Delhi Court June 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saroj Kumar Jha vs.commissioner Workmens Compensation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6304/2018 SAROJ KUMAR JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate with the petitioner in person. versus COMMISSIONER WORKMENS COMPENSATION & ORS Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Umesh Sharma, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Abhinav Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.24251/2018 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6304/2018 3. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: (i) Quash or modify or set aside Section 1 (6) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 to the extent so that it covers all the workers/employees/labourers or by whatsoever name the workmen may be known as to be eligible to be able to raise their W.P. (C) No....
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.gaurav & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA5702015 & CM No.24342/2018 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED Through: versus Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate. ..... Appellant GAURAV & ANR Through: .....Respondent None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment/order dated 24th April, 2015 by which the suit for recovery filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff bank (hereinafter, Plaintiff bank) was dismissed. The judgement of the Trial Court dismisses the suit on the ground that the statements of accounts have not been duly proved under Section 65B of the India Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter, Evidence Act).2. In the appeal, notice was issued on 25th August, 2015. On the same date, a representative of the Plaintiff bank was appointed as a receiver. The receiver was directed to take over physical possession of the vehicle, and in case the... RESPONDENTS/Defendants (hereinafter, Defendants) were to pay t...
Deepak vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~45 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1193/2018 & CRL.M.A. 9906/2018 Reserved for order :31. t May, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 DEEPAK Through Mr. Jaideep Malik, Mr. Ravi ........ Petitioner Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Soni, Advs. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for NCT of Delhi. Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The applicant Deepak seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 qua FIR No.141/2018, registered at PS Model Town, under Section 376 read with Section 313 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 submitting inter alia to the effect that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case and that the petitioner and the complainant had a long standing relationship which commenced from friendship to talking and chatting on the phone and then grew into a position...
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (Ntpc) vs.navayuga Engineering ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :31. 01.2018 Judgment pronounced on :01. 06.2018 FAO(OS) (C) 227/2017& CM APPL. 47305/2017 NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. (NTPC) .....Appellant Through Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi and Mr. Karan Minocha, Advs. versus NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD. (NECL) .....Respondent Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Milanka Chaudhary, Mr.Sarojanand Jha and Ms.Naina Dubey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.1. The National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC hereafter) appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), questioning two orders; one, disposing of a Section 9 petition by the respondent- (hereafter Navayuga) and FAO(OS) (C) 227/2017 Page 1 of 11 the other, dismissing the application seeking review of the first order, both passed by the ld. ...
Rajesh Sharma vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 491/2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 06.2018 RAJESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Janender Kumar Chumbak, Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. Kartikeya Singh and Mr. R.P. Saini and Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Satish Agrawal, Standing Counsel for DRI CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0106.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 491/2018 & Crl. M. (Bail) 362/2018 (Interim Bail) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in SC No.11A/2013 under Sections 22(c)/25A/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 as also an interim bail.2. Pending the subject petition, the petitioner filed the subject BAIL APPLN. 491/2018 Page 1 of 4 application being Crl. M. (Bail) 362/2018 seeking interim bail for the purpose of medical tr...
The Officer Commanding vs.ram Adhar Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 to 18 and 21 to 23 * % Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2069/2015 & CM No.3731/2015 & 3221/2016 15 OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus HARI SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. + W.P.(C) 2071/2015 & CM No.3735/2015 & 3220/2016 16 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus MEWA LAL Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2081/2015 & CM No.3744/2015 & 3222/2016 Birbal, Advs. W.P.(C) 2069/2015, 2071/2015, 2081/2015, 6624/2015 W.P.(C) 6625/2015, 6626/2015 & 6637/2015 Page 1 of 6 17 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti...
M/S Xact Studio International vs.m/s Liwona Sp. Z. O. O
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h March, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 M/S XACT STUDIO INTERNATIONAL RFA8492016 Through: Mr. A. J.Bhambhani, Senior ..... Appellant versus Advocate and Mr. J.K. Srivastava, Advocate. (M:9810690846) M/S LIWONA SP. Z. O. O ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Dhingra, Mr. Praveen Kumar & Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates (M-9430009409). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 M/s. Liwona S. P. Zoo, a Polish company (hereinafter Plaintiff) filed the subject suit under Order XXXVII CPC seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.33,722.95 euros (in Indian Rs.23,78,702/-) and 63,64,740 PLN currency (Rs.10,77,040/- in Indian rupees) along with interest against M/s. Xact Studio International through its directors (hereinafter Defendant).2. The Defendant placed orders with the Plaintiff for printing and dispatching of books to various customers of the Plaintiff in foreign countries such as Bellona, Poland, Greece an...
Mohit Gupta vs.sh. Desh Pal Gupta & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2613/2008 $~9 * + MOHIT GUPTA SH. DESH PAL GUPTA & OTHERS Through versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Nishant Datta and Mr. Pradeep Bhardwaj, Advocatse with LR of D-1 Mr. Puneet Gupta. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % ORDER0106.2018 I.A No.7884/2018 (U/o 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by LR of D-2), I.A. 7885/2018 (delay of 547 days) & I.A78862018 (delay in refiling) 1. By these applications, the legal heirs of the deceased defendant no.2 seeks directions for setting aside of the preliminary decree for partition passed in terms of the judgment dated 5.10.2016 of a learned Single Judge of this Court.2. The judgment passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 5.10.2016 notes that from 31.8.2016 no one appeared for the defendants. Defendant nos. 2 and 3 had filed their separate written statements. Issues were framed in the suit on 10.3.2010 whereafter plaintiff led evidence and plaintiffs witness was being cross examin...
The Officer Commanding vs.jai Govind
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 to 18 and 21 to 23 * % Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2069/2015 & CM No.3731/2015 & 3221/2016 15 OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus HARI SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. + W.P.(C) 2071/2015 & CM No.3735/2015 & 3220/2016 16 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus MEWA LAL Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2081/2015 & CM No.3744/2015 & 3222/2016 Birbal, Advs. W.P.(C) 2069/2015, 2071/2015, 2081/2015, 6624/2015 W.P.(C) 6625/2015, 6626/2015 & 6637/2015 Page 1 of 6 17 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti...
Sanjay Kumar vs.rajesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :28th May, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA2492017 SANJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate (M:85868. 6803). RAJESH KUMAR versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Bassi and Mr. Sanyam Malik, Advocates (M:98100. 1293). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 Smt. Laxmi Devi was the owner of property bearing Nos. Y-316 and Y-317 which is a land measuring 50 sq. yds. (25 sq. yds. each) situated in J.J.Colony, Camp No.1, Nangloi, Delhi-110041 (hereinafter, suit property).2. The Respondent/Plaintiff - Mr. Rajesh Kumar (hereinafter, Plaintiff) and the Appellant/Defendant - Mr. Sanjay Kumar (hereinafter, Defendant) are the sons of Smt. Laxmi Devi. A mutual agreement was duly signed by her by which she fixed the share amongst her three sons i.e. the Plaintiff, the Defendant and the Sh. Ajay Kumar. The manner in which the division was made by her is contained in the said mutu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »