Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4329/2018 & CM No.16820-16821/2018 DEEPAK KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Kumar and Mr.Vishal Patel, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ranjeet Kumar and Ms. Madhulika Agarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned judgment dated 13th November, 2017 whereby the learned District Judge dismissed the petitioners appeal against the eviction order passed by the Estate Officer.2. On 26th April, 2014, the petitioner was transferred from Delhi to Muzaffar Nagar. The petitioner retained the official quarter on the ground of sickness of his wife and made a request for extension of the retention period on 20th June, 2014 and 17th September, 2014.3. On 22nd September, 2014, the petitioner was transferred back to Delhi whereupon the petitioner requested for ...
Deepak Arora and Ors. Vs.government of National Capital Territory of D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5072/2018, CM APPL195862018 (stay) DEEPAK ARORA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Ms. Prema versus Priyadarshini, Ms. Raunika Johar & Mr. Ashish Shaw, Advocates. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for R-1 & R-4. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hem Kumar & Ms. Simmee Kumari, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Raman Bhasin, E.E., PWD. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Counter affidavits have been filed by PWD as also by the LAC. However, ORDER3005.2018 % 1. no counter affidavit has been filed by the DDA.2. By the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to the land of the petitioners com...
Poonam Sharma & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.469/2018 + % POONAM SHARMA & ORS. 30th May, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amiet Andley, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.23655/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.23656/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 47 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.23657/2018 (exemption from filing TCR) 3. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.469/2018 Page 1 of 6 RFA No.469/2018 4. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 8....
Kalika & Anr vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 FAO4622011 KALIKA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Rohit Dutta, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Ms. Momota Bhattacharya, Ms. Priyata Chakraborty, Advs. for railways. ..... Appellants + FAO4632011 KALIKA & ANR Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Rohit Dutta, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Ms. Momota Bhattacharya, Ms. Priyata Chakraborty, Advs. for railways. ..... Appellants + FAO4642011 KALIKA & ANR Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Rohit Dutta, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Ms. Momota Bhattacharya, Ms. Priyata Chakraborty, Advs. for railways. FAO4622011, 463-2011, 464-2011, 465-2011, 488-2011 Page 1 of 5 + FAO4652011 KALIKA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Responden...
Suhail & Ors vs.vijay Singh & Ors (Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 $~23 & 24 * % + MAC.APP. 199/2018 23 SUHAIL & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Munish Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus VIJAY SINGH & ORS (RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Throu gh: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Sirnivasan, Advs. for R3. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 200/2018 24 SUHAIL & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Munish Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus VIJAY SINGH & ORS ( RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ) Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Sirnivasan, Advs. for R3. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the awards of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,95,000/- has been awarded in respect of death of Aslam (the father of the appellants) and Rs.11,95,000/- has been awarded in respect of death of Kamarjahan (the mother of the appellants). MAC.APP.199/2018 & 200/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The accident dated 05th July, 2014 resulted in the...
Mohammed Rais vs.m/s Abhi Packaging
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 + RFA4102016 MOHAMMED RAIS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqqui, Mr. Mohammad Usman Siddiqui, Ms. Aisha Siddiqui and Ms. Sakeena Quidwai, Advocates. (M:9811391014) versus M/S ABHI PACKAGING ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh K. Shukla and Mr. Advocates. Yadav, Amlesh (M:9899454835) Mr. N. L. Sahai, Advocate (M:9899986943) for Applicant Ms. Zeenat Rais. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. A suit for recovery of Rs.11,21,975/- was filed by M/s. Abhi Packaging (Respondent/Plaintiff) against M/s. Zen International (Appellant/Defendant). The brief case of the Plaintiff is that it used to supply the packaging material to the Defendant and regular accounts were being maintained to show the transactions between the Plaintiff and the Defendant. For the financial year 2010-11, an amount of Rs.7,28,555/- was outstanding but the Defendant failed to make the payment. The total ...
Rameshwar Gopal vs.anil Atrey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAMESHWAR GOPAL RFA No.467/2018 30th May, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate with Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate. versus ANIL ATREY CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.23588/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.23598/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.467/2018 and C.M. No.23587/2018(stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA No.467/2018 Page 1 of 7 filed by the respondent/plaintiff for specific performance pertaining to property bearing nos.75 to 90 built on a plot no.WZ-296, Block G, forming part of Khasra No.835, situated at Hari Nagar, G Block, Jai...
Sandisk Corporation vs.j K Electronics & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ * + #25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM)117/2017 SANDISK CORPORATION ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Shwetashree Majumder with Ms. Pritika Kohli, Advocates versus J K ELECTRONICS & ORS ..... Defendants Through None % Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade dress, copyright, passing off, rendition of account of profits, damages, delivery up, etc. against the defendants. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"23. It is, therefore, prayed that the following reliefs may be granted to the Plaintiffs: a) An order for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, proprietors, servants, agents and all others in active concert or participation with them from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in packaging and/or products identical or that...
Mahendra @ Manish vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on:30. h May, 2018 24th March, 2018 + CRL.A. 388/2016 & CRL.M.(Bail) 500/2018 MAHENDRA @ MANISH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Ms. Nikita Sharma, Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Ms. Nutan Kumari, Mr. Kunal Yadav and Ms. Priya Yadav, Advs. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with SI Manish Yadav, P.S. Vasant Kunj (North). Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Mr. R.N.Mishra and Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advs. for respondent. Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Mr.R.N.Mishra and Ms. ..... Appellant + CRL.A. 1010/2017 M (name withheld) Shruti Sharma, Advs. VIJETA @ VARSHA @ LALI Through: Mr.Ajit Kumar, Ms.Nikita Sharma, Mr.Ashwani Kumar and Ms.Nutan Kumari, Advs.for R-1. Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for the State/R SI Manish Yadav, P.S. Vasant Kunj (North). ........ RESPONDENTS Versus Crl. A. Nos. 388/2016, 1010/2017 & 1011/2017 Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 1011/2017...
Sh. d.v. Anand vs.hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 584/2016 SH. D.V. ANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr.Varun Kapur, Advocate versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr Naveen Kumar Raheja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3005.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 14.12.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by the sole arbitrator, namely, Sh Sanjay Kumar (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to HP Gas (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) Dealership (Domestic & Commercial) Agreement dated 31.10.2013 (hereafter the Agreement).2. The principal dispute between the parties relates to the penalty O.M.P....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »