Delhi Court June 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mumtaz vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-13-2018
$~R-24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 684/2005 MUMTAZ Through: Appellant in person with Mr. ..... Appellant STATE Saurabh Kansal, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State with SI Manoj Kumar, PS Jahangirpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ORDER (ORAL) % ANU MALHOTRA, J.13.06.2018 1. The matter had vide proceedings dated 12.06.2018 been re- notified for today in view of the CRL.A.646/2005 qua the co-convict Titu @ Irfan being listed for today. Vide a separate judgment of even date, CRL.A.646/2005 in relation to the co-convict Titu @ Irfan produced in judicial custody has been dismissed.2. Arguments have been addressed on behalf of the appellant by the learned counsel for the appellant and on behalf of the State by the learned APP for the State.3. The appellant in response to a specific Court query submits that he does not seek to contest the appeal on merits any more having undergone the impugned sentence awarded on 30.10.2...
Sudhir Sehgal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :30th November, 2017 Date of decision :12th June, 2018 CRL.M.C. 5247/2015 SUDHIR SEHGAL STATE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. APS Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Maninder Jeet Singh, Advocate for Intervenor. SI Navee, PS Subzi Mandi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Vide the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 14.09.2015 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Criminal Revision No.02/2014 whereby the order dated 16.12.2013 of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in the Criminal Complaint No.31was upheld whereby a prima facie case was held to be made out against the CRL.M.C. 5247/2015 Page 1 of 33 petitioner...
Sita vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-12-2018
$~R-46 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 915/2005 SITA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Adv with Ms. Preeti Jakhar, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State with SI B.R. Tyagi, PS Kamla Market. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 12.06.2018 ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. In terms of proceedings dated 04.06.2018, the nominal roll has been received from the Superintendent Central Jail, Tihar New Delhi indicating that the appellant has undergone the entire period of seven years of Rigorous Imprisonment and has also undergone the in default sentence of one year and three months of Rigorous Imprisonment for the non deposit of the composite sum of Rs.15,000/- as imposed vide the impugned order on sentence dated 11.05.2005 and after having served the entire sentence with the sentence in lieu of fine, has been released from jail on 31.05.2010. CRL.A. 915/2005 1 of 7 2. The appellant as per the impugned judgment is ind...
Amanpreet Singh vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Bail Appln. 2060/2017 & Bail Appln. 2070/2017 Judgment reserved on :19. 04.2018 Date of decision :11. h June, 2018 AMANPREET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with IO SI Gulshan. AND INDERPREET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankush Narang, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with IO SI Gulshan. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The Bail Application 2060/2017 & Bail Application 2070/2017 filed by the applicants thereof Amanpreet Singh and Inderpreet Singh both relate to the allegations levelled against them qua FIR No.12/2011, PS EOW, Delhi, under Sections 406/409/420/120B Bail Appln. 2060/2017 & Bail Appln. 2070/2017 Page 1 of 12 Indian Penal...
Mahendra Singh vs.delhi Power Supply Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:11. h June, 2018 + W.P. (C) 5835/2002 MAHENDRA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Mr.Parinav Gupta and Ms.Mansi Gupta, Advocates versus DELHI POWER SUPPLY CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar, Adv. for R/BSES Mr.S.K.Singh, Adv. Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The petitioner Mahendra Singh seeks, by means of this writ petition, quashing of order, dated 15th June, 2002, whereby, consequent on disciplinary proceedings held against him, the Additional General Manager (hereinafter referred to as AGM) of the Delhi Vidyut Board (hereinafter referred to as DVB) the predecessor-Corporation to the present respondent dismissed him from service. The petitioner appealed, on 3rd July, 2002, to the Member (Tech-I) of the DVB, against the impugned punishment order and, having waited, fruitlessly, for s...
Radha Soami Satsang Beas and Anr. Vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6579/2018 RADHA SOAMI SATSANG BEAS & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Adv., with Mr. Pramod Kumar Ahuja and Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Naushad Khan, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR1 The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ/order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus, certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction for quashing of order dated 28.11.2017, demarcation notice dated 28.11.2017, notice/notification dated 19.02.2018 and 01.03.2018, notice/notification dated 03.05.2018, all issued by respondent No.2 and for issuance of a writ/order and/or direction in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the map and report prepared by M/s. Dhyani Consultants Inc., demoli...
Central Bank of India vs.m.k.gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:11. h June, 2018 + W.P. (C) 18116/2004 versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through: Ms. Rachna Gupta and Mr. S.S. Malik, Advocates ........ Petitioner M.K.GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Paranjay Chopra and Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocates + W.P. (C) 12759/2005 M.K.GUPTA versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Paranjay Chopra and Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocates CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through: Ms. Rachna Gupta and Mr. S.S. Malik, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Under challenge, in these writ petitions, preferred by the Central Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) and the workman M. K. Gupta, is an Award, dated 27th May, 2004, issued by the learned W.P. (C) 18116/2004 & W.P. (C) 12759/2005 Page 1 of 22 Industrial Tribunal in ID No.85/1993. The learned Tribunal, has vide the said award, declared the dismissal of the services of the...
Chandrawati vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPL. 1377/2018 CHANDRAWATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Joginder Tuli, Mr. Ashu Kumar Sharma, Ms. Joshini Tuli, Ms. Sabita Rana and Ms. Divya Jangid, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL1 The present petition has been filed under Section 438 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.150/2018 under Sections 304B/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Anand Parbat.2. Brief facts of the case are that, on receiving the D. D. No.43A dated 27.05.2018, ASI Chander Pal along with other police officials reached at the spot i.e. House No.52/37A, Gali No.16, Nai Basti, Anand Parbat, Delhi and found a lady namely Hemlata W/o Sandeep Kumar hanging; that during search of room a suicide note was found stating that Mein Hemlata Iss Zindagi Se P...
m.k.gupta vs.central Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:11. h June, 2018 + W.P. (C) 18116/2004 versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through: Ms. Rachna Gupta and Mr. S.S. Malik, Advocates ........ Petitioner M.K.GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Paranjay Chopra and Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocates + W.P. (C) 12759/2005 M.K.GUPTA versus ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Paranjay Chopra and Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocates CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through: Ms. Rachna Gupta and Mr. S.S. Malik, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Under challenge, in these writ petitions, preferred by the Central Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) and the workman M. K. Gupta, is an Award, dated 27th May, 2004, issued by the learned W.P. (C) 18116/2004 & W.P. (C) 12759/2005 Page 1 of 22 Industrial Tribunal in ID No.85/1993. The learned Tribunal, has vide the said award, declared the dismissal of the services of the...
d.t.c vs.kishan Lal (Mason)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:11th June 2018 + W.P. (C) 14315/2005 & CM No.10731/2005 Through: Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Advocate D.T.C ........ Petitioner versus KISHAN LAL (MASON) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narendra Gautam, Advocate with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Kishan Lal, the respondent before this Court in the present proceedings, was appointed, as a mason, with the petitioner- Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the DTC), on 22nd November, 1983, on daily wages @ 52.50 per day, payable monthly.... Petitioner and respondent are ad idem that the respondent continued to work, for the petitioner, as mason, with what the petitioner terms usual break in his service as per rules, till 3rd February, 1993, on which date his services were verbally terminated. This led the respondent to initiate an industrial dispute, which culminated in the passing, by the learne...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »