Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxmi Dass vs.p P Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 96/2018, Cav.553/2018 & CM Nos. 24052- % LAXMI DASS P P SINGH & ORS240542018 Date of decision :31. t May, 2018 Through : Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq and Mr. Nimesh Chib, Advs. ..... Appellant versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. P. Chandra Shekhar and Mr. Prashant Shekhar, Advs. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Cav.553/2018 The caveators have been represented and the caveat shall stand discharged. FAO(OS) 96/2018 & CM Nos. 24052-24054/2018 1. By this appeal, the appellant Laxmi Dass (the objector in Test Case No.95/2012) assails an order dated 27th April, 2018 passed on IA No.2665/2015, being an application under Section 151 of the CPC FAO(OS)No.96/2018 Page 1 of 4 which was filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein (the petitioners in Test Case No.95/2012) seeking the following directions : (i) the deceased to deposit the rent in ...
Kumho Petrochemical Co. Limited vs.the Designated Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 4810/2014 FORECH INDIA LTD. versus Judgment reserved on:22. 03.2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2018 ........ Petitioner THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS W.P. (C) 4886/2014 KUMHO PETROCHEMICAL CO. LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 1749/2017, CM APPL.7796/2017 KUMHO PETROCHEMICAL CO. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates appeared in this case: For the petitioners: Mr. S. Seetharaman with Mr. Ankur Sharma and Mr. Dharpan For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Reena Khair, Mr. Bhuyan, Advocates. Rajesh Sharma, Ms. Rita Jha and Ms. Shreya Dahiya. Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advocate in W.P. (C) 4810 & 4886/2014. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for respondents in W.P.(C) 1749/2017. WP(C) Nos. 4810/2014...
Madan Gopal vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~6, 7, 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4502/2018 Date of Order:31. t May, 2018 MOHD. LUKMAN AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, Standing ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel for respondent no.1. Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. + W.P.(C) 4504/2018 MOHD. SULEMAN AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Shekhar Vyas, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS respondent no.1. Ms. Shefali Vohra, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. SI Kamaljeet Singh, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + W.P.(C) 4514/2018 MADAN GOPAL ........ Petitioner W.P. (C) Nos.4502/2018 etc. Page 1 of 5 Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Through Mr.Tushar Sannu, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENT...
D L Pahuja vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6162/2018 Date of Order: May 31, 2018 1. D L PAHUJA GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: Mr. Ravi Varma, Advocate versus .....Respondents .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for R-1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Vide order of 22nd December, 2017, second respondent was directed to consider the Representation in light of recommendation of 14th November, 2017. Pursuant to order of 22nd December, 2017 (Annexure P- 14), impugned order of 19th March, 2018 (Annexure P-16) has been passed by respondents granting Assured Career Progression (hereinafter to be referred to as ACP) benefit to petitioner.2. Now, the grievance of petitioner is that third MACP benefit has not been granted despite recommendations of 14th November, 2017 (Annexure P-13).3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the Representation (Annexure P-15), benefit of third MA...
M/S Eternity Footwear Ltd (Formerly Known as Diamond Product Ltd) vs.m ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2018 + FAO(OS) 95/2018 & CM No.24021/2018 M/S ETERNITY FOOTWEAR LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ..... Appellant DIAMOND PRODUCT LTD) Through: Mr. Vineet Kumar and Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advs. versus M/S THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Consequent to hearing arguments, we had, on 31st May, 2018, dismissed this appeal, for reasons to follow thereafter. This judgment records the reasons for our decision.2. Though there is no real dispute on facts in the present case, a bare glance, thereat, is necessary.3. The appellant was engaged in the manufacture of footwear, and had two manufacturing units, located at A-9, Mayapuri, Industrial FAO(OS) 95/2018 Page 1 of 17 Area, Phase-II, New Delhi and Himachal Pradesh. In respect of the premises at Kala-Amb, the appellant purchased a Standard Fire & Spe...
Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Through: Its Authoriz ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~13 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31st May, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 220/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (THROUGH: ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. VENKATESH GOMATAM) & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms.Ananya Aggarwal, Ms.Shruti Sabharwal, Ms.Surbhi Lal, Advs. versus DUET INDIA HOTELS (CHENNAI OMR) PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay, Mr.N.K.Sharma, Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. ..... Respondent (14) O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 221/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms.Ananya Aggarwal, Ms.Shruti Sabharwal, Ms.Surbhi Lal, Advs. versus DUET INDIA HOTELS (CHENNAI) PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay, Mr.N.K.Sharma, Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. ..... Respondent (15) O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 222/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms....
Farha Hussain vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h May, 2018 Decided on:31. t May, 2018 W.P. (CRL) 1338/2018 FARHA HUSSAIN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Anjali J.Manish and Mr. Sagar Rohatgi, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Gigi. C George and Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Advocates for R-1 & R-2. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, SSC & Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the wife of Mr. Sharafat Hussain (hereafter the Detenue) seeking the quashing of a detention order No.F. No.PD/12002/01/2017-COFEPOSA dated 2nd January 2018, issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India, COFEPOSA Unit, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau in the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smug...
Vedanta Limited & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:17. 01.2018 Judgment pronounced on:31. 05.2018 * + W.P.(C) No.11599/2015 VEDANTA LIMITED & ORS. ..Petitioners Through: Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv., Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Mr. Anish Kapur, Mr. Dhritiman Roy and Mr. Chaitanya Kaushik, Advs Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Waiz Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Saeed Qadri, Advs. Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha and Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Preface:1. The extension of tenure of Production Sharing Contract dated 15.5.1995 (hereafter referred to as "PSC") qua the Rajasthan Block RJ-ON- 9(hereafter referred to as "Rajasthan Block") for a period of 10 years beyond its current term is at the heart of the matter. 1.1 The present tenure of the PSC comes to an end on 14.5.2020. The petitioners seek the extension of the tenure of the PSC for a further period W.P....
Forech India Ltd. Vs.the Designated Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 4810/2014 FORECH INDIA LTD. versus Judgment reserved on:22. 03.2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2018 ........ Petitioner THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS W.P. (C) 4886/2014 KUMHO PETROCHEMICAL CO. LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 1749/2017, CM APPL.7796/2017 KUMHO PETROCHEMICAL CO. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates appeared in this case: For the petitioners: Mr. S. Seetharaman with Mr. Ankur Sharma and Mr. Dharpan For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Reena Khair, Mr. Bhuyan, Advocates. Rajesh Sharma, Ms. Rita Jha and Ms. Shreya Dahiya. Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advocate in W.P. (C) 4810 & 4886/2014. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for respondents in W.P.(C) 1749/2017. WP(C) Nos. 4810/2014...
Sanjay Ambavat & Ors. Vs.the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, New Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6165/2018 & CM Nos. 23838-39/2018 1. SANJAY AMBAVAT & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Nusrat Hossain and Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates Versus THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI, NEW DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of tentative seniority list of Senior Personal Assistants as on 20th March, 2018 prepared under Catch up Rule/Policy (Annexure P-29) is sought in this petition on various grounds. However, no proper objections to this tentative seniority list (Annexure P-29) have been filed by petitioners.2.... Petitioners counsel submits that the tentative seniority list has been circulated in March, 2018 and objections thereto have to be yet filed.3. It is submitted that the objections to the tentative seniority list (Annexure P-29) would be filed w...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »