Delhi Court June 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vega Auto Accessories (P) Ltd. Vs.s.k. Jain Bros. Helmet (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1st June, 2018 CS(COMM) 837/2017 VEGA AUTO ACCESSORIES (P) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Diva Arora Menon, Mr. Rajat Katyal and Mr. Man Mohan Mishra, Advs. Versus S.K. JAIN BROS. HELMET (I) PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Ishani Chandra, Mr. Ankit Rastogi and Mr. Bibhunanda Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14568/2017 (of plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC), IA No.123/2018 (of the defendant under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) & IA No.1903/2018 (of defendant u/O XI R-1(10) CPC) 1. The plaintiff has sued the defendant for permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered design in relation to helmets, and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit was entertained and summons/notice of the application for interim relief ordered to be issued, though no ex-parte injunction granted.3. The counsel for the defendant appeared on 12th December, 2017 and stated that he did not know a...
The Officer Commanding vs.mewa Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 to 18 and 21 to 23 * % Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2069/2015 & CM No.3731/2015 & 3221/2016 15 OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus HARI SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. + W.P.(C) 2071/2015 & CM No.3735/2015 & 3220/2016 16 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus MEWA LAL Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2081/2015 & CM No.3744/2015 & 3222/2016 Birbal, Advs. W.P.(C) 2069/2015, 2071/2015, 2081/2015, 6624/2015 W.P.(C) 6625/2015, 6626/2015 & 6637/2015 Page 1 of 6 17 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti...
Radhey Shyam vs.varsha Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :6. h March, 2018 Date of decision :1st June, 2018 RFA7342016 & CM APPL.34582/2016 RADHEY SHYAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate. (M-9818610321) versus VARSHA YADAV ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satya Narayan, Advocate. (M-9810532043) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 Shri Radhey Shyam, Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter Plaintiff) entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 16th January, 2011 with the Respondent/Defendant Smt. Varsha Yadav (hereinafter `Defendant') for sale of property admeasuring 300 square yards (60 ft. x 45 ft.) in Khasra No.559 which is situated in the area of village Bhalswa, Jahangirpuri, Delhi, known as Rajiv Nagar Extension Delhi (hereinafter Suit Property) for a total sale consideration of Rs.29,50,000/-.2. The document executed was called as Bayana (Ikrar Nama). The same is admitted by parties and is exhibited as Exhibit-P-1. It is claimed that that the Defe...
U P Project Corporation Limited & Anr. Vs.m/s Maa Krupa Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on :12. h March, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 RFA5392014 U P PROJECT CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sumit Sinha & Mr. Sinha Shrey, Advocates. versus M/S MAA KRUPA ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K. S. Verma & Mr. Sachin CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Verma, Advocates. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 A suit for recovery was filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff - Maa Krupa Enterprises (sole proprietary concern of Mr. Naresh Kumar Soral) (hereinafter Plaintiff) against the Appellants/Defendants U.P. Project Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter UPPCL) and the Project Manager of UPPCL for a sum of Rs.5,05,328/-. The said suit was decreed along with interest @12% per annum by the Trial Court.2. On 20th October, 2012, the following issues were framed in the suit. 1. Whether this court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain this suit?. OPD1 and OPD2 2. Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder to nece...
Hardayal Singh vs.directorate of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 01, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6407/2018 & CM Nos. 24598-24600/2018 HARDAYAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Neeta Mishra and Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks implementation of Seventh Pay Commission while relying upon order of 17.10.2017 of respondent-Directorate of Education and the arrears of Sixth Pay Commission and the benefit of second ACP along with additional conveyance charges. Vide order of 22.02.2018 petitioner stands transferred from India Gate branch to Dhakka Dhirpur branch.2. Before approaching this Court, petitioner has to first seek the relief as sought in this petition from the respondents. It has not been done.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of th...
Nipun Malhotra vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9643/2017, CM Nos. 39251/2017, 12571 & 14652/2018 NIPUN MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jai Dehadrai, Ms. Shivangini Gupta and Mr. Sidharth Arora, Advs. along with Mr. Nipun Malhotra and Ms. Preeti Singh in person. Mr. Aman Panwar and Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advs. for P-3. Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj and Ms. Neha Mathen, Advs. for P-4. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC along with Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Adv. for R-5. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for R-7/MORT&H. Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aakarshan Sahay and Ms. Neha Khandelwal, Advs. for R-9. Mr. Sandeep Narain, Adv. for R- 10/Ashok Leyland Ltd.). Mr. Krishna Kumar Sharma, Adv. for Mr. A.S. Kulshrestha, Adv. for DMRC. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. W.P.(C)No.9643/2017 Page 1 of 74 Palak R...
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs.larsen & Toubro Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 366/2017 Reserved on:7. h March, 2018 Date of decision :1. t June, 2018 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.V.N. Koura, Ms.Paramjeet Benipal and Mr.Abhinav Tandon, Advs. versus LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar and Mr.Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr. Advs. with Mr.Dhirendra Negi, Mr.Ananya Kumar and Ms.Pragya Chauhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed challenging the Arbitral Award dated 18th May 2017 read with the correction Order dated 23rd June 2017, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three Arbitrators (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Award). The Impugned Award holds the petitioners claim for Price Discount on account of alleged delay by the respondent in completion of Contract as unjustified and contrary to the terms of th...
Anurag Sanghi & Anr vs.knitpro International
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. 04.2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 06.2018 FAO4432017 ANURAG SANGHI & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chander Lall, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Gaurav Miglani and Ms. Samreen Khan, Advs. versus KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advs. + FAO4452017 ANURAG SANGHI & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chander Lall, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Gaurav Miglani and Ms. Samreen Khan, Advs. versus KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advs. + FAO4462017 ANURAG SANGHI & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chander Lall, Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Gaurav Miglani and Ms. Samreen Khan, Advs. versus KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL FAO443 445 & 446 OF2017..... Respondent Page 1 of 36 T...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.kishan Chand Saini (Since Deceased) Through L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :09. 05.2018 Judgment Pronounced on :01.06.2018 WP(C) 5507/2007 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Mr.A.S.Dateer, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus KISHAN CHAND SAINI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRs ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ravi Kant Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The petitioners in this writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India have challenged the order dated 28.03.2007 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.1, New Delhi (in short POCGIT) in LCA No.5/98 on an application filed by the respondent under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in brief ID Act) directing the petitioners to pay the respondent over-time wages for the period from 21.08.1977 to 11.12.1995 within three months failing which interest @ 9% shall be payable.2. The facts giving rise to file the present writ...
Harkesh vs.union of India ( Ministry of Railway)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * % 4 + 5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 FAO1092017 & CM APPLN. 8273/2017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates versus HARKESH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Pandey and Mr. Alok Kumar Palai proxy for Mr. Yogesh Swroop, Advocate FAO452018 HARKESH Through: Mr. Saurabh Pandey and Mr. Alok Kumar Palai proxy for Mr. Yogesh Swroop, Advocate ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA ( MINISTRY OF RAILWAY) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Railway Claim Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to the parents of Late Pradeep Sharma alias Sunny. FAO1092017 & FAO452018 Page 1 of 6 2. Harkesh and Savitri Devi (Respondent no.1 and 2 in FAO1092017 and appellants in FAO452018)...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »