Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Om Prakash Chautala vs.the Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 + CRL.M.C. 2646/2018 OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent versus ........ Petitioner Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Harsh K. Sharma with Ms. Viabhavi Sharma, Mr. Vivek Punia and Mr. Rohit Gaur, Advocates. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. for CBI with Mr. Philomon K., Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Damini K., Ms. Hansika Sahu, Advocates with SI Anil Kapoor. JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 03.05.2018, whereby, the application of the petitioner for summoning of the additional defence documents and witnesses has been declined.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecution took nearly seven years for concluding the prosecution evidence. He CRL.M.C. 2646/2018 Page 1 of 3 submits that the statement in defence of the petitio...
Anil Kumar Jain vs.shiam Cghs Limited. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~9. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.9709/2015 Date of decision:27. h July, 2018 ANIL KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Manhor Malik and Mr. Devashish, Advocates. versus SHIAM CGHS LIMITED. & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. D.K. Bhati and Ms. Rashmi Bhati, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Additional Standing Counsel, GNCTD for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): C.M.No.29406/2018 This is an application by the petitioner for restoration of the writ petition, which was dismissed in default and for non-prosecution vide order dated 19th March, 2018. It is stated that the law clerk of the counsel had inadvertently noted a wrong date of hearing. Reliance is placed upon photocopy of the court diary of the counsel, maintained by his clerk, as per which W.P. (C) No.9709/2015 Page 1 of 7 the next date of hearing was recorded as 19th July, 2018 instead of 19th March, 201...
Pankaj Sharma & Anr. Vs.state of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~2 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2754/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 + + PANKAJ SHARMA versus STATE OF NCT & ANR CRL.M.C. 2756/2018 PANKAJ SHARMA & ANR versus STATE OF NCT & ANR CRL.M.C. 2758/2018 PANKAJ SHARMA & ORS versus STATE OF NCT & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms.Mumtaz Ahmed, Adv for petitioners. Mr., Addl. PP for the State with Insp.Satinder Singh and SI Amit Dutt, P.S.Lajpat Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2707.2018 CRL.M.C. 2754/2018, 2756/2018 & 2758/2018 Page 1 of 4 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.9802 & 9803/2018 (Exemption) Crl. M.A. No.9810/2018 (Exemption) Crl. M.A. No.9812/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2754/2018, 2756/2018 & 2758/2018 1. The petitioner in Crl.M.C.2754/2018 seek ...
Bhom Singh and Anr vs.reliance General Insurance Company Ltd and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC. APP. 81/2018 Date of Decision: July 27, 2018 BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 82/2018 Advocates SUNITA DEVI AND ORS. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 83/2018 Advocates ISHWAR SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus MAC.APP.81-84/2018 MAC.APP. 87/2018 MAC.APP. 90/2018 Page 1 of 11 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 84/2018 Advocates BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 87/2018 Advocat...
Anjani Technopast Ltd & Ors. Vs.shubh Gautam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~02. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA (OS) 48/2018 Judgment dated 27th July, 2018 ANJANI TECHNOPAST LTD & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Sushil K. Tekriwal, Adv. CORAM: versus Through SHUBH GAUTAM ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI G.S. SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (hereinafter referred to as the Code) read with Section 10 of Delhi High Court Act, 1966, against the judgment dated 11.01.2018 passed by a Single Judge of this Court in CS (OS) No.66/2016.2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents had instituted a suit under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code for recovery of Rs.4,38,00,617/- along with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 24%, per annum. The suit was based on a loan agreement dated 24.2.2010 by which the appellants had borrowed Rs.2,50,00,000/- for a period of two months. Appellants ...
Union of India vs.m/s Zeman Techno Group
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 07.2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 74/2017 ZEMAN TECHNOGROUP ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Junaid Nahvi, Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Mr. Neeraj Choudhary, Mr. Niraj Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Tejaswitha, Advs., Ms. Nidhi Mohan& Mr. Vikram Verma, Deputy Director. + FAO(OS) (COMM) 30/2018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Tejaswitha, Advs., Ms. Nidhi Mohan& Mr. Vikram Verma, Deputy Director. versus M/S ZEMAN TECHNO GROUP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Junaid Nahvi, Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Mr. Neeraj Choudhary, Mr. Niraj Singh, Advs. FAO(OS) (COMM) 74/2017 & FAO(OS) (COMM) 30/2018 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. These two common appeals deal with the same subject matter i.e. the legality and vali...
Devki Devi & Ors vs.magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~22 & 46 * % + MAC.APP. 1120/2017 22 MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE Date of Decision:27. h July, 2018 CO LTD Through: Mr.Ved Vyas ..... Appellant Tripathi and Ms.Vidisha Kanoria, Advocates versus DEVKI DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Peeush Sharma and Mr. Bharvi Thakur, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 + MAC.APP. 328/2018 46 DEVKI DEVI & ORS Through: Mr.Peeush Sharma and Mr. Bharvi ..... Appellant Thakur, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 versus MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr.Ved Vyas ........ RESPONDENTS Tripathi and Ms.Vidisha Kanoria, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal MAC.APP. 1120/2017 & 328/2018 Page 1 of 4 whereby the compensation of Rs.10,41,000/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellant in MAC APP.1120/2017 is seeking reduction, whereas the appellants in MAC APP.328/2018 are seeking enhancement of compensation amount.2. The acciden...
Anoop Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~R-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 203/2003 ANOOP KUMAR versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. STATE. Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP with SI ........ RESPONDENTS G.N.Tiwari, P.S.Lahori Gate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % JUDGMENT2707.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal directed against the judgment dated 17th March 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.86/2001 arising out of FIR No.300/1992 registered at Police Station (PS) Lahori Gate convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 20th March 2003 sentencing him to imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in default of payment to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 1 year. The Appellant was also convicted for the offence under Section 201 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 3 years along with a fine of Rs.1,000/-, and in defau...
Brij Mohan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2609/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 BHUPENDER & ORS STATE & ANR + CRL.M.C. 2622/2018 BRIJ MOHAN & ORS versus versus STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : Ms. Padma Priya with Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Advocates with petitioners in person. For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State in CRL.M.C. 2609/2018 Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State in CRL.M.C. 2622/2018 SI Anurag Tyagi, PS Sarai Rohilla CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) The petitioners in Crl.M.C.2609/2018 seek quashing of FIR1 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 2609/2018 & CRL.M.C. 2622/2018 No.282/2013, under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Sarai Rohilla and the petitioners in Crl.M.C.2622/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.30/2013 under Sections 323/341/354/5IPC, PS Sarojini Nagar.2. 3. The subje...
Pankaj Sharma vs.state of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~2 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2754/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 + + PANKAJ SHARMA versus STATE OF NCT & ANR CRL.M.C. 2756/2018 PANKAJ SHARMA & ANR versus STATE OF NCT & ANR CRL.M.C. 2758/2018 PANKAJ SHARMA & ORS versus STATE OF NCT & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms.Mumtaz Ahmed, Adv for petitioners. Mr., Addl. PP for the State with Insp.Satinder Singh and SI Amit Dutt, P.S.Lajpat Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2707.2018 CRL.M.C. 2754/2018, 2756/2018 & 2758/2018 Page 1 of 4 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.9802 & 9803/2018 (Exemption) Crl. M.A. No.9810/2018 (Exemption) Crl. M.A. No.9812/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2754/2018, 2756/2018 & 2758/2018 1. The petitioner in Crl.M.C.2754/2018 seek ...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »