Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Kenzo Sa vs.m/s Smart Collection & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-2018
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :25th July, 2018 M/S KENZO SA CS (COMM) 221/2018 & I.A. 13387/2014 Through: Mr. S. K. Bansal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar & Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri, Advocates (M-9810438450). ..... Plaintiff versus M/S SMART COLLECTION & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. H. P. Singh, Advocate for D-1 to 6&8 (M-9810008116). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(ORAL) 1. The Plaintiff M/s Kenzo S.A. (hereinafter, Plaintiff), is a French luxury house founded in 1970 by Japanese designer Kenzo Takada. In 1988, the Plaintiff ventured into fragrances, perfumery and other cosmetics worldwide. Ever since its establishment, the Plaintiff has been using the mark KENZO. The Plaintiffs products are said to have achieved global repute and renown and are claimed to have been sold in more than 100 countries. In India, the Plaintiffs mark KENZO is registered in several classes including classes 3, and 25, as stated in paragraph 6 of the plaint. It i...
N & N Chopra Consltants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner, Goods & S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, 2018 + SERTA202018, C.M. APPL. No.29038-29039/2018 N & N CHOPRA CONSLTANTS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Karan Sachdev, Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advocates ..... Appellant versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, GOODS & SERVICE TAX &CENTRAL EXCISE,DELHI EAST Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Senior Standing ..... Respondent Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) The question which the assessee urges in this appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as made by virtue of Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, is that the multiple penalties imposed in the circumstances of the case were excessive. The assessee is engaged in providing commercial coaching and training services and therefore, he is subject to service tax levy under the Finance Act, 1994. It was registered as a service tax assessee and it appears to have not paid up his lia...
Sanjay & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct) of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2018 CRL.M.C. 2714/2018 SANJAY & ORS THE STATE ( NCT) OF DELHI& ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Ms. Shanu Raina with Mr. Devesh Kumar, Advs. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2407.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 9638/2018(Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 9639/2018 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 21 days in refiling is condoned. Application is allowed. CRL.M.C. 2714/2018 & CRL.M.A.9637/2018 CRL.M.C. 2714/2018 Page 1 of 3 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.787 of 2006 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC, Police Station Jahangir Puri, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR emanates out of a matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1...
Indian Railway Welfare Organisation vs.creative Consortium
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h July, 2018 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 5/2018 & IA7472018 INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.A.K.Tewari, Mr.Vikramaditya Singh, Advs. versus CREATIVE CONSORTIUM ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Gurkamal Hora Arora, Ms.S.Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 15 read with Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking a declaration that the Arbitrator appointed by the Haryana Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council vide letter dated 16.08.2017 is de jure unable to perform his functions and for appointment of the Arbitral Tribunal in terms of the Arbitration Agreement between the parties contained in the Agreement dated 30th April, 2008 executed between the parties. By way of the said Agreement, the petitioner had appointed the respo...
Brijesh Kumar Maurya vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h July, 2018 CRL.L.P. 651/2016 BRIJESH KUMAR MAURYA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ramlal, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with SI Omveer Singh, PS Nand Nagri. Mr. I.A. Khan, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Receipt of cost paid by the petitioner has been handed over, which is taken on record.2.... Petitioner filed a complaint case against the respondent No.2 Jogeshwari Devi and Anr. bearing CC No.178/03/2013 under Sections 420/468/471/474/3IPC. Vide the impugned judgment dated 4th July, 2016, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate convicted Jogeshwari Devi for offences punishable under Sections 417/471/468 IPC and vide order on Sentence dated 27th August, 2016 awarded sentence of simple imprisonment for two years for offences punishable under Sections 468 and 471 IP...
G & G Enterprises vs.commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CUSAA1582018, C.M. APPL. No.29043/2018 Date of decision : July 24, 2018 G & G ENTERPRISES Through: Mr. Rajesh Rawal, Advocate ..... Appellant versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) Heard. Issue Notice. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice of the appeal. The appellants grievance is that copy of the order in original dated 25.06.2004 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) was never received by him when he approached the CESTAT in appeal; his belated appeal was rejected on the ground that CUSAA1582018 Page 1 of 3 the reasons adduced for seeking condonation of delay were unsubstantial. The record indicates that the appellant was apprised of the order but was given a copy of it for the first time in ...
Indrawati & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3930/2014 & Crl.M.A.13460/2014 Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2018 INDRAWATI & ANR. versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Prithvi Singh, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Manish Kumar, P.S.Vasant Kunj North. Mr.Sachin Pahwa, Adv. with respondent No.2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2407.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 30.06.2012 whereby charge has been framed against the petitioners under Sections 498A/34 of the IPC.... Petitioners further impugn order dated 24.05.2014 whereby the Trial Court has dismissed the application of the petitioners to summon the records from the Crime Against Women Cell and for supply of copies thereof to the petitioners. CRL.M.C. 3930/2014 Page 1 of 4 2. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a complaint given by r...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd vs.pappu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 24, 2018 (i) + MAC.APP. 946/2016 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD PAPPU & ORS. Through: Mr. M.P. Sahi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate for respondents-Claimants (ii) + MAC.APP. 948/2016 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. PAPPU & ORS. Through: Mr. M.P.Sahi, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate for respondent-Injured (iii) + MAC.APP. 949/2016 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.P.Sahi, Advocate MAC.APP. 946/2016 MAC.APP.948/2016 MAC.APP. 949/2016 MAC.APP. 950/2016 Page 1 of 12 PAPPU & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate for respondent-Injured (iv) + MAC.APP...
Vijay Kushwaha vs.chanchal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on :24. h July, 2018 + MAT APP (FC) 165/2018 VIJAY KUSHWAHA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kunal Manav, Advocate. Versus CHANCHAL Through: None. .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.(Oral) CM APPLN. No.28781/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM APPLN. No.28780/2018 (95 days delay) This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for seeking condonation of 95 days delay in filing the present appeal. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 95 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. MAT APPL. (FC) 165/2018 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 assailing the orders dated 25.01.2018 and 10.05.2018 passed by the Judge, Family MAT APPEAL ...
Yusuf Ali vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 07.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 762/2018 YUSUF ALI versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kinger with Ms. Roopa Nagpal, Advocates. For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. JUDGMENT2407.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.2/2018 under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Krishna Nagar.2. As per the allegations in the FIR, the prosecutrix was known to the petitioner for the last 2-3 years and he used to visit her house and had promised to marry her. It is alleged that sometime in March, 2016 the petitioner came to the house of the prosecutrix and gave her a cold drink to drink and she became unconscious after consuming the same. It is alleged that in that state, he made physical relation with her. The petitioner is alle...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »