Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yamin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~R-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + YAMIN CRL.A. 186/2003 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % JUDGEMENT2607.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27th February, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.88/2001 arising out of FIR No.172/2001 registered at Police Station (PS) Kalyan Puri convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302, 201 & 404 IPC and the order on sentence dated 28th February, 2003 whereby for the offence under SectionIPC he was sentenced to imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.5000, and in default of payment to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for six months. For the offence under Section 404 IPC, he was sentenced to the Crl. A. 186/2003 Page 1 of 16 period already undergone along with a fine of ...
Surender & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~70 & 73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3666/2018 Judgment delivered on:.26.07.2018 + AMAR YADAV & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. CRL.M.C. 3670/2018 SURENDER & ANR. versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ranjit Sharma, Adv Crl.M.C.3666/2018 & 3670/2018 for petitioners in For the Respondent(s): Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Naveen Kumar, P.S.Kapashera. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28517/2018(exemption) Crl. M.A. 28523/2018(exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3666/2018 & 3670/2018 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 3666/2018 & 3670/2018 1.... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 3666/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.187/2017 under Sections 341/354/5at Police Station Kapashera, New Delhi and... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 3670/2018 seek quashing of FI...
Rakesh Kumar vs.state (Gnctd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.563 /2018 & Crl. MB7972018 RAKESH KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Kumar and Mr Mohit versus Bhandari, Advocates. ....Respondent Through: Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE (GNCTD) CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2607.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 6th April, 2018 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in SC No.44549/2015 arising out of FIR No.89/2013 registered at Police Station (PS) Khajuri Khas convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 17th April, 2018 whereby he was sentenced to life imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.20,000/-; and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for two years.2. At the outset, it requires to be noticed that the Appellant (Accused No.1 A-1) and his mo...
Subhash Rathi vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4627/2017 SUBHASH RATHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh K. Burnwal, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra Nos. 258, 260, 262, 263, 266, 271, 288, 303, 468 and 469 situated in the revenue estate of Village Masoodpur, Tehsil Kapashera, New Delhi to the extent of respective share of the petitioner are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 ...
Rakesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~7 * + RAKESH STATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 125/2003 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Haneef Mohammad, Advocate. versus Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2607.2018 VINOD GOEL, J.:1. This is an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr PC) against the impugned judgment dated 27th January, 2003, passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, (ASJ), in Sessions Case No.55/1998 arising out of FIR No.1304/1997 at Police Station (PS) Janak Puri, Delhi registered under Section 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) convicting the appellant and the co-accused i.e. Sanjeev Sharma for the offences punishable under Section 3of the IPC for committing the murder of Lal Mohd. and the order of sentence dated 28th January, 2003. Crl.A. 125/2003 Page 1 of 29 2. The factual matrix of the case as taken note of by the Ld. ASJ in the opening paragraphs of the impugned judgmen...
Sunny & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~69 & 74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3604/2018 Judgment delivered on:.26.07.2018 RAJAT @ AJAY KUMAR & ORS versus STATE (GOVT.OF NCT DELHI)& ORS. + CRL.M.C. 3676/2018 SUNNY & ORS versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)& ORS. ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : Mr.Deepak Kaushik, Adv. Crl.M.C.3604/2018 Mr.Harish Kumar, Adv. Crl.M.C.3676/2018. for petitioners in for petitioners in For the Respondent(s): Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Omkar in Crl.M.C.3604/2018 and SI Ramakant, P.S.Sarai Rohilla in Crl.M.C.3676/2018. P.S.Sarai Rohilla Singh, CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2607.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL)... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 3604/2018 seek quashing of FIR1 CRL.M.C. 3604/2018 & 3676/2018 Page 1 of 3 No.402/2017 under Sections 3at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi and... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 3676/2018 s...
Balbir Singh vs.the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~R-1A/1B. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 915/2002 + LALIT SINGH versus Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. ........ Petitioner THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP CRL.A. 517/2003 BALBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Sudha Reddy, versus Ms.Katyayini, Advocates. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % JUDGMENT2607.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 9th September 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions case No.69/1998 arising out of FIR No.210/1999 registered at Police Station (PS) Patel Nagar convicting both the Appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and additionally the Appellant Balbir Singh (Appellant in Crl.A.517/2003) of the offence under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC and the order o...
Puran vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
$~R-13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PURAN STATE CRL.A. 211/2003 Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2607.2018 VINOD GOEL, J.:1. This is an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr PC) against the impugned judgment dated 31st January, 2003, passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, (ASJ), in Sessions Case No.128/1999 arising out of FIR No.591/1997 at Police Station (PS) Ashok Vihar, Delhi registered under Section 302/307/354/3Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the IPC for committing the murder of Jagpal with a knife and under Section 307 of the IPC for causing injuries to Bhagwati and Ravi. By the order of sentence dated 4th February, 2003 the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life and to pay a Cr...
Saddam vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SADDAM STATE Decided on:26. h July, 2018 CRL.A. 934/2017 Represented by: Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for State with ASI Jagpal Singh, PS Sonia Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Investigation was set into motion on receipt of information through PCR at 7.55 PM recorded vide DD No.25A (Ex.PW-2/A) informing Chauhan patti wali gali, ek ladke ko chaaku maar diya hai, jise le kar GTB jaa rhe hain. The DD entry was assigned to HC Ajeet and later to SI Yogesh (PW-17).2. FIR No.21/2013 under Section 326 IPC was registered on the complaint of Rashid (PW-1), the injured victim who stated that the appellant is his cousin and both of them have welding shops. On 28th January, 2013, he opened his shop and one gate was brought by one customer for repairing. On seeing this, his mausa-mausi (appellants parents), Kamil (appellants brother) and...
Sunita & Ors vs.rajan & Ors (Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~3 * % + MAC.APP. 96/2017 & C.M. Appl. 3175/2017 Date of Decision:26. h July, 2018 SUNITA & ORS Through: Mr. Siddhartha Nanwal, Advocate for ..... Appellants appellant. versus RAJAN & ORS (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,05,000/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. The accident dated 04th April, 2008 resulted in the death of Dalbir Singh. The deceased was aged 35 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, mother, two daughters, two sons and a younger brother who claimed compensation. The deceased was self-employed and was running a restaurant. It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.40,000/- per month. However, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »