Delhi Court June 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Agya Import Limited vs.joint Commissioner of Customs (Siib-Import),icd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6492/2018 Date of decision:1. t June, 2018. AGYA IMPORT LIMITED .Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Anjali J.Manish and Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advocates. versus JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (SIIB-IMPORT),ICD, TUGHLAKABAD, NEW DELHI & ANR. Through: Mr. Standing Counsel for Customs. ...Respondents Sr. Sanjeev Narula, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Counsel for the respondents, who is present on advance notice, has raised a preliminary objection and states that the impugned communication/order dated 28th May, 2018 is appealable before Commissioner (Appeals).2. Counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to paragraphs U, V, W and X of the present writ petition and submits that in spite of statutory appellate remedy, in some cases, Delhi High Court has interfered with the orders under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act, for short), hence relega...
Shankar Goswami vs.sarita Goswami & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on :8. h March, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 RFA1822017 & CM No.6210/2017 (stay) SHANKAR GOSWAMI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate. (M:9899937365) with Appellant in person. versus SARITA GOSWAMI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumit Chander, Ms. Shikha Sapra and Mr. Jatin Choudhary, Advocates. (M:9810024126 & 8860104587) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 This appeal arises out of order dated 4th November 2016 of the Ld. Trial Court by which the suit filed by Sh. Shankar Goswami- Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has been dismissed as being barred by res judicata.2. The background of this litigation is that a suit came to be filed being CS No.759/2010 (hereinafter, Suit No.1) by Smt. Sarita Goswami- the wife of Sh. Vijay Goswami. Sh. Shankar Goswami and Sh. Vijay Goswami are real brothers. Smt. Sarita Goswami filed a suit for recovery of possession, damages ...
Dr. Saiqa Ikram vs.jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 01, 2018 W.P.(C) 6478/2018 & CM248732018 DR. SAIQA IKRAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Advocate versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA AND ORS. Through: Ms. Zeba Khair, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks a mandamus to first respondent to decide the Representations of 25th January, 2018, 27th February, 2018, 2nd April, 2018, 19th April, 2018 and 24th April, 2018. According to petitioners counsel there is no response to the said Representations.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to first respondent to effectively consider aforesaid Representations (Annexure P-12, P-14 to P-17) to decide these Representations within a period of six weeks, by way of a speaking order and the fate of the Representations be conveyed to petitioner within a week thereafter, to enable petitioner to ava...
Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee and Ors. Vs.union of India an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6377/2018 & CM No.24518/2018 % Date of decision:1. t June, 2018 DELHI SIKH GURDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A. K. Mishra, Mr. Harpreet Singh Hora and Mr. Amit Kr. Sharma, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv.for R- 1/UOI Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC- GNCTD with Mr. Abhinav Goyal, Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. with Mr. Vinod Kr. (Section Officer) CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition seeks the following prayers :-"1. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased issue a to W.P.(C)No.6377/2018 Page 1 of 3 writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction in the similar nature for :-"declaring the provisions ...
M/S. Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.gaurav Tandon
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA5772015 & CM No.24720/2018 M/S. ICICI BANK LTD. Through: versus Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate. ..... Appellant GAURAV TANDON Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. A suit for recovery was filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff - ICICI Bank Ltd. (hereinafter Plaintiff Bank) for a sum of Rs.6,69,591/- against the Respondent/Defendant, Mr. Gaurav Tandon (hereinafter, Defendant) under Order XXXVII CPC. The said suit was dismissed vide judgment dated 21st March, 2015. The present First Appeal arises out of the said judgement dismissing the suit.2. The case in brief of the Plaintiff Bank is that the Defendant is proprietor of M/s. Balaji Engineering. He approached the Plaintiff Bank for grant of overdraft credit facility (hereinafter, OD facility) in February, 2008 to meet his normal business requirements. The said OD facility to the tune of Rs.6 Lakhs was san...
Virendra Singh vs.managing Committee Haryana Shakti Sr Secondary Schoo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
#1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA2792017 VIRENDRA SINGH Judgment delivered on:01. 06.2018 ..... Appellant versus MANAGING COMMITTEE HARYANA SHAKTI SR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Avadh Kaushik and Mr. Robin Singh, Advocates : Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Rai, Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Mr. Divyank Rana, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Jawahar Raja, ASC with Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advocate for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.22943/2018 (Stay) The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 instituted on behalf of the applicant/respondent No.1 seeking stay of the operation of communication No.F.DDE/[NW- B]./2017/Aided/HSSS/461-465 dated 12.06.2017 and the Show Cause Notice LPA2792017 Page 1 of 3 dated 21.05.2018, both issued by the Directorate of Educa...
Ircon International Ltd vs.patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 05.2018 Pronounced on:01. 06.2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 104/2018 & CAV4642018 & CM APPL. 20010- 20011/2018 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD Mr. Tejas Karia with Mr. Gauhar Mirza & ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Oommen, Advs. versus PATIL RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv. for Caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant (hereafter IRCON) unsuccessfully challenged an arbitration award (dated 6 August, 2015) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act); the award allowed some claims of the respondent (hereafter described as Patil), along with interest.2. The facts are that IRCON awarded the work of Manufacture, Supply, Transportation and Delivery of Pre-stressed Mono-Block Concrete Sleepers for Broad Gauge Railway Track (1676 mm) suitable for 60 kg rail section, for the re...
Murlidhar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :26th May,, 2018 Date of decision :1. t June, 2018 + CRL.A. 279/2002 MURLIDHAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. M. L. Yadav, Adv along with appellant in person. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Sachin Dahiya, PS Subhash Place. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeal arises out of judgement dated 9th November 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi by which the Appellant has been convicted under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC) and Section 397 IPC and sentenced on 19th November 2001 to rigorous imprisonment for five years and rigorous imprisonment for seven years, both sentences to run concurrently.2. The incident dates back to 31st May, 1999 when Mrs. Kamlesh was present in her house along with her daughter Miss. Jyoti and son, Master. Kartik. Her husband was not at home. Her daughter saw three...
The Officer Commanding vs.chandrika
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 to 18 and 21 to 23 * % Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2069/2015 & CM No.3731/2015 & 3221/2016 15 OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus HARI SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. + W.P.(C) 2071/2015 & CM No.3735/2015 & 3220/2016 16 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus MEWA LAL Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2081/2015 & CM No.3744/2015 & 3222/2016 Birbal, Advs. W.P.(C) 2069/2015, 2071/2015, 2081/2015, 6624/2015 W.P.(C) 6625/2015, 6626/2015 & 6637/2015 Page 1 of 6 17 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti...
Salman Khurshid vs.delhi Public School Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 05.2018 Pronounced on:01. 06.2018 FAO (OS) 260/2017, C.M. APPL.35229/2017 & 35231/2017 SALMAN KHURSHID ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Imtiaz Ahmed, Ms. Sakshi Kotiyal and Sh. Vikramaditya Singh, Advocates, with the appellant Sh. Salman Khurshid in person. versus DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Bhuwan Gugnani and Sh. Puspendra Pratap Singh and Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This is a plaintiffs appeal, challenging the rejection of his application for ad interim injunction, suspending operation of his expulsion from the Delhi Public School, Mathura Road, New Delhi (the first respondent, hereafter the society). The appellant (hereafter the plaintiff was President of the society for three terms, and was its life member, and had been a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »