Delhi Court July 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Bhushan Kapur vs.m/s. Neha Deep Construction
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.113/2006 % BHARAT BHUSHAN KAPUR31t July, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Puri, Advocate. versus M/S. NEHA DEEP CONSTRUCTION ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.113/2006 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 2629-30/2006 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court whereby the trial court has dismissed the suit for specific performance and injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff. Specific performance was claimed by the appellant/plaintiff with respect to two office spaces bearing nos. H-7 and H-8 having an approximate area of 225 sq. feet each situated in the building constructed on plot No.1, Rajendra Place, New Delhi, by RFA No.113/2006 Page 1 of 9 the respondent/defendant. Trial court has dismissed the suit a...
Surinder Kumar Aggarwal vs.moti Gupta Jagdish Kumar Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t July, 2018 + EX.P. 336/2014, EX.APPL.(OS) 696/2014, EX.APPL.(OS) 964/2014, EX.APPL.(OS) 407/2016, EX.APPL.(OS) 228/2018 & 299/2018 SURINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL Through: Mr. S. K. Rameezuddin (M:9899347995) ..... Decree Holder Singh and Mr. Reja, Advocates. MOTI GUPTA JAGDISH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. versus ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Alok Sinha, Advocate for JD No.1 & 2. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. This is an execution petition seeking to execute the judgment and decree dated 15th December, 2013 passed by the Commercial Plenary Court in Dubai. The case of the decree holder who was the Plaintiff in the said Court is that the Plaintiff lent a sum of AED1500,000/- (AED one million and five hundred thousand) to the Defendant No.2. In acknowledgment of the said loan, Defendant No.2 had executed an acknowledgment and she had also handed over a ch...
Renu Sharma & Ors vs.angrej Singh & Anr (Shriram General Ins Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 31, 2018 * + MAC.APP. 993/2017 & CM411942017 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus RENU SHARMA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates + MAC.APP. 1093/2017 RENU SHARMA & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Varun Sarin and Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates versus ANGREJ SINGH & ANR (SHRIRAM GENERAL INS CO LTD) .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The above-captioned two appeals are directed against impugned Award of 26th August, 2017 vide which Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- 01, South East District/Saket Court Complex, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `18,25,600/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Claimants on account of death of one Junior Engineer-Sanjay Kumar aged about 50 years and 5 months in a vehicular a...
M/S. Cable Corporation of India Limited vs.m/s. Jay Pee Sports Interna ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 789/2016 Pronounced on:31. 07.2018 M/S. CABLE CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.Goel and Mr.Shivam Goel, Versus Advs. M/S. JAY PEE SPORTS INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ANR. Through Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS $~J- * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This petition is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act) seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator in terms of the arbitration clause being Clause 31 of the General Conditions of the Contract Agreement dated 09.04.2011.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of power cables. The petitioner also undertakes the work of manufacture, supply, laying of cables, erection, installation and testing and commissioning of cable work/system. It is pleaded that the respondent No.1-Jaypee Sports International Ltd....
Christian Louboutin Sas vs.ashish Bansal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:11. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:31. t July, 2018 + CS(COMM) 503/2016, IA No.5766/2016 CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Rashi Punia and Mr.Shamim Nooreyezdan, Advocates. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA ASHISH BANSAL & ANR. Through None being ex parte. ..... Defendants YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for permanent injunction, infringement of trademark, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts against the defendants.2. The brief facts leading to the filing of this suit, as alleged, are:-"a) the plaintiff is a well-known French company famous for its high end luxury products. The Plaintiff derives its name from Mr.Christian Louboutin, the famous designer. The Plaintiff is well- known for its womens shoes with its distinctive Red soles. The Plaintiff has also branched out into handbags and mens shoes. The success, repute and well-known character of the Plaint...
Manmohan Gupta vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~41 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"31st July, 2018 CRL. M.C. 897/2018 and Crl.M.A.3328/2018 (stay) MANMOHAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Advocate versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Special PP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA for CBI.1. ORDER (ORAL) The petition at hand has been presented invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer that the records of the court of Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) relating to the criminal case arising out of the charge sheet No.10/2017 in first information report (FIR) of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) vide RC No.219/16/E/0009 be called for and directions be given to the trail Judge not to insist on production of blood family surety and for the local surety produced by the petitioner (accused ...
Rajiv Rajpal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~62 & 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3772/2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2018 MS. VINNY RAJPAL STATE & ANR versus + CRL.M.C. 3774/2018 AND RAJIV RAJPAL STATE & ANR versus Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Tushar Saini, Advocate. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Lavkesh Kumar (Crl. M.C. 3772/2018) Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ajeet Kumar (Crl. M.C. 3774/2018) For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3107.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 28878/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 3772/2018 & Crl. M.A. 28883/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 3774/2018 CRL.M.C. 3772 & 3774/2018 Page 1 of 3 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. 3772/2018 & Crl. M.C. 3774/2018 1. The petitioner, in Crl. M.C. 3772/2018, seeks quashing of FIR No.11 of 2017 under Sectionsof the IPC Polic...
Abhishek Joshi vs.state (Represented by : Nct of Delhi & Anr.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 182/2016 and Crl. M.A.No.998/2016 (Stay) ABHISHEK JOSHI ...... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Salil Kumar Jha, Advocate versus STATE ( REPRESENTED BY: NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Represented by: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with Insp.Gurmail Singh, PS EOW CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.474/2013 under Sections 406/420/468/471/120-B registered at PS Patel Nagar and being investigated by PS Economic Offences Wing, Delhi Police. Though respondent No.2 has been served, however, none appears on behalf of respondent No.2. In response to the petition, Status Report has already been filed by the State.2. The arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner in respect of the quashing of FIR in question are that firstly, the Delhi Police had no jurisdiction to register the FIR nor the Courts in Delhi t...
Sushil Kumar Sahni vs.umesh Kumar Sahni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 31, 2018 + FAO(OS) 206/2017, C.M. Appl. No.24796/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR SAHNI Through: Mr. D.S. Chauhan, Advocate ..... Appellant versus UMESH KUMAR SAHNI Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr. Siddharth Nath, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % ORDER S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) The appellants grievance is that by the impugned order, the learned Single Judge in a pending suit granted the plaintiffs/applicants request for proportionate monthly mesne profits determining at ` 10,000/- per month. The learned single Judge also stated that such amount would be deducted from the value of the defendants/appellants share in the property. The parties in these proceedings are contesting two proceedings C.S. (OS) No.1269/2008, in which the respondent is the plaintiff and C.S. (OS) No.1467/2010, which was filed by one Vinay Kumar Sahni, the brother of these parties. These two sui...
Praveen Kumar Goel vs.state (Govt of Nct Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2018
$~23 & 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2/2016 & CRL.M.A. 14/2016 PRAVEEN KUMAR GOEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.P. Singh, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shiv Upadhyaya, Adv. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 1197/2016 & CRL.M.A. 5133/2016 ANAND KUMAR MAHAJAN & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Rattan, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Crl. M.C. nos.2/2016 & 1197/2016 Page 1 of 9 1. On the basis of supplementary report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr. PC) in the wake of investigation into First Information Report (FIR) no.3of police station Dwarka involving offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, 120B, 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the petitioners stand summoned as accused by order dated 02.07....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »