Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nisha vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of decision :31. t July, 2018 W.P.(C) 9008/2016 NISHA Through : Ms. Sija Nair Pal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Sukriti Ghai for Mr. Deves Singh, ASC(Civil)-GNCTD. Mr. Sushil Dutt (SO) in person Mr. A.P. Singh, Adv. R-5 & 6. for CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The additional affidavit dated 31st July, 2018 filed by the petitioner is taken on record.2. This writ petition has been filed in public interest seeking issuance of appropriate writ to the respondents to implement the Governments scheme to ensure timely disbursement of grant under the Janani Surakshya Yojana (JSY Scheme) during pregnancy or after child birth for the residents of the Chilla Khadar Jhuggi Camp, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I, New Delhi. Alongwith the affidavit, a list of several WP(C)No.9008/2016 Page 1 of 5 women...
Mohan Lal & Anr vs.sandeep Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4176/2015 and Crl. M.A. 14948/2015 MOHAN LAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohan Lal, Advocate versus SANDEEP AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Rajan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondent had filed a criminal complaint case (CC no.871/14) on 24.08.2006 impleading the petitioners as second and third prospective accused, in addition to their daughter Priyanka Agarwal as first prospective accused and one Sanjay Gupta as fourth prospective accused, alleging offences punishable under Sections 415, 420, 506, 120B, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). On the basis of the preliminary inquiry, in which the respondent examined himself as the sole witness (CW-1), the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 10.10.2011, issued process summoning the petitioners for offence under Section 417 / 34 IPC observing that no case for summoning of other two h...
Sunil Kumar & Anr vs.state (The Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : July 30, 2018 CRL.A. 255/2015 PANKAJ SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Mirza Hasan Beg and Mr.Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 270/2015 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Choudhary, Ms.Puja Shrivastava and Mr.Anil Choudhary, Advocates for appellant no.1. Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for appellant no.2. versus Crl.A.255,270,302,312,329,418of2015 Page 1of 75 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 302/2015 A...
Hawa Singh Saini vs.rajesh Kumar Jain (Hindu Undivided Family)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % HAWA SINGH SAINI RFA No.359/2017 30th July, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rekha Rustagi, Advocate. versus RAJESH KUMAR JAIN (HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILY) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Brij Bhushan Solanki, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 25.1.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant under Order XXXVII (3)(5) CPC and has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.10 lacs with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. RFA No.359/2017 Page 1 of 11 2. The case of the respondent/plaintiff was simple. Respondent/plaintiff has pleaded that it gave a loan of Rs.10 lacs to the appellant/defendant on 7.7.2012 and...
Ravi Sharma vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3756/2018 & Crl. M.A. 28820/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2018 RAVI SHARMA STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. P.N. Sharma & Mr. Tanuj Sharma, Advocate . For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar JUDGMENT3007.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.496 of 2016 under Sections 506/509/498A/3of the IPC read with Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Police Station Sultan Puri, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and reconciled their differences.... Petitioner No.1 and CRL.M.C. 3756/2018 Page 1 of 2 respondent No.2/complainant have started residing together amica...
Phoolwati & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 1543/2018 PHOOLWATI & ORS Date of Judgment:30. h July, 2018 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Shruti Munjal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, standing counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, adv. Mr.Arjun Mahajan, Mr.Arjun Pant and Mr.Suhail Buttan, Advts. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in Khasra nos.and 97/1, measuring 4553 sq. yds. situated in the revenue estate of village Karela, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, ...
Manoj Kumar & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : July 30, 2018 CRL.A. 255/2015 PANKAJ SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Mirza Hasan Beg and Mr.Vikas Walia, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 270/2015 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Choudhary, Ms.Puja Shrivastava and Mr.Anil Choudhary, Advocates for appellant no.1. Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for appellant no.2. versus Crl.A.255,270,302,312,329,418of2015 Page 1of 75 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal and Ms.Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Manish Tyagi, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr.S.S. Gandhi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gagan Minocha and Mr.Bhavook Chauhan, Advocates for the complainant. WITH + CRL.A. 302/2015 A...
Future Generali India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.ajay Kumar Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy, Advocate + MAC.APP. 979/2016 & CM436002016 + MAC.APP. 981/2016 & CM436722016 + MAC.APP. 982/2016 & CM437092016 + MAC.APP. 985/2016 & CM438782016 Versus UMESH CHAND JAIN & ORS RASHMIKA JAIN & ORS SWATI JAIN & ORS AJAY KUMAR JAIN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh and Mr. Rakesh Satija, Advocates for respondents-Claimants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 24th September, 2016 rendered by Motor 1. Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) grants compensation to respondents-Claimants on account of death of a businessman-Ashish S/o Rajender Kumar Jain, aged 34 years; a Senior Finance Officer-Abhishek S/o Ajay Kumar Jain, aged 28 years and an Executive-Nidish, son of Umesh Chand Jain, aged 28 years and a Sales Executive-Abhishek S/o Anand Jain, aged 29 years. ...
Omkar Singh Bhandari vs.dhanna Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
+ % OMKAR SINGH BHANDARI Through: versus 30th July, 2018 Mr. B.S.Chauhan, Advocate. ..... Appellant * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.922/2016 & CM No.43994/2016 DHANNA DEVI Through: Mr. Rajat Sachdev, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 15.2.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit without trial and at the stage of pleadings. Trial court has dismissed the suit by holding that if the appellant/plaintiff purchased from the seller-Rubina Rais the suit property, but since Ms. Rubina Rais did not purchase the suit property from the earlier owners, therefore, the appellant/plaintiff would not be the owner of the suit property i.e the top floor above the second floor RFA No.922/2016 Page 1 of 5 be...
Shri Ram Grocery vs.mitra Hospital Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~CA-35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:30. 07.2018 + CO.PET. 685/2016 SHRI RAM GROCERY versus MITRA HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED Through ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Kumar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mahesh Mr.Debashis Mukherjee, Ms.Simran Soni, Mr.Naveen Hegde and Ms.Aishwarya, Advs. for respondent. Mr.Sangram Patnaik and Ms.Rukmani Mukherjee, Advs. for applicant in CA15822017. Ms.Isha Khanna, Adv. for the OL. Mr.A.K.Singh, Adv. for Bank of Baroda. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CA15822017 & CA No.348/2018 1. CA15822017 is filed on behalf of the Ex.Directors of the respondent seeking de-sealing of the premises at Khasra No.306-M, 307-M and 312 situated at Village Morna, Near Metro Pillar No.199, Main Road Morna, Near Sector-35, Noida, U.P.2. CA3482018 is filed on behalf of the applicant Kamal Sports Pvt. Ltd. for directions to the respondent company in liquidation or Triage Healthcare (India) Private Lim...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »