Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anoop Kumar vs.sneha Uppal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~49 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:31. t July, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 179/2018 ANOOP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through Ms. Sarika Jetley Kocher, Advocate CORAM: SNEHA UPPAL versus Through Ms. Barnali Basak, Advocate ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL30338/2018 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM.APPL30337/2018(delay) 3. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 180 days delay in filing the present appeal. Counsel for the appellant submits that the delay in filing the appeal was for cogent, bona fide reasons and not on account of any inaction or carelessness.4. We have heard the counsel for the appellant and examined the application seeking condonation of delay. Since the application comprises of only a few paragraphs, we deem it appropriate to reproduce the same: MAT.APP(FC).179...
Asian Indigenous and Tribal Peoples vs.south Asia Human Rights Documen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:31. t July, 2018 + CS(COMM) 96/2018, IA No.4926/2009, 8383/2013 + ASIAN INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES Through Mr.Nitesh ..... Plaintiff Singh, Kumar Ms.Savita and Ms.Neha, Advs. SOUTH ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS DOCUMENTATION versus ..... Defendant CS(COMM) 133/2018, Crl.M.A.1389/2017, IA No.10889/2006, 13353/2013, 6285/2014, 891/2017, 8791/2017 Through Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv. SOUTH ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS DOC.TRUST & OTHE ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv. SUHAS CHAKMA AND OTHERS versus Through Mr.Nitesh Kumar ..... Defendant Singh, Ms.Savita and Ms.Neha, Advs. for D-1 & 4 Mr.Raju, Adv. for D-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.1657/2017 in CS(COMM) 96/2018 CS(COMM) No.96/2018 and CS (COMM.) 133/2018 Page 1 of 7 1. This application is filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. The plaintiff instituted this suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infring...
Neeraj Chauhan vs.smt. Arti Chauhan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2018 + CRL. REV.P. 832/2017 & CRL.M.A.18050/2017 NEERAJ CHAUHAN versus SMT ARTI CHAUHAN & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Mehta, Advocate For the Respondent: Respondent No.1 in person ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 13.09.2107 whereby the Trial Court has directed that an ad hoc payment of Rs.1 lac be paid to the respondent pending the consideration of the application for grant of interim maintenance.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the Trial Court has erred in not noticing that the income of the petitioner is only about Rs. 4,000/- to 5,000/- per month. He further submits that the petitioner is willing to pay the share for the children into their bank account but is not willing to pay anything to the wife respo...
Nawal Kishore Yadav vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~56 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA3392018 Date of decision:31. t July, 2018. NAWAL KISHORE YADAV ... Appellant UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Bibhash Kumar, Advocate for UOI/R-1 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CM. No.30401/2018 Learned counsels for the parties state that they would like to argue the appeal itself on merits. We take the statement on record and we have taken up the appeal for hearing. LPA3392018 1.2. The appellant is an inspector in Border Security Force. The appellant, on being posted with the National Security Guard Headquarters at Palam, New Delhi, was allotted General Pool Residential Accomodation House No.C-105, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi, vide allotment letter dated 31st December 2014.3. Subsequently, on 6th May, 2015, the appellant was transferred and posted to Security Headquarter...
Neetu Verma vs.state of n.c.t. Of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3778/2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2018 NEETU VERMA ........ Petitioner STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. C.M. Verma, Adv. along with petitioner in person. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Ali Haider Respondent No.2 in person. JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28696/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3778/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.111 of 2018 under Sections 308 of the IPC registered at Police Station Jagatpuri, Delhi, CRL.M.C. 3778/2018 Page 1 of 3 based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel which took place between the parties. The respondent No.2/complainant is father-in-law of the petitioner.3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the par...
M/S Natconn Engineering Private Limited vs.prabhjeet Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 31, 2018 + CONT.CAS(C) 928/2015 M/S NATCONN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED + versus PRABHJEET SINGH & ORS FAO(OS) 526/2015 M/S JITF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE LTD versus M/S NATCONN ENGINEERING PVT LTD (NEPT) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Vijaya Singh, Advocates in Item 5 Counsel for the respondent: Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. V.K.Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.2 State of MP. Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Vijaya Singh, Advocates in Item 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellants grievance is with respect to the order of the learned Single Judge under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Cont. Cas (C) No.928/2015 & FAO (OS) No.526/2015 Page 1 of 4 Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as Arbitration Act), thereby, dir...
Ajit Singh & Ors. Vs.pushpa Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"31st July, 2018 CRL. M.C. 2754/2016 AJIT SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra & Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advs. versus PUSHPA RANI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. J.K. Singh, Ms. Madhulika Agarwal & Mr. Harsh Pandit, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint of the respondent (CC No.34/2006), the petitioners were summoned to face trial for allegations constituting offences punishable under Sections 406/452/323/504/506/147 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) by the Metropolitan Magistrate. Since the criminal complaint arose out of the private complaint case, pre- charge evidence was adduced. Upon consideration of the said pre- charge evidence, the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 11.12.2015, found sufficient grounds to frame charges for offences under Sections 323/406/451/506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC against the petitioners. The magistrate, however, did not find...
Ram Niwas & Anr vs.estate Officer & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 7944/2018, CM No.30485/2018 (for interim directions), CM No.30486/2018, CM No.30487/2018 & CM No.30488/2018 (all for exemption) Date of decision:31. t July, 2018 RAM NIWAS & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Adv. versus ESTATE OFFICER & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi with Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Rizwan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India: (i) 1. seeks a declaration that the eviction of the petitioners from house at G- 18/A, Shiv Mandir, Nizamuddin West, Delhi 110 013 is illegal; and, (ii) seeks a direction to the respondents to restore the possession of the petitioners and of the aforesaid property; and, (iii) impugns the order dated 27th December, 2010 of the respondent no.1 in exercise of powers under Section 5(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act), of ...
Nisha Kapoor & Ors vs.new India Assurance Co Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 772/2015 & C.Ms. 22910/2015, 13773/2017 & 24431/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Appellant + MAC.APP. 919/2015 NISHA KAPOOR & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate .....Appellants NISHA KAPOOR & ORS + MAC.APP. 36/2016 & C.M. 1499/2016 Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ..... Respondent THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Appellant Versus NIKHIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate MAC.APP.772/2015 MAC.APP. 919/2015 MAC.APP. 36/2016 Page 1 of 8 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned first two appeals arise out of impugned Award of 31st July, 2015, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded comp...
Dharmender vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 58/2003 DHARMENDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT3107.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal directed against the judgment dated 16th January 2003 passed by the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in SC No.101/2002 arising out of FIR No.74/2000 registered at PS Mandawali convicting the Appellant for the offence under Sections 302 and 394 IPC both read with Section 34 IPC. Also challenged is the order on sentence dated 17th January 2003 whereby, for the offence under Section 3IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and for the offence under Section 3I...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »