Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hi Line Airtel Connect vs.shilpi Das Barman & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h July, 2018 FAO2342012 & CM APPLs. 28073-28074/2017, 46014/2017 HI LINE AIRTEL CONNECT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Jatinder Bhalla, proprietor of Appellant versus SHILPI DAS BARMAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Piyush Sachdev, Advocate for R-1 Mr.R.K. Nain, Advocate for LRs of R- 1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT CM No.28074/2017 1. Delay is condoned. Application disposed of. CM No.28073/2017 2. Application allowed. The daughter of deceased respondent nos.2 and 3 is substituted in place of respondent nos. 2 and 3. FAO2342012 3. The appellant has challenged the order dated 09th May, 2012 whereby the Commissioner, Employees Compensation awarded compensation of Rs.4,15,960/- and funeral expenses of Rs.2,500/- to the respondents.4. On 08th April, 2003, Abhijit Das Burman met with an accident while FAO2342012 Page 1 of 8 driving a scooter which resulted in f...
Manish Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2563/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2018 MANISH KUMAR YADAV & ORS THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Vijay Sansanwal, Advocate with petitioners in person. For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. SI Shri Narayan, PS Karol Bagh. JUDGMENT3007.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.932/2014, under Sections 392/3IPC, Police Station Karol Bagh.2. The allegations against the petitioners are that the petitioners had approached the complainant for purchase of cell phones. When the complainant was showing them the cell phones, sitting in their car, they sped away taking the complainant and the cell phones. They CRL.M.C. 2563/2018 Page 1 of 3 later on threatened the complainant, kept the cell phones, and thereafter dumped the complaina...
r.s Aggarwal & Ors. Vs.p.k. Aggarwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :17. h July, 2018 Date of decision :30th July, 2018 + CS (COMM) 331/2018 & I.A. 7953/2018 R.S AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Geetanjali Visvanathan and Ms. Asavari Jain, Advocates. (M:9765097954) P.K. AGGARWAL & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhik Kumar and Mr. Rinku for D-1. Mathur, Advocates (M:9953971709) Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate for D-2. (M:9810737362) Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Gupta, Ms. Alka Chojar and Ms. Meenakshi Garg, Advs for D-3. (M:9811669899) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 5758/2018 (u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. Plaintiff No.1 Mr. R. S. Aggarwal (hereinafter, author), is an author of mathematics books prescribed for students in schools and colleges, and has authored over 100 academic books. He has also co-authored some books with Plaintiff Nos.2 & 3, who are his brothers and which are prescribed at various levels...
Pankaj Sharma vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : July 30, 2018 CRL.A. 255/2015 PANKAJ SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Mirza Hasan Beg and Mr.Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 270/2015 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Choudhary, Ms.Puja Shrivastava and Mr.Anil Choudhary, Advocates for appellant no.1. Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for appellant no.2. versus Crl.A.255,270,302,312,329,418of2015 Page 1of 75 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 302/2015 A...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.harak Singh Rawat & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 + MAC. APP. 254/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus HARAK SINGH RAWAT & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur and Mr. Parveen Dutt, Advocates + MAC. APP. 1182/2013 HARAK SINGH RAWAT & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur and Mr. Parveen Dutt, Advocates 1. Versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD AND ANR Through: Mr. Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 21st November, 2012 grants compensation of `3,56,100/- with interest @ 9% per annum to injured-Harak Singh, aged 39 years, on account of grievous injury suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 4th September, 2004.2. In the above captioned first appeal, Insurer pleads lack of negligence of driver of Insured vehicle i.e....
M/S Amrit Estate (P) Ltd vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 982/2017 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through: Mr. Jagdish Sagar, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner SHRI IRMEET SINGH KOHLI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. + W.P.(C) 6274/2017 & CM No.25985/2017 M/S AMRIT ESTATE (P) LTD Through: Mr. Ashish Garg, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagdish Sagar, Adv. Ms. Eshita Baruah, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 M/s Amrit Estate (Pvt.) Ltd., petitioner in W.P.(C) 6274/2017 is respondent in W.P.(C)982/2017. For the sake of convenience, M/s Amrit Estate (Pvt.) Ltd. is referred to as the petitioner and South Delhi Municipal Corporation is referred to as Corporation. W.P.(C) Nos. 982/2017 & 6274/2017 Page 1 of 12 2. The petitioner is the owner of property No.E-1A, Kailash Colony, New Delhi. After the intro...
Varun Mehlawat & Anr. Vs.piyoosh Gupta & Ors (The National Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 598/2017 Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ..... Appellant VARUN MAHLAWAT & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira + MAC.APP. 601/2017 Arora, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus VARUN MAHLAWAT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira + MAC.APP. 651/2017 Arora, Advocates VARUN MEHLAWAT & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira Arora, Advocates Versus PIYOOSH GUPTA & ORS (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 598/2017 MAC.APP. 601/2017 MAC.APP. 651/2017 MAC.APP. 655/2017 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 655/2017 1. VARUN MEHLAWAT & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira Arora, Advocates Versus PIYOOSH GUPTA & ORS. (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate...
Deepak Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3728/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2018 DEEPAK SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Nimish Chib, Advocate. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State Mr. Nagendra Singh and Mr. Jitender, Advs. for respondent/complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3007.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28727/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3728/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.809 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406 of the IPC Police Station Uttam Nagar, New Delhi, based on a settlement arrived at before the Delhi Mediation CRL.M.C. 3728/2018 Page 1 of 3 Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 28.02.2018. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submi...
Kla Construction Technologies Pvt Ltd vs.chadha Sugar and Industries P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :16. h July, 2018 Date of decision :30th July, 2018 CS (COMM) 1033/2016 & CC(COMM) 57/2017 KLA CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD Through: Mr. Arjun Dewan, Advocate. versus ..... Plaintiff CHADHA SUGAR AND INDUSTRIES PVT LTD AND ANOTHER ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr. Nayar Dubey, Advocates for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for Defendant No.1 CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The Plaintiff- M/s KLA Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter KLA) filed the present suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.22,49,538/- against M/s Chadha Sugar and Industries Pvt. Ltd-Defendant No.1 (hereinafter Chadha) and M/s Adie Broswon Breweries Pvt. Ltd. Defendant No.2 (hereinafter Adie Broswon). According to KLA, Adie Broswon wanted to set up a Brewery in Batala, Gurdaspur District, Punjab and it floated a tender on 20th August, 2010. The Plaintiff had submitted a bid for a sum of Rs.13,57,95,046/- i...
Goyal Gases p.ltd. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~14 & 15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h July, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3002/2015 and Crl. MA107202015 SURESH CHAND GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocates versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing Counsel, Income Tax CRL.M.C. 3016/2015 and Crl. MA107412015 GOYAL GASES P.LTD. + + STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing Counsel, Income Tax CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. A prosecution launched by the second respondent in 1993 alleging offences punishable under Sections 276 C (1) and 277 of Income Tax Act, 1961 continues to hang fire on the file of the Crl.MC3002/2015 & 3016/2015 Page 1 of 4 Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) till date, the petitions at hand, besides others, also being t...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »