Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rahul @ Kake @ Raju vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h July, 2018 CRL.A. 729/2017 RAHUL @ KAKE @ RAJU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 748/2017 State with Insp.Balbir Singh, PS Vijay Vihar VINOD KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the ..... Respondent State with Insp.Balbir Singh, PS Vijay Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeals, the appellants challenge the impugned judgment dated 31st May, 2017 convicting them for the offence punishable under Section 304 (Part I) IPC read with Section 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 9th June, 2017 directing them to undergo rigorous CRL.A. 729/2017 & CRL.A. 748/2017 Page 1 of 11 imprisonment for a period of ten years each and to pay a fine of 10,000/- each and in default of payment of fi...
Leena Roy Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3729/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2018 LEENA ROY CHAUDHARY & ORS THE STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Raj Kapoor, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Anjani Kumar Singh Mr. Raghav Chadha, Advocate. for R-2/BSES Mr. Pradeep Basoya, Advocate for complainant JUDGMENT3007.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.545 of 2017 under Section 135-A of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Vasant Kunj (South) New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to a raid conducted at the house of the petitioner and a direct theft bill was raised. It is submitted that the parties have settled the disputes and a final settlement was arrived at Rs. 19,542/-. The CRL....
Dulal Chand Nandi Decd Thr Lrs vs.kiran Bala Mehru & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :13. July, 2018 Date of decision :30th July, 2018 + RFA1292010 & CM APPL. 12468/2018 DULAL CHAND NANDI DECD THR LRS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Mehta, Mr. N. Raja Singh & Mr. Ram Mehar Advocates (M- 9818023754). KIRAN BALA MEHRU & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.N. Haksar, Senior Advocate with Mr. U.A. Rana, Mr. Himanshu Mehta & Ms. Sitwat Nabi, Advocates (M-7838353242). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 An agreement to sell was entered into on 12th May, 1983 for the sale of property bearing No.C-14A and C-15, Kailash Colony, New Delhi. As per the agreement, Sh. Dulal Chand Nandi-Defendant No.1, the owner had agreed to sell the property admeasuring 696.96 sq yards for a consideration of Rs.16 lakhs to Smt. Savitri Jain-Defendant No.2 and Mrs. Kiran Bala Mehru-Plaintiff. A sum of Rs.1 lakh was paid towards part payment of the total sale consideration. The contents of the agreemen...
Future Generali India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.rashmika Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate + MAC.APP. 979/2016 & CM436002016 + MAC.APP. 981/2016 & CM436722016 + MAC.APP. 982/2016 & CM437092016 + MAC.APP. 985/2016 & CM438782016 Versus UMESH CHAND JAIN & ORS RASHMIKA JAIN & ORS SWATI JAIN & ORS AJAY KUMAR JAIN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh and Mr. Rakesh Satija, Advocates for respondents-Claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 24th September, 2016 rendered by Motor 1. Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to respondents-Claimants on account of death of a businessman-Ashish S/o Rajender Kumar Jain, aged 34 years; a Senior Finance Officer-Abhishek S/o Ajay Kumar Jain, aged 28 years and an Executive-Nidish, son of Umesh Chand Jain, aged 28 years and a Sales Executive-Abhishek S/o Anand Jain, aged 29 years. ...
State vs.inderjeet Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI STATE Decided on:30. h July, 2018 CRL.L.P. 487/2018 Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Sultanpuri ........ Petitioner versus INDERJEET SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.28773/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Crl.M.A. No.28772/2018 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application delay of 7 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 487/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 3rd April, 2018 whereby the learned District & Sessions Judge acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 328 IPC, the State has preferred the present leave petition.2. Sequence of events leading to the prosecution case are that a call was received from Ct. Satish Kumar from SGM Hospital on 11th May, 2006 at about 2:20 P.M. about one lady being admitted i...
Satguru Education Society and Anr. Vs.delhi Development Authority and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
#57 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2018 W.P.(C) 7696/2018 & CM APPL.29486/2018 (Stay) SATGURU EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. O.P. Saxena and Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocates : Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India essentially seeks the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order bearing No.F.19(93) 97/IL/1047 dated 16.07.2018, whereby the respondent No.1/DDA had directed the petitioner school to hand over W.P.(C) 7696/2018 Page 1 of 6 possession of the land bearing No.A-2, DDA, MIG Flats, Lawrence Road, Keshavpuram, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land), where the latter is runni...
Raj Kumar @ Raja vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : July 30, 2018 CRL.A. 255/2015 PANKAJ SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Mirza Hasan Beg and Mr.Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 270/2015 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Choudhary, Ms.Puja Shrivastava and Mr.Anil Choudhary, Advocates for appellant no.1. Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for appellant no.2. versus Crl.A.255,270,302,312,329,418of2015 Page 1of 75 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 302/2015 A...
Yash Rajput vs.the State (govt.of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 229/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2018 YASH RAJPUT ........ Petitioner THE STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. SI Vijay Singh, PS Prashant Vihar. JUDGMENT3007.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.717/2017 under Sections 186/353/332/2IPC and Section 185 Motor Vehicles Act, Police Station Prashant Vihar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant, who is a constable in the Delhi Police, was on night patrolling duty. He found a car being driven in a rash and negligent manner. He tried to stopped the vehicle, however, the driver did not stop. The vehicle was chased and thereafter was stopped after about 100-150 meters. It is alleged BAIL APPLN. 229/2018 Page 1 of 3 that one ...
Central Bank of India vs.innovative Builders
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1000/2016 % CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA30h July, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh and Mr. S. Sankarana, Advocates. versus INNOVATIVE BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jaideep Singh and Mr. Sarthak Katiyal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant/bank/tenant against the impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated 16.7.2016 by which the trial court has decreed the suit so far as the relief of mesne profits is concerned for the period from 1.7.2011 to 21.6.2013 along with interest at 6% per annum simple. The amount decreed is Rs.6,11,975/- per month, and which is decreed on the basis of Lease RFA No.1000/2016 Page 1 of 6 Deed Ex.PW1/15, a Lease Deed executed by the appellant/defendant/tenant while ta...
Mohd Zubair vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~68 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2674/2017 MOHD ZUBAIR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana & Mr. Anirudh Ahuja, Advocates. versus CORAM: ..... Respondent GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Arun Birbal & Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in Khasra no.409, measuring 500 sq. yds. (10 biswas), situated in the revenue estate of village Jasola, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »