Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madan Mohan vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9071/2018 & C.M. Nos. 34926-928/2018 MADAN MOHAN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Shankar Raju with Mr.Nilansh Gaur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2908.2018 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 25.07.2018, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing OA No.2759/2018 filed by him challenging the charge-sheet issued to him by the respondent proposing to impose a major penalty on him. Further, the petitioner has assailed an order dated 20.08.2018, passed by the Tribunal dismissing Review Application No.139/2018 filed by him seeking review of the order dated 25.07.2018.2. It may be noted at the outset that this is the second round of litigation that the petitioner has initiated in the High Court. Prior thereto, aggrieved by the order dated 25.07.2018 p...
Jai Bhagwan and Anr. Vs.land and Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 29, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6225/2018 1. JAI BHAGWAN AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Mr. Amit Dhankhar, Advocates Versus LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 29th September, 2017 (Annexure P-1) rejects petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that the requisite documents have not been supplied.2. Learned counsel for petitioners draws attention of this Court to a copy of petitioners letter of 30th June, 2017 (Annexure P-5) to show that the requisite documents have been supplied to respondent. It is also submitted on behalf of petitioners that if there is still any deficiency, then the documents sought would be furnished to respondent.3. At this stage, learned counsel for respondent points out that copy of...
Chhutka & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4198/2018 CHHUTKA & ORS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE & ANR + CRL.M.C. 4200/2018 ANISH ALI THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. D.K. Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Ms. Savita Singh and Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advs. (Crl. M.C. 4198/2018) Mr. Satwant, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4200/2018) for R-2 Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vipin Kumar Mr. Satwant, Adv. 4198/2018) for R-2 (Crl. M.C. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vipin Kumar Mr. D.K. Singh, Mr. Pankaj Chauhan, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Ms. Savita Singh and Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advs. (Crl. M.C. 4200/2018) for R-2 CRL.M.C. 4198/2018 & 4200/2018 Page 1 of 4 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2908.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL...
Jeevan Kumar vs.estate Officer, Directorate of Estates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~2 * + W.P.(C) 5247/2018 & CM No.20366/2018 (for stay) JEEVAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Bijay Kumar, Advs. Versus ESTATE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Harvesh Kumar, Assistant Director and Mr. Tilak Raj, ASO of DOE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER2908.2018 This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India % 1. impugns the order [dated 1st May, 2018 in CIS-PPA-4-2017 (CNR-DLST01002396-2017) of the Court of the District Judge (South) acting as the Appellate Officer under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act)]. of dismissal of the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order [dated 14th March, 2017 of the respondent Estate Officer]. in exercise of powers under Section 5 of the Act, of eviction of the petitioner from Quarter No.13, Block-72, Sector-1, M.B. Road ...
Priyank Shrarma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
#63,70,71 & 72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2018 W.P.(C) 8207/2018 PRIYANK SHRARMA versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8247/2018 MAHESH KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER BHOOP SINGH GURJAR ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8248/2018 SANCHIT KAPOOR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8252/2018 KARTIK SINGH SAWHNEY versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 8207/2018, W.P.(C) 8247/2018, W.P.(C) 8248/2018 & W.P.(C) 8252/2018 Page 1 of 6 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Manu Beri, Mr. Prasenjit Keswani and Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Advocates in W.P.(C) 8207/2018 Mr. Jeetender Gupta, Advocate in W.P.(C) 8247/2018, 8248/2018 & 8252/20 Mr. Ruchir Mishra, and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for UOI Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal and M...
R K Jain vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2018 + LPA3692018 R K JAIN Through: Mr.T.Sudhakar, Adv. with Mr.Govind Jee, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr.Aditya Madaan, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT Rajendra Menon, Chief Justice (Oral) C.M.No.27556/2018 (exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions C.M.No.27555/2018 (delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the application is disposed of. LPA No.369/2018 1. Seeking exception to an order passed on 08.05.2018 by the learned writ Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the petitioner, this appeal has been filed. The facts in brief indicate that on 19.10.2013, the appellant had filed an application seeking information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPI...
Kamla Sharma vs.varun Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:29. 08.2018 RC REV.145/2016 KAMLA SHARMA Through Versus VARUN GUPTA Petitioner Mr.Ajay Kumar, Adv. Respondent Through Mr.Manish Kumar and Mr.Ashwani Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) against the order dated 15.7.2015 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC) allowing the application for leave to defend filed by the respondent/tenant.2. The Eviction Petition was filed by the petitioner for eviction of the tenanted premises i.e. one room/godown in the basement of property No.116-A, Kamla Nagar, Delhi-110007.3. The petitioner has filed three separate eviction petitions against three separate tenants occupying separate rooms in the same property. The Eviction Petition is based on common questions of fact and law. A per...
Ram Bachhan vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 370/2018 RAM BACHHAN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Umesh Sinha, Mr. Anil K. Singh and Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State and Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP with Inspector Vikramjit Singh and SI Ravi Saini, PS Prasad Nagar. Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, petitioner challenges the order dated 26th March, 2018 whereby the Juvenile Justice Board discharged the respondent No.2 for offence punishable under Sections 304A/2IPC registered at PS Prasad Nagar.2. The above noted FIR was registered on the complaint of petitioner who stated that he had four daughters and two sons. His son Vinod aged about 18-19 years was employed in Delhi by his neighbours son Dilip. Respondent No.2 also came to Delhi wit...
Smt. Kasturi vs.land and Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 29, 2018 W.P.(C) 6175/2018 SMT. KASTURI Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Mr. Amit ........ Petitioner Versus Dhankhar, Advocates LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 27th January, 2017 (Annexure P-1) rejects petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that the requisite documents have not been supplied.2. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to petitioners letter of 30th September, 2016 (Annexure P-7) wherein petitioner had sought time to obtain and furnish the requisite documents. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after the receipt of the requisite documents, the same have been supplied to respondent on the day of the passing of the impugned order i.e. 27th January, 2017. However, it appea...
Nikhil Sehgal & Anr vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2018
$~13 & 14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. h August, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 904/2018 RAVINDER KUMAR SEHGAL Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 927/2018 NIKHIL SEHGAL & ANR. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma and Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocates for... Petitioners. Mr. Tarang Srivastava, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Suneel Siddhu, P.S. Parliament Street. Mr. Karan Preet Singh, Advocate for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This petition under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks release of the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in case FIR No.103/2017 dated 16.09.2017 Bail Appln. Nos.904 & 927 of 2018 Page 1 of 8 under sections 406/420/467/468/471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Parliament Street, New Delhi.2. The ab...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »