Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Roshan Lal vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~49 + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"27th July, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3685/2018 and Crl.M.A.28581/2018 ROSHAN LAL Through: Mr. Yatinder Lal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus with Mr. G.S. Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) prays for quashing of the proceedings arising out of First Information Report (FIR) No.358/2015, under Sections 354A/354D/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of Police Station Vivek Vihar, on the ground that the first informant (second respondent herein) has agreed to settle the dispute. Reliance is placed on Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012 (9) SCALE, 257, and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr., (2014) 6 SCC466 2. A perusal of the FIR which was lodged o...
Inderjeet Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : May 24th, 2018 Date of Decision : July 27, 2018 + CRL.A. 126/2018 SHEETAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Joginder Tuli with Mr. Ashu Kumar, Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State + CRL.A. 247/2018 AND INDERJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State, SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Alipur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Crl.A. 247 & 126 of 2018 Page 1 of 36 1. The present Criminal Appeals have been filed by the appellants- Sheetal (Crl.A. 126/2018) and Inderjeet Singh (Crl.A. Nos.247/2018 ) under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the common judgment of conviction dated 23.12.2017 and common order on sentence dated 29.01.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Cou...
Zahir Khan vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1599/2018 ZAHIR KHAN $~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent versus ........ Petitioner Mr.Abbas Khan, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for State. ASI Vijay Kumar, PS Seelampur JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No.16/2018 under Section 20 Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The interim bail is sought on the ground that the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner will be solemnized in Muzaffar Nagar, U.P.2. It is contended that the petitioners wife is a patient of tuberculosis and is presently undergoing treatment and there is no other male member in the family for making arrangements for marriage. The marriage is scheduled for 30.07.2018. BAIL APPLN. 1599/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. Lear...
Lt Col Ramandeep Singh vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3706/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 LT COL RAMANDEEP SINGH versus THE STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. ASI Krishan Kumar, PS Delhi Cantt. Mr. S.P. Nangia with Mr. R.C.S. Bhadoria, Advocate for R-2. JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.28640/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3706/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.70/2018, under CRL.M.C. 3706/2018 Page 1 of 3 Section 325 IPC, Police Station Delhi Cantt.2. The subject FIR emanates out of a quarrel which took place between the husband and the wife.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have resolved their disputes and the petitioner and the res...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.kamla Chauhan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 27, 2018 MAC.APP. 756/2015 & CM22102015 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus KAMLA CHAUHAN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.T.K. Mukherjee and Mr. M.S. Rawat, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 30th July, 2015 grants compensation of `13,07,090/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondents-Claimants on account of death of a driver-Prithvi Raj aged 53 years in a vehicular accident on 28th February, 2013.2. The factual background of this case, as noticed in the impugned Award, is as under:-"The facts, in brief, as mentioned in the petition are that on 28.02.2013 at about 04:35 am, while the deceased Prithvi Raj Chauhan S/o Late Sh. Padam Singh, was going to his office on his motorcycle make Passion Pro bearing registration No.DL-3SCB-8612, and when he reached near Aali More Red Light, Mathura Road, Ba...
Ramesh Chander Dabas & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:27. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9707/2015 RAMESH CHANDER DABAS & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Mr.Harpreet Singh, Mr.Pranjal Saran, Ms.Shaheen and Mr.M.C.Verma, Advts. ........ RESPONDENTS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, standing counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. Mr.Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra no.25//12 (04-04) and 25//19 (04-16), situated in the revenue estate of village Mubarakpur Dabas, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation...
Sanjay Bansal vs.kusum Lata Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~17 + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3497/2015 Decided on:-"27th July, 2018 SANJAY BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Adv. along with petitioner in person. versus KUSUM LATA JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P.K.Rawal, Advocate with Mr. Alok Pandey, & Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner claims to be a tenant in respect of one shop, measuring 6.80 x 2.60 meters, ground floor, forming part of property bearing No.1747-48, Gali Satyawati Lane, Bhagirath Palace, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006. An eviction petition in the name of the respondent describing her as the landlady had been filed in the court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC) against the petitioner, it having been registered as eviction case No.E-90/2014, the ground invoked being under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, i.e. non-payment of rent.2. The petitioner, upon being served wi...
Vineeta vs.pradeep Kumar & Ors (United India Insurance Company Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h July, 2018 $~28 * % + MAC.APP. 463/2018 VINEETA Through: Mr.A.K. Soni and Mr.Pavan Kumar ..... Appellant versus Vashishth, Advocates PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD) Through: Mr.Shoumik Majumdar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.3,96,314/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellant seeks enhancement of award amount.2. On 07th May, 2006, the appellant was going to Mata Sundri College as a pillion rider along with her friend, Shabnam on a motor cycle bearing No.DL-7S AK-4409, driven by Shahid Ahmed Kureshi. When the motor cycle reached I.T.O. Chowk, Shahid stopped the motor cycle on the red light. When the light turned green, Shahid started his motor cycle and was crossing I.T.O. Chowk when he was hit by the offending car which jumped the red light. Th...
M/S Felicia Realcon India Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Shri Colonizers and Developer ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:17. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h July, 2018 + CS(COMM) 344/2017 M/S FELICIA REALCON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Mukti Choudhary, Mr.Prateek, Advocates with Mr.Vivek Kalia AR in person. versus M/S SHRI COLONIZERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS .... Defendants Through: Mr.Raman Gandhi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.13877/2017 1. Before coming to the application under Order 37 Rule 3 (5) of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred as the CPC), let me state few facts of the case.2. Plaintiff has filed this suit under Order 37 CPC on the basis of three cheques of 1.00 Crore each against the defendants. The case pleaded by the plaintiff is as follows:-"a) The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Companies Act. The defendant No.1 is also a private limited company and the defendants No.2 to 5 are its directors; CS(COMM) No.344/2017 Page 1 of 8 b) the Plaintiff s...
Jatin Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 CRL.M.C. 3702/2018 JATIN KUMAR & ORS versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Shoueb Hasan with Mr. Jameel Ahmed, Advocates. Mr. Rajpal Kasana, Advocate. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. SI Prateek Saxena, PS Jaitpur. Mr. Shamsher Ali, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.657/2014 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Jaitpur.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 3702/2018 Page 1 of 3 3.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the parties have settled their disputes before the Counselling Cell, Family Court...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »