexure P-2 colly), which reveals that second page of the application is very much there. It is submitted by petitioners counsel that may be during transmission of petitioners application, its second page migh...
Naveen & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4138/2018 NAVEEN & ORS. THE STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Mr.D.D.Sharma and Mr.Digvijay, Advs. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with SI Pratap Singh, PS Punjabi Bagh Mr.Sheetanshu Shekhar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 30100/2018(Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4138/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.384 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC, Police Station Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi, based on a settlement. Subject FIR emanates out of a matrimonial discord.... Petitioners and respondent No.2 who appears in person submit that 2.3. CRL.M.C. 4138/2018 Page 1 of 2 they have settled their disputes before the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Tis Hazari...
Delhi State Industrial & Infarastructure Development Corporation Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:16. 08.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 259/2017 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFARASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Moni Cinmoy and Mr.Arvind Pandey, Advs. Mr.Jatinder Kumar, EE (Civil). BLS SUMER JV versus Through Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Mr.D.Kishore Kumar and Mr.Arvind Sharma, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.7576/2017 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 259/2017 & IA No.7575/2017 1. Present petition is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to challenge the Award dated 3.3.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that the respondent was awarded the work of Integrated Infrastructure of 28 Govt. Schools in East Delhi on 1.10.2009. The stipulated date of start of the contract was 25.10.2009. The work was to be completed within 12...
Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.army Welfare Housing ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$-23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16th August, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 327/2018 RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. Through Mr.Narendera M.Sharma, Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Ms.Prachi Gupta and Ms.Pavitra Singh, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION (AWHO) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.A.K. Tewari and Mr.Vikramaditya Singh, Advs. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) CAV.735/2018 As counsel for the respondent enters appearance, caveat stands discharged. I.A.No.10913/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 327/2018 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner inter-alia seeking the following reliefs: OMP (I)(COMM) 327/2018 Page 1 (a) Appoint a Local Commissioner preferably an Architect or Civil Engineer to visit the Site at Sector-95, Village Wazir...
Sangeeta Gera vs.sanjeev Gera
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~48 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. h August, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 42/2018 SANGEETA GERA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Aman Mehta, Advocate SANJEEV GERA versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rishi Kapoor and Mr. Satish Rai, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL32700/2018(early hearing), CM.APPL66722018(delay) & MAT.APP.(F.C.) 42/2018 1. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking early hearing. The application was listed on 14.08.2018. Learned counsel for the appellant had submitted that since the appellate court has fixed the matter for final hearing on 10.09.2018, the matter be taken up on an earlier date. Accordingly, notice was issued to the respondent through counsel. We may note that the present appeal is directed against the order dated 23.11.2017 passed by the Family Court. Together with the appeal, an application being CM.APPL66722018 has been filed seek...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »