Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3705/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 SANDEEP ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. ASI Anita Dagar, PS Nafargarh. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate for R-2. JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.28637/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3705/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.27/2017 under Section 354D/506 IPC, Police Station Najafgarh. Chargesheet has already been filed. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner had Page 1 of 3 2. CRL.M.C. 3705/2018 approached the complainant contending that he had studied with her in a college and thereafter used to pester her with proposal of marriage.3. Learned counsel for the petitio...
Lt. Governor and Ors. Vs.shadilal Enterprises Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.105/2006 and C.M. Appl. No.2333/2006 (for stay) RFA No.59-62/2006 27th July, 2018 ..... Appellants + + % + LT. GOVERNOR AND ORS. RFA No.59-62/2006 Through: None. versus SHADILAL ENTERPRISES LTD. AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Advocate for R-4. AND + RFA No.105/2006 and C.M. Appl. No.2333/2006 (for stay) D.T.T.D.C. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Advocate. versus SHADILAL ENTERPRISES LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES RFA No.59-62/2006 Page 1 of 25 RFA No.105/2006 VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.59-62/2006 1. These Regular First Appeals No.59-62/2006 under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant nos. 1 to 3 in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 1.10.2005 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of moneys filed by the respon...
s.r. Mittal vs.syndicate Bank & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of pronouncement:27. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4926/2000 S.R. MITTAL Through: Mr. Robin George and Mohd. ........ Petitioner versus Zeeshan Ansari, Advs. SYNDICATE BANK & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 1. These proceedings emanate from a charge-sheet, dated 9th April, 1999, issued to the petitioner, by the respondent Bank. The said charge-sheet proposed to hold an inquiry, against the petitioner, under Regulation 6 of the Syndicate Bank Officers Employees (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations).2. The charge-sheet contained two articles of charge. These related to credit facilities extended, by the petitioner, to M/s Raja Forge and M/s Shyamji Industries, during the period when the petitioner was working as Sub-Manager at the Faridabad branch of the respondent- Bank. Certain irregulari...
Praneet Singh Davar vs.l S Davar & Co & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 122/2018, CAV.No.676/2018 & CM Nos.29753-54/2018 % Date of decision :27. h July, 2018 PRANEET SINGH DAVAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Akhshay Makhija, Adv. versus L S DAVAR & CO & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Maanav Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CAV.No.676/2018 The caveator is represented and has been heard. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.29754/2018 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. FAO(OS) 122/2018 1. By this appeal, the appellant has assailed the order dated 2nd July, 2018 whereby an interim order has been passed prohibiting the FAO(OS)No.122/2018 Page 1 of 3 appellant/defendant in CS(OS)No.307/2018 from representing himself of being a partner of the respondent no.1/plaintiff no.1 firm or to be in any way associated with the said firm (since h...
Meja Urja Nigam Pvt Ltd vs.ratna Infrastructure Projects Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:24. h JULY, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h JULY, 2018 + ARB. A. (COMM.) 5/2018, CCP(O) 35/2018 MEJA URJA NIGAM PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Aman Varma, Ms.Anshula Grover, Mr.Parth S.Chaudhari, Mr.Shukhankar and Ms.Suveni Bhagat, Advocates. versus RATNA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Kiran Suri, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Purvesh Buttan, Mr.Abhay N.Das, Mr.Fahad and Ms.Aishwarya Kumar, Advocates. Imtiaz CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The contract was awarded to the respondent on 18.05.2010. The period of contract was 36 months from the date of LOA and the value of the contract was `137,21,75,327/-. Since the respondent could complete only 63% of the work within the time period i.e. of the value of `85,17,29,655/- so on payment of `85.00 crores to the respondent, still the value of the work to the extent of `52,04,45,672/- was not complete and the work was...
Hardeep Singh Verma & Anr. Vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3686/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 HARDEEP SINGH VERMA & ANR. STATE OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Balwant R-2 Suchitra Tomar in person. JUDGMENT2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.76 of 2009 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station CWC Nanak Pura, New Delhi. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved by decree of divorce dated 27.04.2012. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into a CRL.M.C. 3686/2018 Page 1 of 2...
Dr Rahul Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~14. * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h July, 2018 LPA3552017 DR RAHUL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pradeep Kumar and Mr.Parveen versus K. Nagpal, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, and Mr.T.P. Singh, Adv. for respondents no.1 to 3. Mr.V.N. Koura and Mr.Paramjit Benipal, Advs. for respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal is directed against the order dated 10.11.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C)No.7804/2015 whereby the petition filed by the petitioner was rejected.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of the present appeal, are that an advertisement was published by respondent no.2 inviting applications from the eligible candidates for the post of Quality Control Officer (Grade-A), Boiler Operations Engineers, Medical Officer, Assistant Officer, Human Resource Officer...
Pankaj Sharma & Ors. Vs.state of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~2 to 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2754/2018 Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 + + PANKAJ SHARMA versus STATE OF NCT & ANR CRL.M.C. 2756/2018 PANKAJ SHARMA & ANR versus STATE OF NCT & ANR CRL.M.C. 2758/2018 PANKAJ SHARMA & ORS versus STATE OF NCT & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms.Mumtaz Ahmed, Adv for petitioners. Mr., Addl. PP for the State with Insp.Satinder Singh and SI Amit Dutt, P.S.Lajpat Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2707.2018 CRL.M.C. 2754/2018, 2756/2018 & 2758/2018 Page 1 of 4 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.9802 & 9803/2018 (Exemption) Crl. M.A. No.9810/2018 (Exemption) Crl. M.A. No.9812/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2754/2018, 2756/2018 & 2758/2018 1. The petitioner in Crl.M.C.2754/2018 seek ...
Ajit and Anr. Vs.reliance General Insurance Company Ltd and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + MAC. APP. 81/2018 Date of Decision: July 27, 2018 BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 82/2018 Advocates SUNITA DEVI AND ORS. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 83/2018 Advocates ISHWAR SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus MAC.APP.81-84/2018 MAC.APP. 87/2018 MAC.APP. 90/2018 Page 1 of 11 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 84/2018 Advocates BHOM SINGH AND ANR. Through: Mr. V.N.Jha, Advocate .....Appellants Versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K.Soni & Mr. Pavan Kumar, + MAC. APP. 87/2018 Advocat...
Sangeeta Agarwal vs.jawahar Lal Nehru Sports Trust
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h July, 2018 RSA1082018 SANGEETA AGARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.M. Bari and Ms. Shweta Bari, Advs. versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU SPORTS TRUST .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.29727/2018 (for exemption). Through: None.1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RSA1082018.3. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 27th February, 2018 in RCA No.of the Court of the Additional District Judge (West)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 20th December, 2016 in CS SCJ No.99of the Court of the Civil Judge-04 (West)]. of dismissal of suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.2,85,000/- along with interest from the respondent/defendant/Trust.4. The counsel for the appellant/plainti...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »