Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Dheeraj Sharma vs.sonia Sharma @ Dimpy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2018 CRL.REV.P. 637/2018 DHEERAJ SHARMA SONIA SHARMA @ DIMPY versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Ms. Rashmi Jain, Adv. : None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A.28891/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.REV.P. 637/2018 & CRL.M.A.28890/2018 (stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 25.05.2018 whereby an ad- interim maintenance of Rs. 8000/- per month has been fixed for the respondent. The petitioner is further aggrieved by the disposal of the application directing the respondent to produce her documents. Perusal of the order dated 25.05.2018 shows that the petitioner Page 1 of 3 2. CRL.REV.P. 637-2018 admittedly has a monthly income of Rs. 23,700/-. It is in, these circumstances, trial court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 8000/-...
Raj Prakash Nayyar vs.om Parkash Nayyar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos. 600/2018 & 606/2018 + % 1. RAJ PRAKASH NAYYAR RFA No.600/2018 31st July, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S.Saini, Advocate. versus OM PARKASH NAYYAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Mahajan and Ms. Meena Mahajan, Advocates. RFA No.606/2018 2. RAJ PRAKASH NAYYAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S.Saini, Advocate. versus OM PARKASH NAYYAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Mahajan and Ms. Meena Mahajan, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.600/2018 & conn. Page 1 of 15 Caveat No.681/2018 in RFA6002018 Counsel appears for the caveator. Caveat accordingly stands discharged. CM No.2999/2018 (Exemption) in RFA6002018 CM No.30347/2018 (Exemption) in RFA6062018 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. CMs stand disposed of. RFA No.600/2018 & CM No.29990/2018 (stay) RFA No.606/2018 & CM No.30346/2018 (stay) 1. These two appeals filed under section 9...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.nisha Kapoor & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 31, 2018 + MAC.APP. 772/2015 & C.Ms. 22910/2015, 13773/2017 & 24431/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Appellant + MAC.APP. 919/2015 NISHA KAPOOR & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate .....Appellants NISHA KAPOOR & ORS + MAC.APP. 36/2016 & C.M. 1499/2016 Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate ..... Respondent THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate .....Appellant Versus NIKHIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate MAC.APP.772/2015 MAC.APP. 919/2015 MAC.APP. 36/2016 Page 1 of 8 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned first two appeals arise out of impugned Award of 31st July, 2015, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded comp...
Anita vs.department of Women and Child Development and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~3 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1743/2017 % ANITA Date of decision :31. t July, 2018 Through : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Abhinav Goyal and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. with Mr. Deepak, Co- ordinator, WCD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition relates to the working and implementation of a beneficial scheme notified by the Department of Women and Child Development, Government of India for the benefit of pregnant women.2. Our attention has been drawn to Section 4 of the National Food Security Act, 2013, which reads as follows :-"4. Nutritional support to pregnant women and lactating mothers - Subject to such schemes as may be framed by the Central Government, every pregnant woman and lactating WP(C)No.1743/2017 Pag...
Vijay Kumar Jha & Ors vs.shailender Kumar Jha & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:31. t July, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 178/2018 VIJAY KUMAR JHA & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocates versus CORAM: SHAILENDER KUMAR JHA & ANR Through Nemo ........ RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL303352018(Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM.APPL30336/2018(delay) 3. This is an application filed by the appellants seeking condonation of 22 days delay in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 22 days in filing the appeal is condoned.4. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP(FC).178/2018 Page 1 of 5 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 178/2018 5. This is an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act. The appellants have impugned the order dated 19.05.2018 passed by the Family Court declining the interim ...
Sanjay Bhandari vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:22. d March, 2018 Judgment pronounced on:31. t July, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 223/2018 SANJAY BHANDARI versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Manu Sharma, Mr Kabir Srivastava, Mr Adit Pujari, Mr Avneesh Arputham and Mr Abhir Datt, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State. Insp Prem Chandra, Crime Branch. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner impugns order dated 08.01.2018 to the limited extent, the Trial court has declared the petitioner as a proclaimed offender.2. The fulcrum of the challenge to the said order is based on the premise that the petitioner has not been accused of any of the offences mentioned in Section 82(4) of the Criminal procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) and, thus, it is contended tha...
Tina Sharma (Minor) Thorugh Her Father Bhagwati Prasad Sharma vs.union ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~58 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7820/2018 TINA SHARMA (MINOR) THORUGH HER FATHER BHAGWATI PRASAD SHARMA ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Jeetender Gupta, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Gurpreet Hora & Mr. Ashutosh Ghoole, Advocates for R-1 Mr. T Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biakthansangi Das, Mr. Tarun Verma, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty & Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocates for R-3 Mr. Amit Bansal with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL % CM No.29951/2018 ORDER3107.2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. WP(C) No.7820/2018 Issue notice. Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. T. Singhdev and Ms. Seema Dolo, respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4 Advocates accept notices on behalf of respectively and seeks time to file reply. Let reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks, thereafter. List on 14th November, 2018. CM No.29952/2018 Issue notice. Havin...
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd vs.renu Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 31, 2018 * + MAC.APP. 993/2017 & CM411942017 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus RENU SHARMA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates + MAC.APP. 1093/2017 RENU SHARMA & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates versus ANGREJ SINGH & ANR (SHRIRAM GENERAL INS CO LTD) .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The above-captioned two appeals are directed against impugned Award of 26th August, 2017 vide which Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- 01, South East District/Saket Court Complex, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `18,25,600/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Claimants on account of death of one Junior Engineer-Sanjay Kumar aged about 50 years and 5 months in a vehicular a...
Daya Kishan vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:31. July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7520/2017 & C.M. No.31007/2017 DAYA KISHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Anil Kumar, Adv versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain, Adv for LAC/L&B CORAM: Mr Pawan Mathur, Adv for DDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.31/33, total measuring 1 Bigha, situated in the revenue estate of village Tikri Kalan, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2013 Act') as neither the actual physical possession of t...
Anand Kumar Mahajan & Anr vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~23 & 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2/2016 & CRL.M.A. 14/2016 PRAVEEN KUMAR GOEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.P. Singh, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shiv Upadhyaya, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 1197/2016 & CRL.M.A. 5133/2016 ANAND KUMAR MAHAJAN & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Rattan, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.C. nos.2/2016 & 1197/2016 Page 1 of 9 1. On the basis of supplementary report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr. PC) in the wake of investigation into First Information Report (FIR) no.3of police station Dwarka involving offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120B, 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the petitioners stand summoned as accused by order dated 02.07....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »