Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Ambavat & Ors. Vs.the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, New Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6165/2018 & CM Nos. 23838-39/2018 1. SANJAY AMBAVAT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Nusrat Hossain and Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates Versus THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI, NEW DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of tentative seniority list of Senior Personal Assistants as on 20th March, 2018 prepared under Catch up Rule/Policy (Annexure P-29) is sought in this petition on various grounds. However, no proper objections to this tentative seniority list (Annexure P-29) have been filed by petitioners.2.... Petitioners counsel submits that the tentative seniority list has been circulated in March, 2018 and objections thereto have to be yet filed.3. It is submitted that the objections to the tentative seniority list (Annexure P-29) would be filed w...
Rahul Mehra vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2018 W.P. (C) 1489/2013 & CM No.2805/2013 RAHUL MEHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra,... Petitioner in person. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Hemant Phalpher, Adv. for R-4. Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan with Mr. Aditya Garg and Ms. Himani Kaushik, Advs. for R-6. Mr. Premtosh Mishra with Ms. Yojna Goyal and Ms. Saloni Agarwal, Advs. for R-8. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) In view of order dated 10.08.2017 passed in CM No.10461/2017 in W.P. (C) No.195/2010, no further orders are required in this petition. The petition is disposed-off in terms of the above. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J MAY31 2018 WP(C) 1489-13 Page 1 of 1...
Gautam Budha University vs.m/s Efficient Book Distributors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2018 + RFA10212016 & CM APPL. 47581/2016 GAUTAM BUDHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vaibhav Chaudhary, Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocates along with Mr. P.S. Chaudhary, AR, Mr. Pappan Babu, AR. M/S EFFICIENT BOOK DISTRIBUTORS versus Through: Mr. Narender Vashista, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal against the impugned judgment/order dated 24th August, 2016 by which the delay in filing of memo of appearance by the Appellant/Defendant Gautam Budha University (hereinafter, Defendant University) was not condoned leading to the suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff), filed under Order 37 CPC, being decreed in the following terms: 12. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed for recovery of Rs.36,93,531/- as claimed by the plaintiff and pendentlite and future interest @ 9% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till...
Promila Devi & Anr. Vs.govt.of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6185/2018 & CM APPL. Nos. 23892-23893/2018 PROMILA DEVI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivek B Saharya, Advocate Versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief sought in this petition, several Representations were made by petitioners to the respondents. According to petitioners counsel, there is no response. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with permission to petitioners to make a fresh and concise Representation within a period of one week. If any such Representation is received by the second respondent, then said Representation be decided by way of a speaking order within a period of six weeks and the fate of the Representation be made known to petitioners within two weeks ...
Emaar Mgf Land Ltd vs.sunita
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 250/2018, I.A. 7782-7783/2018 EMAAR MGF LAND LTD ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Sanam SUNITA Tripathi and Mr. Arjun Jain, Advs. versus Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA (ORAL) % ORDER3105.2018 I.A. 7782/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (COMM) 250/2018 & I.A.7783/2018( STAY) 1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 02nd April, 2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to Buyers Agreement dated 08th May, 2012.2. The abovementioned Agreement had been executed between the parties whereunder the respondent had sought allotment of Unit No.EFS-B- C-SF-060A, Second Floor, Coral Building, Emerald Hills, Gurgaon, Haryana. The re...
Dr Shelly Bhutani vs.maharaja Agrasain Educaional Society & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * DR SHELLY BHUTANI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1984/2018 & CMs 8175/2018, 12666/2018 & 6586/2018 Through: Mr. Khagesh B Jha, Advocate .....Petitioner MAHARAJA AGRASAIN EDUCAIONAL SOCIETY & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Gupta, Ms. Tripti Gupta, Ms. Ayushi Dhingra, Ms. Sanjana Gupta and Ms. Leena Saxena, Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Mr. Shashwat Parihar, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Impugned Communication of 20th February, 2018 withdraws the resolution vide which petitioner was promoted to the post of Vice Principal. The challenge to impugned Communication (Annexure A) is on the ground that no approval from the Director of Education, Govt. of NCT has been taken. While entertaining this writ petition, it is noted in the order of 1st March, 2018 that the net effect of impugned Communication is that petitioner has been reduced to the rank ...
Mohd. Suleman and Ors. Vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~6, 7, 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4502/2018 Date of Order:31. t May, 2018 MOHD. LUKMAN AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, Standing ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for respondent no.1. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. + W.P.(C) 4504/2018 MOHD. SULEMAN AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Shekhar Vyas, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS respondent no.1. Ms. Shefali Vohra, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. SI Kamaljeet Singh, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + W.P.(C) 4514/2018 MADAN GOPAL ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) Nos.4502/2018 etc. Page 1 of 5 Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Tushar Sannu, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENT...
L&t Sucg Jv Cc27 Delhi vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~12 * + Date of decision:31. t May, 2018 versus with Ms. Megha Mehta Agarwal, Ms. Akanshi Lodhi and Mr. Samith S., Advocates. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 120/2018 L&T SUCG JV CC27 DELHI DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): CM APPL. 24162-24163/2018 (exemption) Through: None. Respondent Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 120/2018 1. This intra-Court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(A&C Act for short) impugns judgment dated 20th March, 2018 and order dated 1st May, 2018, passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP(COMM) No.121 of 2018 and I.A. No.5742/2018 in OMP(COMM) No.121 of 2018, respectively.2. Judgment dated 20th March, 2018 dismisses the application filed by the appellant under Section 34 of...
Antrix Corporation Ltd. Vs.devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 12.2017 Pronounced on :30. 05.2017 FAO(OS)(COMM) 67/2017, C.M. APPL.11214 & 17730/2017 ANTRIX CORPORATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Arjun Krishnan, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Sh. Ankur Singh, Sh. Saket Sikri and Sh. Sahil Jagotra, Advocates. versus DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate, Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate, Sh. Ciccu Mukhopadhyay, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Omar Ahmad, Sh. Saurabh Seth, Sh. Vikram Shah and Sh. Sumer Dev Seth, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA % MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT Facts 1. This appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereafter CC Act) impugns the decision of a Learned Single Judge of this Court dated 28.02.2017 in OMP (I) 558 /2015.2. The facts are that on 28.01.200...
Ht Media Limited & Anr vs.mr. Satish Kumar K. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 372/2018 HT MEDIA LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Dhavish Chitkara, Advocate. versus MR. SATISH KUMAR K. & ANR ..... Defendants None Through % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:30. h May, 2018 MANMOHAN, J (Oral): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, unfair business practice, rendition of accounts, damages, etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"a) Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their Directors, principal Officers, Partners, Proprietors, financers, Domain keepers, Publishers, editors, employees, reporters, servants, agents and/or any one claiming under them from, in any manner whatsoever, using the mark FRESHERSHINE or any deceptive variant thereof which is identical and/or similar trademark SHINE and SHINE.COM, in respect of their online job portal services...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »