Delhi Court June 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arti vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-08-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on :23. d April, 2018 Date of decision :8th June, 2018 BAIL APPL. 2283/2017 ARTI Through ........ Petitioner Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr. C.M. Sangwan & Mr. Anurag Sahay, Advs. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta & Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with ASI Sukhbir Singh, PS Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.ORDER1 The applicant / petitioner Arti w/o Sh. Buddan Paswan, vide the present bail application No.2283/2017, the applicant / petitioner seeks the grant of regular bail in terms of Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 submitting to the effect that she is incarcerated since the date of her arrest on 15.09.2017 qua the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 29 r/w Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in relation to the...
Mehmood Pracha vs.intelligence Bureau & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1738/2018 % Reserved on:31. t May, 2018 Date of decision :6. h June, 2018 Through :... Petitioner in person ..... Petitioner MEHMOOD PRACHA INTELLIGENCE BUREAU & ORS. versus .... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Manik Dogra, Adv. for the Union of India CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petitioner, a practicing Advocate of this court, has filed the present writ petition submitting that the same is in public interest. By way of the petition, he seeks the following reliefs : (a) To constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT), which is responsible to report only to this Hon'ble Court. (b) To issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Special Investigation Team constituted by this Hon 'ble Court, to investigate into all the W.P.(Crl.)No.1738/2018 Page 1 of 31 aspects of the hostage crisis which hostages have...
Reliance Power Ltd. & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM No.2839/2018 (for directions) in WP(C)No.7334/2015 % Reserved on :23. d March, 2018 Date of decision :6th June, 2018 RELIANCE POWER LTD. & ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv alongwith Mr. Mahesh Agarwala, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG alongwith Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal, Ms. Vivya Nagpal, Mr. Yashish, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arjun Aggarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.2839/2018 (for directions - u/s 151 of the CPC) 1. This application, seeking directions, has been filed by the... Petitioner No.2 - Sasan Power Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as SPL). CM No.2839/2018 in WP(C) 7334/2015 Page 1 of 20 2. The factual narration, as per the writ petition, is that the... Petitioner No.1 - Reliance Power Ltd.(hereinafter referred to as Reliance) is a leading private sector power ge...
Allied Integrated Society (Regd.) and Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 05.2018 Pronounced on:06. 06.2018 W.P.(C) 5912/2018 & CM APPL. 23033-23034/2018 ALLIED INTEGRATED SOCIETY (REGD.) AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Through: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC, GNCTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present common petition, by four non-governmental organizations, challenges a tender condition formulated by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi (hereafter GNCTD or NCT) while inviting bids for the mid-day cooked meals scheme formulated by it. The petitioners allege that the eligibility condition of a minimum threshold of Rupees three crores average financial turnover, during the previous three years, is arbitrary.2. All the petitioners are voluntary non-governmental organizations (NGOs) formed between 1995 and 2006. They are ISO c...
Aanya Kameshwar and Ors. Vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprstha University a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :-"30.05.2018 Date of Decision:-"01.06.2018 W.P.(C) 5285/2018 AANYA KAMESHWAR AND ORS. Through Adv. Versus ........ Petitioners Ms.Karuna Nandy, GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Abhay Chattopadhyay, Adv. with Ms.Sarita, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Adv. with Mr.Priyam Mehta, Adv. for BCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J C.M. No.20524/2018 (for interim directions) 1. The... Petitioners/Applicants, who are final year students of the B.A. LLB (Hons.) course at the Respondent No.2/College, which is affiliated with Respondent No.1/Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (hereinafter referred to as GGSIP University), have filed the present application seeking inter alia interim directions to the... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 to implement the recommendations made in the Report of the Committee Constituted by the Vice Cha...
Officer Commanding vs.hari Shankar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 to 18 and 21 to 23 * % Date of Decision:01. t June, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2069/2015 & CM No.3731/2015 & 3221/2016 15 OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus HARI SHANKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advs. + W.P.(C) 2071/2015 & CM No.3735/2015 & 3220/2016 16 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Adv. with Capt. Juhi, Officer Commanding. Mr. Jitender Kumar, Deputy Director, MOD. versus MEWA LAL Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Ajay ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 2081/2015 & CM No.3744/2015 & 3222/2016 Birbal, Advs. W.P.(C) 2069/2015, 2071/2015, 2081/2015, 6624/2015 W.P.(C) 6625/2015, 6626/2015 & 6637/2015 Page 1 of 6 17 THE OFFICER COMMANDING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti...
M/S Eureka Forbes Limited vs.m/s Devansh Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :28. h May, 2018 Date of Decision:1. t June, 2018 + RFA402017 & CM APPLs. 1305/2017, 16086/2017 M/S EUREKA FORBES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Kr. Singh & Ms. Geetika Matta, Advocates. versus M/S DEVANSH REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Gupta & Mr. Kuber Giri, Advocates (M-9811999978). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 A short issue as to the mesne profits/ use and occupation charges payable by the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) survives in the present appeal.2. Respondent/Plaintiff - M/s Devansh Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter Plaintiff) filed a suit against the Defendant - M/s Eureka Forbes Limited seeking physical vacant possession of the property bearing No.4/12, Asaf Ali Road, near Delhi Gate, New Delhi-110002 (hereinafter, suit property). The Plaintiff claimed that it had acquired title to the same as per sale deed dated 22nd September, ...
Union of India vs.tilak Raj Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :12. h February, 2018 Date of decision 1st June, 2018 + RFA2452017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate. versus TILAK RAJ SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan Arya, Advocate person. in with (M:8920561855) Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The journey from Meerut to Ludhiana undertaken by the Plaintiff has proved to be a very long one. An unfortunate incident that occurred on 20th October, 1987 i.e. three decades ago is the subject matter of the present appeal. It has been over 30 years and the Plaintiff has been running from pillar to post, seeking compensation, after having had his left leg amputated in a train accident.2. The Respondent/Plaintiff, Mr. Tilak Raj Singh (hereinafter Plaintiff) boarded a II general class compartment of the Frontier Mail from Meerut Cantt. to Ludhiana (hereinafter, train). When the train reached Muzaffarnagar, ab...
Laxmi Kant Sharma and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 01, 2018 * + W.P.(C) 6423/2018 LAXMI KANT SHARMA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. R. S. Mishra and Mr. A. K. Pandey, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through : Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1- 4/UOI. Mr. H. S. Parihar & Mr. K. S. Parihar, Advocates for R-6/RBI. Mr. V. Sudeer and Mr. M. Chandra Sekhar, Advocates for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners Representations seeking the benefit of enhanced gratuity limit from `10 lacs to `20 lacs w.e.f. 1st January, 2016 stand declined vide impugned order of 7th May, 2018 [Annexure P-3 (Colly)]., while noting that the enhancement of ceiling limit of the gratuity amount shall be payable w.e.f. 29th March, 2018. In the Representations [Annexure P-2 (Colly)]., petitioners had relied upon Office Memorandum of 4th August, 2016 (Annexure P-1) which grants similar benefit to Government servants w.e.f. 1st January, 20...
Graphisads Pvt Ltd vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: March 19, 2018 Judgment delivered on: June 01, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5358/2017, CM Nos. 22657/2017, 36665/2017 & 42012/2017 GRAPHISADS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nitin Mittal, Mr. Siddharth Chopra and Mr. Pranvir Sethi, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Shivam Goel, Advs. + W.P.(C) 5543/2017, CM Nos. 23316-23317/2017 M/S. GRAPHISADS PVT. LTD . ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nitin Mittal, Mr. Siddharth Chopra and Mr. Pranvir Sethi, Advs. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Shivam Goel, Advs. + W.P.(C) 6292/2017, CM Nos. 26073-26074/2017 M/S. GRAPHISADAS PRIVATE LIMITED W.P.(C) No.5358/2017 and connected matters ........ Petitioner Page 1 of 70 Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »