Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ruchika Singh Chhabra vs.m/s. Air France India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 04.2018 Pronounced on:30. 05.2018 LPA2372018, C.M. APPL.16802-03/2018 RUCHIKA SINGH CHHABRA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Nandita Rao and Ms. Srilina Roy, Advocates. versus M/S. AIR FRANCE INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Manish Dembla with Sh. Nachiketa Goyal, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey with Sh. Ashutosh Kaushik and Ms. Raveena Tandon, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA % MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 An unsuccessful writ petitioner appeals to this Court against an order of the learned single judge dated 30.01.2018 (in W.P(C) No.1382/2016).2. The facts of the case are that Ruchika Singh Chabra (the appellant, hereafter Appellant) joined the first respondent (hereafter the first Respondent or Air France) in the year 2001 as Commercial Assistant. She alleges to having become a victim of sexual harassment by a ...
Abuzar vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1027/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2018 ABUZAR versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Salil Bhattacharya, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Rohit Kumar, PS Jamia Nagar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3005.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.8526/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 1027/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.263/2013 under SectionsIPC and Sections of POCSO Act, Police Station Jamia Nagar.2.... Petitioner was granted regular bail by the Trial Court on BAIL APPLN. 1027/2018 Page 1 of 3 06.04.2017. Thereafter, the trial was progressing. However, on 07.07.2017, since the petitioner failed to appear, non-bailable warrants were issued.3. The petitioner, on 17.07.2017, appeared before the Trial Cou...
Gorakh Lal vs.jitender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 $~13 * % + MAC.APP. 123/2017 GORAKH LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr .M. T. Malik, Adv. versus JITENDER KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Tripathi, Adv for R-1. Mr. Manish Kapoor, Adv for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM APPL. 4600/2017 The delay of 179 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is disposed of. MAC.APP. 123/2017 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.3,27,500/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. On 17th April, 2010 at about 01:00 PM, Jitender Kumar, aged about 15 years at that time, was going on foot with his father to his school and he was hit by tractor along with water tanker bearing No.UP-83-A-7161 which MAC.APP. 123/2017 Page 1 of 3 resulted in grievous injuries to the Jitender. Jitender suffered pelvic fracture urethral injury which resulted in 100% permanent disability relating to u...
Sanofi India Ltd. And Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 05.2018 + W.P.(C) No.6096/2018 SANOFI INDIA LTD. AND ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj with Ms. Aparna versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Sinha, Advs. Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Prateek, Mr. Harshul Choudhary, Mr. Sahil Sood and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. for UOI. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM Appl. No.23598/2018 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.6096/2018 & CM Appl. No.23597/2018 2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Kirtiman Singh accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.5. I am informed that the petitioner has filed two review petitions against the impugned notifications dated 23.11.2017 and 28.12.2017. W.P.(C) No.6096/2018 Pg.1 of 2 6. It is not disputed before me by Ms. Acharya, learned ...
Deepak Jain & Ors. Vs.state and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h May, 2018 Pronounced on:30. h May, 2018 Crl.M.A. 4041/2017 in CRL.M.C. 2451/2013 HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED & ANR. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Ms. Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate. STATE & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Piyush Singhal and Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Arunav Patnaik, Mr.Shikhar Saha and Mr. Karun Pahwa, Advocates for R-2. + Crl.M.A. 4047/2017 in CRL.M.C. 2462/2013 DEEPAK JAIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Ms. Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate. STATE AND ANR. versus Through: Mr. Piyush Singhal and Mr. Ashish ........ RESPONDENTS Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Arunav Patnaik, Mr.Shikhar Saha and Mr. Karun Pahwa, Advocates for R-2. + Crl.M.A. 4045/2017 in CRL.M.C. 2525/2013 CRL.M.C. 2451/2013 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 MANDEEP SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate STATE & ORS. ...
Asianet Digital Networks Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs.star India Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:28. 05.2018 Judgment pronounced on:30. 5.2018 + W.P.(C) No.5861/2018 ASIANET SATELLITE COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Ayushi Gaur, Mr. Vinod Shankar, Mr. Atul Vinod and Ms. Amrita Cheema, Advocates. STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. P. Chidambaram and Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Kunal Tandon, Mr. Shiddharth Chopra, Mr. Shashank Shekher, Ms. Niti Jain, Mr. Prateek Jain, Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Mr. Aditya Swarup, Mr. Ambar Bhushan and Mr. Vinay Tripathi, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 5863/2018 ASIANET DIGITAL NETWORKS PVT LTD & ANR. .......Petitioners Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Ayushi Gaur, Mr. Vinod Shankar, Mr. Atul Vinod and Ms. Amrita Cheema, Advocates. versus STAR INDIA PVT LTD & ANR ..........Respondents Through: Mr. P. Chidambaram and Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advoca...
Sajida Khatun & Ors vs.ram Niwas & Ors (M/S New India Assurnace Co Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ * % + MAC.APP. 297/2018 SAJIDA KHATUN & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. R.S. Roy, Advocate versus RAM NIWAS & ORS (M/S NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Vandana Surana, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellants have challenged the award of Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.7,24,000/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants are seeking enhancement of compensation amount.2. The accident dated 12th July 2008 resulted in death of Md. Mobin. The deceased was aged about 44 years and survived by his widow, three sons and one daughter who claimed compensation. The deceased was self- employed doing business of selling fruits and vegetables. According to the claimants, the deceased was earning Rs.9,000/- per month.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as per minimum wages of Rs.3,633/- per month, added 25% towards...
State (Gnct of Delhi) vs.vijeta @ Varsha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:30. h May, 2018 24th March, 2018 + CRL.A. 388/2016 & CRL.M.(Bail) 500/2018 MAHENDRA @ MANISH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Ms. Nikita Sharma, Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Ms. Nutan Kumari, Mr. Kunal Yadav and Ms. Priya Yadav, Advs. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with SI Manish Yadav, P.S. Vasant Kunj (North). Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Mr. R.N.Mishra and Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advs. for respondent. Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Mr.R.N.Mishra and Ms. ..... Appellant + CRL.A. 1010/2017 M (name withheld) Shruti Sharma, Advs. VIJETA @ VARSHA @ LALI Through: Mr.Ajit Kumar, Ms.Nikita Sharma, Mr.Ashwani Kumar and Ms.Nutan Kumari, Advs.for R-1. Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State/R SI Manish Yadav, P.S. Vasant Kunj (North). ........ RESPONDENTS Versus Crl. A. Nos. 388/2016, 1010/2017 & 1011/2017 Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 1011/2017...
M/S Alpha Omega Resoulution Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.the Manager Icici B ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.448/2018 + % M/S ALPHA OMEGA RESOULUTION CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. 30th May, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans, Mr. Vishal Soni and Ms. Aarti Manchanda, Advocates. versus THE MANAGER ICICI BANK LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.22395/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.22396/2018 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in this application, the delay of 45 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.448/2018 Page 1 of 7 RFA No.448/2018 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 28.11.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the...
State Trading Corporation of India vs.helm Dungemittel Gmbh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:25. 04. 2018 Judgment Pronounced on:30. 05.2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 76/2016 STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate (ASG) with Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath, Ms.Sumati Anand, Mr.Saurabh Kumar Tuteja and Mr.Onkar Nath Advocates. versus HELM DUNGEMITTEL GMBH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Tiwari, Through: Mr.Rahul P. Dave, Mr.Amit Dhingra, Mr.Bhaskar Mr.Rohit Mahajan and Mr.Shivam Kumar Raheja, Advocates for respondent no.1. Mr.Pradeep Dewan, Senior Advocate with Ms.Anupam Dhingra, Advocate for respondent no.2/Canara Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. This is an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13 of the Commercial FAO (OS) (COMM) No.76/2016 Page 1 of 23 Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 read with Sect...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »