Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harak Singh Rawat & Ors. Vs.the New India Assurance Co Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 + MAC. APP. 254/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus HARAK SINGH RAWAT & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur and Mr. Parveen Dutt, Advocates + MAC. APP. 1182/2013 HARAK SINGH RAWAT & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur and Mr. Parveen Dutt, Advocates 1. Versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD AND ANR Through: Mr. Pankaj Singh Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 21st November, 2012 grants compensation of `3,56,100/- with interest @ 9% per annum to injured-Harak Singh, aged 39 years, on account of grievous injury suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 4th September, 2004.2. In the above captioned first appeal, Insurer pleads lack of negligence of driver of Insured vehicle i.e....
Somya Salwan vs.m/s Neesa Leisure Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.243/2017 + % SOMYA SALWAN30h July, 2018 Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant M/S NEESA LEISURE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Ms. Nutan Kumari, Mr. Ashwani Kumar and Mr. Rahul Kumar Jha, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the Trial Court dated 15.9.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff by holding that the trial court had no territorial jurisdiction. Trial court has held that jurisdiction will be of the courts at Gandhinagar in Gujarat because of existence of such a jurisdictional RFA2432017 Page 1 of 5 clause in the two subject purchase orders placed upon the appellant/plaintiff by the respondent/defendant.2. The facts of the case are that with respect...
Varun Mehlawat & Ors. Vs.piyoosh Gupta & Ors. (The National Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 598/2017 Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ..... Appellant VARUN MAHLAWAT & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira + MAC.APP. 601/2017 Arora, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus VARUN MAHLAWAT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira + MAC.APP. 651/2017 Arora, Advocates VARUN MEHLAWAT & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira Arora, Advocates Versus PIYOOSH GUPTA & ORS (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 598/2017 MAC.APP. 601/2017 MAC.APP. 651/2017 MAC.APP. 655/2017 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 655/2017 1. VARUN MEHLAWAT & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira Arora, Advocates Versus PIYOOSH GUPTA & ORS. (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate...
Jagtar Singh vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Batta, Ms.Neha, Advs. $-26 * JAGTAR SINGH + O.M.P. (COMM) 111/2016 versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel with Mr.Mayank Goel, Mr.Supreet Bindra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 23rd December, 2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to Agreement relating to Ordinary/Road Side/Car/Scooter/Bus/Tempo parking site at Court Market, Jama Masjid dated 5th January, 2011.2. The Arbitrator in the Impugned Award has allowed a remission of 50% of the licence fee payable by the petitioner to the respondent for the first and second year of the...
Venna Jain vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~54 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h July, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1516/2018 VENNA JAIN UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Ms.Shruti Munjal, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, standing counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for DDA.s CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in Khasra no.490, measuring 1 bigha 1 biswa situated in the revenue estate of village Madan Pur Khadar, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ...
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.varun Mahlawat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 598/2017 Date of Decision: July 30, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Versus Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ..... Appellant VARUN MAHLAWAT & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira + MAC.APP. 601/2017 Arora, Advocates NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus VARUN MAHLAWAT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira + MAC.APP. 651/2017 Arora, Advocates VARUN MEHLAWAT & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira Arora, Advocates Versus PIYOOSH GUPTA & ORS (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 598/2017 MAC.APP. 601/2017 MAC.APP. 651/2017 MAC.APP. 655/2017 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 655/2017 1. VARUN MEHLAWAT & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Ms. Ruchira Arora, Advocates Versus PIYOOSH GUPTA & ORS. (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate...
Suresh Chand Goyal vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~14 & 15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h July, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3002/2015 and Crl. MA107202015 SURESH CHAND GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocates versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing Counsel, Income Tax CRL.M.C. 3016/2015 and Crl. MA107412015 GOYAL GASES P.LTD. + + STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing Counsel, Income Tax CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. A prosecution launched by the second respondent in 1993 alleging offences punishable under Sections 276 C (1) and 277 of Income Tax Act, 1961 continues to hang fire on the file of the Crl.MC3002/2015 & 3016/2015 Page 1 of 4 Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) till date, the petitions at hand, besides others, also being t...
Ratan Sharma vs.eashwar Sri Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :13th July, 2018 Date of Decision:30. h July, 2018 RATAN SHARMA O.M.P. 447/2010 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyapal Singh, Advocate. (M:9811538496) EASHWAR SRI KUMAR & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yashpal Singh, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT CRL.M.A.13336/2012 in O.M.P. 447/2010 1. A petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, the Act) was filed by the... Petitioner- Sh. Ratan Sharma (hereinafter, Petitioner) seeking enforcement of the Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter MoU) dated 6th June, 2006. The said petition was filed by one Sh. Ramesh Choudhary claiming to be the authorized representative of the... Petitioner, vide GPA dated 25th March, 2010.2. As per the... Petitioner, vide MoU dated 6th June, 2006, the... RESPONDENTS had agreed to sell property bearing no.201 in Block B-2, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi to the...
Sheetal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : May 24th, 2018 Date of Decision : July 27, 2018 + CRL.A. 126/2018 SHEETAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Joginder Tuli with Mr. Ashu Kumar, Ms. Joshini Tuli and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for the State + CRL.A. 247/2018 AND INDERJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State, SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Alipur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT OF THE COURT Crl.A. 247 & 126 of 2018 Page 1 of 36 1. The present Criminal Appeals have been filed by the appellants- Sheetal (Crl.A. 126/2018) and Inderjeet Singh (Crl.A. Nos.247/2018 ) under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the common judgment of conviction dated 23.12.2017 and common order on sentence dated 29.01.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Cou...
Roshini vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 07.2018 % BAIL APPLN. 139/2018 ROSHINI STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sidharth Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Ram Dev : : % ORDER2707.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory Bail in case FIR No.558 of 2017 under Sections 328/3of the IPC Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi.2. The petitioner is the sister of the mother-in-law of the complainant. The mother in law has expired. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner alongwith the husband of the complainant had administered bed bug repellent to her consequent to a quarrel that took place on account of the complainant having switched off the CCTV camera installed at the house of the complainant. BAIL APPLN. 139/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned co...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »