Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.raj Rishi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 16, 2018 + MAC.APP. 975/2017 & CM405462017 + MAC.APP. 978/2017 & CM406172017 1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus RAJ RISHI & ORS. Through: Nemo .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 5th September, 2017 rendered by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to respondents-Claimants, on account of death of a Teacher-Mahender S/o Harphool, aged 59 years and 3 months, and a housewife-Shakuntala w/o Mahender, aged 53 years, in a vehicular accident, which took place on 17th June, 2015.2. The factual background of this case, as noticed in the impugned Award, is as under:-"Mr. Mahender Singh Maurya and his wife Smt. Shakuntala Devi (the deceased) suffered injuries in a motor-vehicular accident that occurred on 17.06.2015 at 4.30 a.m. at NH-24, opposite Siddharth Vihar MAC.AP...
Akshaya Kumar Panda vs.ganga International School & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :16. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1516/2016 % AKSHAYA KUMAR PANDA Through : Mr. Ashok Agarwal and ........ Petitioner versus Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Advs. GANGA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ORS...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Tamim and Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Adv. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Respondent No.1 is a recognized, unaided private school (hereinafter referred to as the school).2. The petitioner, in his writ petition, claimed to have been employed, since 2nd July, 2001, as Dance Teacher in the school, and to have been made permanent from 1st July, 2005.3. In November, 2013, the petitioner resigned. He was issued an experience certificate, certifying that he had served the school since 14th July, 2004.4. The petitioner, in this writ petition, contends that he was entitled to revised pay and emoluments, as per the 5th Central Pay W.P...
Raj Narayan Sharma vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. h August, 2018 + BAIL APPLN. 1910/2018 & CRL.M.A. 30057/2018 RAJ NARAYAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Jain with Mr. M.M. Khan & Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Arun Kumar, P.S. Bhajanpura. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The material indicating involvement of the petitioner in the incident which is subject matter of first information report (FIR) no.278/2018 of police station Bhajan Pura involving offences punishable under Sections 307, 145, 147, 148, 149, 186, 353 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 has come up during investigation. The petitioner, apprehending arrest, had earlier approached the court of Sessions by moving an application for anticipatory bail which was declined by order da...
Laxmi Memorial Public School vs.suresch Chand Gupta and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6843/2017 & CM No.28474/2017 % 1. LAXMI MEMORIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL ....... Petitioner Through Mr.Pramod K. Verma, Adv. versus SURESCH CHAND GUPTA AND ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Kiran Yadav, Adv. for R-1 Mr.Gautam with Ms.Mahamaya Chaterjee and Ms.Shivani Vij, Advs. for R-2GNCTD Narayan, ASC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition challenges order, dated 26th April, 2014, passed by the learned Delhi School Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), on an appeal preferred, before it, by the respondent herein.2. The respondent approached the Tribunal, submitting that he had been working with the petitioner-School (hereinafter referred to as the School), as Assistant Teacher since 1999, without interruption, on meagre wages of Rs. 3,500/- per month, without being paid benefits under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 or the Employees Provident Fu...
Abhishek Jain & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4120/2018 ABHISHEK JAIN & ORS ........ Petitioners STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Ms.Sofia Bhambri, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, , APP for the State with SI Kapil Khakhar, P.S.Farsh Bazar. Mr. Mayank Khera, Advocate for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30029/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4120/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.367/2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC read with Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Farsh Bazar, Delhi. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 4120/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the...
Krishan Gopal vs.prahlad Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d August, 2018 Date of Decision:16. h August, 2018 KRISHAN GOPAL CS (OS) 1537/2014 ..... Plaintiff PRAHLAD KUMAR Through: Mr. Anil Gera, Advocate. versus (M:9810195475) ..... Defendant Through: Mr. S. C. Singhal, Advocate. (M:9810061558) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff, Shri Krishan Gopal (hereinafter Plaintiff) and Defendant, Shri Prahlad Kumar (hereinafter Defendant) are the sons of late Shri Raghu Nath Sahai who was the owner of B-198, Maharana Pratap Enclave, Pitam Pura, Delhi-110034 admeasuring 308.33 square yards. The lease deed signed by the DDA in favour of Shri Raghu Nath Sahai, in respect of the said plot is duly registered. Shri Sahai passed away, intestate, on 16th October, 1985. He was survived by two sons, three daughters and his widow at the time of his death.2. The widow of Shri Sahai, Smt. Naraini Devi and the three daughters, Smt. Bimla Devi, Smt. Geeta Devi and...
Daljit Singh vs.inderjit Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :31st July, 2018 Date of decision :16th August, 2018 RFA8752016, CMs APPL.8942/2017, 8994/2017, 15331/2017 & 22338/2018 SARDAR DALJIT SINGH & ORS ..Appellants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender Kapur, Mr. Sagar Chawla, Ms. Manisha Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Advocates. (M:9810229189) Shekher, versus SARDAR INDERJIT SINGH KHUMAN ..Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shobhana Takial, Advocate. (M:9810962950) + DALJIT SINGH & ORS WITH RFA382017 ..Appellants Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender Kapur, Mr. Sagar Chawla, Ms. Manisha Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Shekher, Advocates. INDERJIT SINGH & ANR versus ..Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shobhana Takial, Advocate. (M:9810962950) + DALJIT SINGH RFA392017 ..Appellant Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitender Kapur, Mr. Sagar Chawla, Ms. Manisha Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Shekher...
Magppie International Ltd. & Ors. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~6, 13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 9898/2017 & CM403382017, 43024/2017 PRIYANKA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Alok Yadav, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Gigi C.George, Senior Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel for R-2 & 3. + W.P.(C) 10314/2017 & CM420552017 SUNDER IMPEX PVT. LTD & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Abhas Mishra and Ms Seema Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocate for R-1. Mr Harpreet Singh, Advocate for R-2. WP(C) 9898/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + W.P.(C) 454/2018 & CM19462018 MAGPPIE INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr Prashant Srivastava, Ms Malabika Sarkar and Mr Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGS...
Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited vs.m/s Il & Fs Engineering & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 8.2018 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 164/2018 PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma with Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jha, Mr. Pragyan V. Mishra and Ms. Monika Jain, Advs M/S IL & FS ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent versus Through: Mr. Abhishek Singh with Mr. A.N. Mahajan, Mr. Abhisit Mishra and Mr. Rohan Dhariwal, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. Notice in this petition was issued on 23.07.2018.2. On return of notice, Mr. Abhishek Singh has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent.3. The relevant part of the order dated 23.07.2018 is extracted herein:-"2. Mr. Sharma says that the petitioner is a public sector undertaking and therefore, cannot pay the fee which has been fixed by the Arbitral Tribunal.3. It appears that an application for revision of fee was moved by the petitioner which was disposed of vide...
Ankit Rathore & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1996/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 ANKIT RATHORE & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Ms.Niti Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Manisha Sharma, P.S.Aman Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1665 of 2015 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes by way of a settlement before the Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts dated 08.01.2015 which has been executed between the parties. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 5,50,000...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »