Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharam Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~16 * + W.P.(C) 6277/2018 & CM No.24214/2018 DHARAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kartar Singh, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, ASC for R-1 and 5. Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2, 3 and 4. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER3105.2018 The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this % 1. Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying inter alia for quashing the order dated 03.11.2017, passed in Original Application No.357/2015 and the order dated 19.02.2018, passed in Review Application No.20/2018 for direction to the respondents to release his salary/back wages w.e.f. 27.01.2014 or from 17.07.2014, the date of passing of the order in Original Application No.2132/2014 wherein the Tribunal had directed the respondents to take a decision on his representation. W.P.(C) 6277/2018 Page 1 of 5 2....
M/S. Rama Service Station vs.gurdayal Singh Verma & Oprs. (Bajaj Allia ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + MAC APP1192015 & CM No.2437/2015 M/S. RAMA SERVICE STATION ....Appellant Through: Mr. Sashil Mongia, Advocate Versus GURDAYAL SINGH VERMA & OPRS. (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R AND MAC APP. No.314/2015 M/S.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INS.CO.LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate Versus M/S. RAMA SERVICE STATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sashi Mongia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) At the outset, it is pointed out by learned counsel for the parties that this appeal has no relation with MAC.APP. No.1003/2016 and in fact, this appeal has to be heard along with MAC APP. No.314/2015. MAC APP. 119/2015 & 314/2015 Page 1 of 3 In view of the aforesaid, last order of 21st February, 2017 is clarified to the extent that this appeal has to be heard along with the Main Appeal being cross-appeal No.314/2015. A...
Chandra Gupt vs.bharat Gupt & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2018 CS(OS) No.272/2018 CHANDRA GUPT .... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Anju Lal & Ms. Shalu Lal, Advs. Versus BHARAT GUPT & ANR. Through: None. ...Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted the present suit for recovery of possession of ground floor portion shown in red colour in the site plan filed by the plaintiff and the entire first floor including the portion shown in red colour in the site plan and the second floor of property No.J-53, Ashok Vihar, Phase- I, Delhi-110052 along with mesne profits. A perusal of the site plan filed along with the plaint shows only one bed room with WC and bath on the ground floor and one bedroom with WC and bath on the first floor of the property shown in red colour.2. The plaintiff, in the plaint has pleaded (i) that the plaintiff is the sole and absolute owner of the property No.J-53, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I, ad- measuring 300 sq. yds., by ...
Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.duet India H ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31st May, 2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 222/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms.Ananya Aggarwal, Ms.Shruti Sabharwal, Ms.Surbhi Lal, Advs. versus DUET INDIA HOTELS (AHMEDABAD) PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay, Mr.N.K.Sharma, Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the detailed order passed by this Court today in OMP(I)(Comm.) No.220/2018 and other connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed.2. A copy of the aforesaid order in OMP(I)(Comm.) No.220/2018 is placed below. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MAY31 2018 RN $~13 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31st May, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 220/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (THROUGH: ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATOR...
Syed Shahid Yousuf vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May 2018 Decided on:31. t May 2018 + CRL.A.426/2018 & CRL.M.A.7469/2018 SYED SHAHID YOUSUF .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ....Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate, ASG with Mr. Amit Sharma, SPP, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Mr. Som Prakash, Mr. Viplav Chaudhary, Mr. Neel Kamal PP, Ms. Kanchan, PP and Mr. Ajeet Singh Salaria, Advocates for NIA. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Appellant, who was arrested by the National Investigating Agency (NIA) in FIR No.RC-06/2011/NIA/DLI on 24th October 2017, and who continues to remain in judicial custody as of date, challenges two orders passed by the Special Court, NIA, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi dated 5th February 2018 and 7th March 2018. The contention of the Appellant is that he is entitled to statutory bail under Section 167(2) Cr PC and that the Special Cour...
Reema Salkan vs.sumer Singh Salkan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 204/2015 & CRL.M.A.4961/2015, 4963/2015, 5608/2015, 9820/2015, 8145/2016, 12393/2016 Reserved on: April 27, 2018 Date of decision: May 31, 2018 ........ Petitioner REEMA SALKAN Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Adv. versus SUMER SINGH SALKAN ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia, Ms. Arpita Rai, and Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I. S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant revision petition is preferred by the petitioner- Reema Salkan under SectionsCr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the impugned order dated 28.01.2015 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Courts North, Rohini, Delhi in Petition No.3Unique Case I.D. No.02404R101992003 titled as Reema Salkan vs. Sumer Singh Salkan. CRL.REV.P. 204/2015 Page 1 of 37 2. It is alleged in the maintenance petition dated 16.07.2002 that the petitioner got married with respondent no.1 as per...
Mishri Devi and Anr. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:31. t May, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6241/2018 MISHRI DEVI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shyam S. Sharma, Ms.Aastha Jain, Mr.Nirbhay Sharma, Mr.Pranav Rishi, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, Standing Counsel with Mr.Arjun Malik, ASC for NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.24094/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 6241/2018 and CM No.24093/2018 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.2. Mr. J.P. Sengh, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed an appeal against the eviction order passed by the Estate Officer which is listed for hearing before the District Judge on 10th September, 2018. It is further submitted that the respondents forcibly took the possession of the subject premises, namely, shop bear...
Smt. Anita vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6180/2018 Date of Order: May 31, 2018 1. SMT. ANITA Through: Ms. Archana Sharma and Mr. Divakar Upadhyay, Advocates .....Petitioner Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) To seek the relief as sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-2) was made by petitioner on 11th April, 2018 to respondents. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to the Representation (Annexure P-2).2. Despite service of advance notice, there is no Representation on behalf of respondent-School.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to second respondent to effectively consider petitioners Representation (Annexure P-2) within a period of eight weeks and the fate of the Representation be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter...
Sunder Paswan & Ors vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May 2018 Decided on:31. t May 2018 + SUNDER PASWAN & ORS CRL.A. 1043/2013 .....Appellants Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu Bakshi Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra and Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State + LAL BABU @ SANJAY .....Appellant CRL.A. 1328/2014 Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu Bakshi Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra and Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the common impugned judgment dated 3rd April 2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (North- Crl. A.Nos.1043/2013 & 1328/2014 Page 1 of 28 West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.38/2011 arising out of FIR No.115/2011 registered at PS Shalimar Bagh convicting the three Appell...
Laxmi Dass vs.p P Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 96/2018, Cav.553/2018 & CM Nos. 24052- % LAXMI DASS P P SINGH & ORS240542018 Date of decision :31. t May, 2018 Through : Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq and Mr. Nimesh Chib, Advs. ..... Appellant versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. P. Chandra Shekhar and Mr. Prashant Shekhar, Advs. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Cav.553/2018 The caveators have been represented and the caveat shall stand discharged. FAO(OS) 96/2018 & CM Nos. 24052-24054/2018 1. By this appeal, the appellant Laxmi Dass (the objector in Test Case No.95/2012) assails an order dated 27th April, 2018 passed on IA No.2665/2015, being an application under Section 151 of the CPC FAO(OS)No.96/2018 Page 1 of 4 which was filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein (the petitioners in Test Case No.95/2012) seeking the following directions : (i) the deceased to deposit the rent in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »