Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr vs.ashok Kumar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7784/2018 & C.M.Nos.29859/2018 (for stay) & 29860/2018(for exemption) GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Ruchira Gupta with Ms.Mona Sinha, Advs. versus ASHOK KUMAR GAUR & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Naresh Kaushik with Mr.Omung Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI ORDER2707.2018 The present petition has been filed by the Irrigation and Flood Control % 1. Department, GNCTD challenging the order dated 20.12.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing the O.A.No.3923/2014 filed by the respondent no.1 thereby quashing the order dated 06.03.2014 passed by the petitioner/Department rejecting the request of respondent no.1 for grant of retiral benefits on the ground that he had not submitted his technical resignation and nor was a copy of his relieving order issued at the time when he was absorbed in the Delhi Energy Dev...
Vidya Devi & Ors vs.reliance General Insurance Company Ltd and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC. APP. 81/2018 Date of Decision: July 27, 2018 BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 82/2018 Advocates SUNITA DEVI AND ORS. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 83/2018 Advocates ISHWAR SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus MAC.APP.81-84/2018 MAC.APP. 87/2018 MAC.APP. 90/2018 Page 1 of 11 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 84/2018 Advocates BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 87/2018 Advocat...
Pijush Kanti Roy and Ors. Vs.experion Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(COMM) 301/2017 Judgment pronounced on:27. 07.2018 PIJUSH KANTI ROY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Ms.Sushila Ram Verma Ms.Taruna Verma, Advocates and versus EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Pankaj Vivek, Mr.A.Tripathi and Ms.Bindya Rani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to impugn the award dated 29.04.2017 passed by the learned Arbitrator.2. The brief facts, which led to filing of the present petition, are that the petitioners jointly booked apartments being Flat Nos.502 and 702 in Tower - B in the Project HEARTSONG at Gurgaon. The total costs of each flat was Rs.1,30,32,933/-, respectively. On 25.12.2014 the petitioners requested the respondent to cancel the allotment of Flat Nos.502 and 702 as they were in financial difficulty. On 31...
Kalpana Balupuri Butta vs.pritendra Kumar Butta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h July, 2018 CS(OS) 108/2016, CC No.69/2016 & OA No.58/2018 KALPANA BALUPURI BUTTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sabharwal, Ms. Heena Ahluwalia, Mr. Sameer Bhatnagar, Ms. Pooja Chauhan, Advocates versus PRITENDRA KUMAR BUTTA Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr.Yakesh ..... Defendant Anand, Ms. Sonam Anand, Mr. Nimit Mathur, Mr.Varun K. Bala, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CS(OS) 108/2016 AND CC No.69/2016 1. The plaintiff instituted this suit for recovery of possession of basement and ground floor of property No.C-425, Defence Colony, New Delhi, pleading: (i) that the defendant is the brother of the husband of the plaintiff; (ii) that the property No.C-425, Defence Colony, New Delhi was purchased by the husband of the plaintiff vide registered Sale Deed dated 1st January, 1983 from one Shri V.K. Mehta, the earlier owner of the said property and the leasehold rights in the land underneath ...
Salauddin @ Nuroo vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 558/2018 & CRL. MB7842018 SALAUDDIN @ NUROO ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri, Delhi. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2707.2018 % Dr.S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by Salauddin, (Accused No.2: A-2 in the original proceedings) against the judgment dated 8th March, 2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Pilot Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.59429/2016 arising out of FIR No.407/2016 registered at Police Station (PS) Jahangirpuri, Delhi convicting him for the offence under Section 3IPC for committing the murder of Ashok on 21st July, 2016 at around 10:45 am near Kushal Cinema, G-H Block, Jahangirpuri, Delhi. Crl.A. 558/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. The appeal is also against the order on sentence dated 12th March, 2018 whereby the Appellant herei...
Bhupender & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2609/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 BHUPENDER & ORS STATE & ANR + CRL.M.C. 2622/2018 BRIJ MOHAN & ORS versus versus STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : Ms. Padma Priya with Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Advocates with petitioners in person. For the Respondent: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State in CRL.M.C. 2609/2018 Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State in CRL.M.C. 2622/2018 SI Anurag Tyagi, PS Sarai Rohilla CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) The petitioners in Crl.M.C.2609/2018 seek quashing of FIR1 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 2609/2018 & CRL.M.C. 2622/2018 No.282/2013, under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Sarai Rohilla and the petitioners in Crl.M.C.2622/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.30/2013 under Sections 323/341/354/5IPC, PS Sarojini Nagar.2. 3. The subje...
Cdr Brij Mohan Lal Khemchand Chhabra vs.state and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 506/2017 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 CDR BRIJ MOHAN LAL KHEMCHAND CHHABRA ........ Petitioner versus STATE AND OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. Mr. Shaildev Dahiya, Advocate for R-2 & 3 with R- 2 and 3 in person. % ORDER2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 506/2017 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1292/2017 (suspension of sentence) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 15.07.2017 of the Appellate Court, whereby, the appeal filed by the petitioner impugning the Order on Conviction dated 20.10.2016 and Order on Sentence dated 22.11.2016, passed by the Trial Court, has been dismissed.2. The petitioner was convicted for an offence under Section 138 of the CRL.REV.P. 506/2017 Page 1 of 3 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The complaint was fil...
Sunita Devi & Ors vs.reliance General Insurance Company Ltd and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC. APP. 81/2018 Date of Decision: July 27, 2018 BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 82/2018 Advocates SUNITA DEVI AND ORS. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 83/2018 Advocates ISHWAR SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus MAC.APP.81-84/2018 MAC.APP. 87/2018 MAC.APP. 90/2018 Page 1 of 11 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 84/2018 Advocates BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 87/2018 Advocat...
Sh. Shiv Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~03. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8949/2017 % Date of Judgment:27. h July, 2018 SH. SHIV KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Bhagwad Prasad, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Sharma, Adv. for respondent no.1. Mr.Padam Kant Saxena and Mr.Deepak R. Dahiya, Advs. for respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that all the acquisition proceedings, initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and resulting pursuant to the Award bearing No.14/2005-06/DC (N-W) of Village Pansali, Delhi, with respect to the land bearing Khasra no.6/13(1-00),(4-16) total land measuring 05 Bighas 16 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Pansali, Delhi, stands lapsed under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and R...
Meena Tyagi vs.rajinder Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h July, 2018 CRL.L.P. 476/2018 MEENA TYAGI ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Pawan Sharma, Advocate versus RAJINDER SHARMA ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.28591/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.L.P. 476/2018 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 10th May, 2018 acquitting the respondent for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2. Briefly, the case of the petitioner in his complaint was that the petitioner extended a friendly loan of 11.50 lakh to the respondent and in order to liquidate the liability, the respondent handed over a cheque bearing No.548947 dated 22nd October, 2010 for a sum of 11.50 lakh drawn on ICICI Bank, Sonepat Branch with the assurance that on presentation, it would be honoured. When the petitioner presented the said ch...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »