Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Virender Pandey vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 43/2018 Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2018 VIRENDER PANDEY versus ........ Petitioner STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Mr.Ankur Gupta, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Nitu Kumar, P.S.Geeta Colony. JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.467/2017 under Sections 419/468/471/120B/34 of the IPC at Police Station Geeta Colony.2. Allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that the petitioner is alleged to have told the complainant, subsequent to a raid by BSES officials that he would be in a position to have the matter settled with the BSES team. Thereafter the complainant is allegedly been approached by one Pankaj Dhawan who is alleged to have called up the petitioner over phone and made the petitioner speak to the com...
Rahul & Anr. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3680/2018 Judgment delivered on:26. 07.2018 RAHUL & ANR THE STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Himanshu Buttan, Adv. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Kamlesh Kumar Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Adv. for complainant /R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.253 of 2008 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have 2. CRL.M.C. 3680/2018 Page 1 of 3 settled their disputes and have amicably dissolved their marriage by mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 04.05.2018 has been passed.3. It is further submitted on behalf ...
Little Millennium Education Pvt Ltd vs.monica Lalchand Vaswani & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$-24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h July, 2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 272/2018 LITTLE MILLENNIUM EDUCATION PVT LTD Through: Ms.Amrita Singh & Ms.Bhavna Gandhi, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus MONICA LALCHAND VASWANI & ANR. Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) ........ RESPONDENTS 1. This petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) inter alia making the following prayers:-"a) b) the their and officials etc.... RESPONDENTS employees, agents, restrain representatives, from representing, in any manner whatsoever, to the world at large, that the... RESPONDENTS are franchisee of the... Petitioner or are in any manner associated with the... Petitioner; restrain the... RESPONDENTS from using the brand name, trademarks, logos, designs, copyright materials including Know-How manuals, training resources, teaching aids and materials, curriculum boo...
Rajat @ Ajay Kumar & Ors. Vs.state (govt.of Nct Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~69 & 74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3604/2018 Judgment delivered on:.26.07.2018 RAJAT @ AJAY KUMAR & ORS versus STATE (GOVT.OF NCT DELHI)& ORS. + CRL.M.C. 3676/2018 SUNNY & ORS versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)& ORS. ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : Mr.Deepak Kaushik, Adv. Crl.M.C.3604/2018 Mr.Harish Kumar, Adv. Crl.M.C.3676/2018. for petitioners in for petitioners in For the Respondent(s): Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Omkar in Crl.M.C.3604/2018 and SI Ramakant, P.S.Sarai Rohilla in Crl.M.C.3676/2018. P.S.Sarai Rohilla Singh, CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL)... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 3604/2018 seek quashing of FIR1 CRL.M.C. 3604/2018 & 3676/2018 Page 1 of 3 No.402/2017 under Sections 3at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi and... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 3676/2018 s...
State vs.charan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h July, 2018 CRL.L.P. 471/2018 ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the versus Represented by: State with ASI Krishna, PS Mangol Puri. None. ..... Respondent * % + STATE CHARAN SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.28521/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.L.P. 471/2018 1. By this petition, the State seeks leave to appeal against the impugned judgment dated 31st March, 2018 acquitting the respondent for offences punishable under SectionsIPC.2. The prosecutrix in her complaint alleged that she was residing in a rented accommodation and her husband passed away four years ago. She had four sons. She knew one Anil Chaudhary working as a property dealer for the last 10-12 years. Earlier also Anil Chaudhary had sold her one house. Prosecutrix had another house in Sant Nagar, Burari which she wanted to dispose off thus she went to the property deale...
Lalit Singh vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~R-1A/1B. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 915/2002 + LALIT SINGH versus Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. ........ Petitioner THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP CRL.A. 517/2003 BALBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Sudha Reddy, versus Ms.Katyayini, Advocates. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % JUDGMENT2607.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 9th September 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions case No.69/1998 arising out of FIR No.210/1999 registered at Police Station (PS) Patel Nagar convicting both the Appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and additionally the Appellant Balbir Singh (Appellant in Crl.A.517/2003) of the offence under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC and the order o...
Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence vs.vinod Kumar Gupt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"26th July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1059/2016 and Crl. M.A. 4548/2016 DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CENTRAL EXCISE INTELLIGENCE Through: Mr. Satish Agarwala, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus VINOD KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain and Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % ORDER2607.2018 1. On the basis of some information followed by certain searches carried out by the officials of the petitioner in October 2015, a case of suspected violation of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was taken up for investigation. In the course of the said probe, certain persons connected with the companies involvement of which was suspected were called for inquiries. It is the case of the petitioner that material came to light that certain bogus firms were operating wherein certain accounts were being used in the name of dummy parties for fraudulent transactions leading to false claims of CENVAT credit being Crl. M...
dr.a.daili vs.jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :26. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8222/2003 % 1. DR.A.DAILI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.A.K.De, Mr.Rajesh Dwivedi and Ms.Ananya De, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner, who was working as a Technical Officer in the Jawahar Lal Nehru University (JNU) was issued a charge-sheet, on 2nd August, 2002, by the Gender Sensitisation Committee Against Sexual Harassment (hereinafter referred to as the Gender Sensitisation Committee) constituted in the JNU, based on a complaint, by Ms.Um Ean Kyo, alleging that the petitioner had sexually harassed her on 15th July, 2003. The communication from the Gender Sensitisation Committee to the petitioner opined, prima-facie, that the grievance of Ms. Kyo indicated that the petitioner had sexually harassed her and that, therefore, an Inquiry Committee, consisting of five persons (apparently in...
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10722/2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Ms Shreya Tyagi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for R- 1/UOI. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2607.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 17.10.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (hereafter the Commission) holding the petitioner liable to pay an amount of 26,20,727/- to Ms. Laxmi Kishore (respondent no.3). The Commission has further held that the liability of the petitioner with respect to electricity bill is restricted to 63,456/-.2. The aforesaid order was passed by the Commission pursuant to a complaint filed by respondent no.3 and one Sh Vijay Kishore , inter alia, W.P.(C) 10722/2016 Page 1 of 8 stating that they belong to the category of Scheduled Caste and ...
Avin Khandelwal & Anr vs.balbir Singh & Ors (United India Insurance Co ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~6 * % + MAC.APP. 659/2017 & CM No.10372/2018 Date of Decision:26. h July, 2018 AVIN KHANDELWAL & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Barun Kumar Sinha, Ms.Pratibha Sinha, Advocates versus BALBIR SINGH & ORS (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Anshum Jain and Mr. Shiv Bhalla, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.5,30,520/- has been awarded to the appellants.2. On 14th March, 2003 at about 11:55 P.M., Anshul Khandelwal was returning from Hyatt Regency Hotel after attending a birthday party of their friend in Baleno car bearing No.DL-9CB-1071 driven by Manas Bansal which collided with Ambassador car bearing No.DL-7CC-5301 at Prithvi Raj Road which resulted in death of Anshul Khandelwal and two occupants namely Manish Nigam and Anish Jain.3. The deceased, Anshul Khandelwal was survived by his parents who c...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »