Delhi Court June 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India vs.harkesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * % 4 + 5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 FAO1092017 & CM APPLN. 8273/2017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates versus HARKESH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Pandey and Mr. Alok Kumar Palai proxy for Mr. Yogesh Swroop, Advocate FAO452018 HARKESH Through: Mr. Saurabh Pandey and Mr. Alok Kumar Palai proxy for Mr. Yogesh Swroop, Advocate ..... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA ( MINISTRY OF RAILWAY) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ]. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Railway Claim Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to the parents of Late Pradeep Sharma alias Sunny. FAO1092017 & FAO452018 Page 1 of 6 2. Harkesh and Savitri Devi (Respondent no.1 and 2 in FAO1092017 and appellants in FAO452018)...
Nipun Kumar Malhotra vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5142/2018 NIPUN KUMAR MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jai Dehadrai, Ms. Shivangini Gupta and Mr. Sidharth Arora, Advs. along with Mr. Nipun Malhotra and Ms. Preeti Singh in person. % GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC along with Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Adv. for R-2. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advs. for DTC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER0106.2018 For order recording reasons, see W.P.(C)No.9643/2017. JUNE01 2018 aj/kr ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J...
M/S. Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.ashok Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA5722015 & CM No.24679/2018 M/S. ICICI BANK LTD. Through: versus Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate. ..... Appellant ASHOK SHARMA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. A suit for recovery was filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff - ICICI Bank Ltd. (hereinafter Plaintiff Bank) for a sum of Rs.5,96,913/- against the Respondent/Defendant, Mr. Ashok Kumar (hereinafter, Defendant) under Order XXXVII CPC. The said suit was dismissed vide judgment dated 7th May, 2015 against which the present Appeal has been filed. Notice was issued in the Appeal on 25th August 2015. Initially the Defendants were unserved as no process fee was filed. However, thereafter the Defendants were unserved as they had left the place. Steps were then taken for serving the Defendants through publication. Service was finally recorded as having been completed by the order of the Registrar date...
The Officer Commanding vs.har Govind
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 to 18 and 21 to 23 * % Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2069/2015 & CM No.3731/2015 & 3221/2016 15 OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus HARI SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. + W.P.(C) 2071/2015 & CM No.3735/2015 & 3220/2016 16 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus MEWA LAL Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2081/2015 & CM No.3744/2015 & 3222/2016 Birbal, Advs. W.P.(C) 2069/2015, 2071/2015, 2081/2015, 6624/2015 W.P.(C) 6625/2015, 6626/2015 & 6637/2015 Page 1 of 6 17 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti...
Kaushalya Sharma vs.kiran Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h May, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA1722017 & CM APPL. 6003/2017 KAUSHALYA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, along (M-9873576770) Advocate with Appellant in person. KIRAN DEVI & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P. P Ahuja, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 A suit for partition and permanent injunction was filed by LRs (legal representatives) of Shri Shiv Charan in respect of the suit property measuring 2 bighas 13 biswas which is part of Khasra No.141/situated in village Vasant Nagar, PO Vasant Vihar, New Delhi (hereinafter, suit property).2. The said suit was originally filed and listed before the original side of the High Court on 5th March, 2003. On 2nd November, 2006, a preliminary decree for partition by metes and bounds was passed in the following terms. ..............12. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances which are undisp...
Shiv Singh & Ors vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~1 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 06.2018 Through: Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate. ..... Appellants ..... Respondent Versus FAO392011 SHIV SINGH & ORS + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) Through: UNION OF INDIA This appeal impugns an order dated 01.09.2010 passed by the 1. Railway Claims Tribunal, declining the appellants claim for compensation on account of demise of their son Mr. Arvind Kumar, who allegedly died in an untoward railway accident.2. It is the appellants case that while travelling from a train on 15.01.2009 from New Delhi to Ghaziabad, the deceased fell-off near Mandavli Phatak due to a sudden jerk in the train; he sustained grievous injuries and was taken to Walia Nursing Home and thereafter to LNJP Hospital, New Delhi where he succumbed to his injuries on 19.01.2009. Since, the ticket was not found on him, the impugned order did not consider him to be a bona fide passenger. Although, the brother of the d...
Shri R. K. Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 01, 2018 Through: Mr. V.K. Raina, Advocate .....Petitioner SHRI R. K. GUPTA + W.P.(C) 6163/2018 & CMs. 23832-33/2018 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. B.K. Sood and Mr. Harish Gaur, Advocates for respondents No.2 and 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner was prematurely retired on 10th July, 2017 and his Representation seeking revocation of his premature retirement has been rejected vide impugned order of 29th December, 2017, which is a cryptic order. It gives no reason as to why petitioners Representation has been rejected.2. In view of aforesaid, Director General of Bureau of Indian Standards is called upon to reconsider petitioners Representation of 13th August, 2017 and 27th July, 2017 and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of six weeks. The fate of Representations be conveyed to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that pe...
Naresh Handa vs.sunil Kochhar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t June, 2018 CM(M) 734/2017 & CM No.25163/2017 (for stay) NARESH HANDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. L. K. Singh and Ms. Saira Parveen, Advs. SUNIL KOCHHAR Versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 2nd May, 2017 in CS No.602/2015 of the Court of Additional District Judge-02 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. deciding the following issue:-"Whether the suit is liable to be stayed under Section 10 CPC in view of Civil Suit No.titled Sunir Kochhar Vs. Ravinder Handa & Ors. and CS No.title Ravinder Handa Vs. Union of India & Ors. filed earlier to present suit?. (OPD). ordered to be treated as a preliminary issue, in a suit filed by respondent against petitioner, and holding that though there was no ground to stay the trial but the final decision in the suit will await the outcome of the previo...
M/S. Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.dilkash Star Vision & Communication Pvt. Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA5752015 & CM No.24719/2018 M/S. ICICI BANK LTD. Through: versus Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Advocate. ..... Appellant DILKASH STAR VISION & COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. A suit for recovery was filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff - ICICI Bank Ltd. (hereinafter Plaintiff Bank) for a sum of Rs.5,04,114.88/- against the... RESPONDENTS/Defendants (hereinafter, Defendants). Defendant No.1 is a Private Limited Company, and Defendant Nos.2 and 3 are the directors, in charge of the day to day affairs of Defendant No.1. The said suit of the Plaintiff Bank was dismissed vide judgment dated 5th February, 2015. The present First Appeal arises out of the said judgement dismissing the suit.2. In the Appeal notice was issued on 25th August 2015. None appeared for the... RESPONDENTS. Service was thereafter effected by publication. On 7...
Praveen Kumar vs.parul
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
#7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 06.2018 MAT.APP.(F.C.) (Exemption), CM APPL.24648/2018 (Stay) & CM APPL.24649/2018 (Condonation of Delay) 138/2018, CM APPL.24647/2018 PK P versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Vijay Dalal and Mr. Dushyant Kumar, Advocates : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeal belatedly impugns the order dated 07.02.2018, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 138/2018 Page 1 of 4 passed by the learned Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi in HMA Case No.1550/2017, titled as P K vs. P, whereby the application of the respondent-wife under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) was partly allowed, directing the appellant-husband to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month, as interim maintenance to Master A, the minor son of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »