Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms. Veerpal Kaur vs.state Bank of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 29, 2018 W.P.(C) 6030/2018 MS. VEERPAL KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Shukla and Mr. Mukul versus Gautam, Advocates STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.L. Gupta and Mr. Atul Kumar Jha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Impugned order of 10th April, 2018 (Annexure P-7) terminates service of petitioner on account of her not qualifying the second confirmation test.... Petitioners probation was extended till 1st March, 2018 to enable her to clear the confirmation test.2. According to petitioners counsel, due to medical problems, petitioner could not effectively perform in the second confirmation test and in light of the State Bank of Hyderabad (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979, another chance to clear confirmation test ought to be given to petitioner. However, in this regard, no representation has been made to respondents by petitioner.3. In the facts and cir...
Fernas Construction India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.artson Engineering Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 233/2018 & IA Nos. 7361/2018, 7362/2018 & 7365/2018 FERNAS CONSTRUCTION INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: Counsel ........ Petitioner for the petitioner (appearance not given). versus ARTSON ENGINEERING LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sameer Parekh, Mr D. P. Mohanty and Ms Pavitra Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2905.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of 1. the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 19.12.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by a Sole Arbitrator, Justice V.K. Bali, Retired (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The present petition was filed on 17.04.2018, which was beyond the period as specified under Section 34(3) of the Act. However, it was filed within a period of thirty days (in fact, on the 30th day) after expiry of the period of th...
Axiscades Aerospace and Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Axis ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 03.2018 Pronounced on:29. 05.2018 + W.P.(C) 856/2017, C.M. APPL.3950/2017 AXISCADES AEROSPACE AND TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS AXIS AEROSPACE & TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Sh. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Anirban Bhattacharya, Sh. Bharat Chugh and Sh. Vibhor Jain, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC and Sh. Prateek Dhanda, Sh. Waize Ali Noor and Sh. Saeed Qadri, Advocate, for UOI. Sh. Arvind. K. Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kabeer Shrivastav, Sh. Mikhil Sharda, Sh. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu and Sh. Avneesh Arputham, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1 The writ petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the withdrawal of a Request of Proposal (hereinafter refer...
Shakti Jan Sudhar Samiti and Ors. Vs.govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 5909/2018 & CM APPL. 23027-23028/2018 SHAKTI JAN SUDHAR SAMITI AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Date of Decision:29. 05.2018 Through: Mr. Subodh K. Pathak with Ms. Pranita Shekhar, Advs. versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Premsagar Pal for Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC for R-1 & 2. Mr. Rajeev Sharma with Ms. Radhalakshmi R., Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(Oral) 1. This writ petition challenges the tender conditions issued by the respondent Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB). The Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) in this case is with respect to elicited bids for free user charge basis tenders from eligible parties, for the purpose of toilet cleaning in the Jan Suvidha complexes, in the city of Delhi. The petitioner objects to some of the eligibility conditions, especially those, which relate to similar works and m...
Amit Mann @ Bhola vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2799/2018 Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2018 AMIT MANN@ BHOLA STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr Vikram Saini Mr. Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for the State SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Vasant Kunj. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2905.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner, by this petition, seeks a direction to the Trial Court to conduct the trial expeditiously on a day-to-day basis.2.... Petitioner has been in custody since 01.04.2013. The trial of the petitioner was nearly over when one of the co-accused was apprehended and thereafter said co-accused is facing trial and sought cross-examination of the witnesses already examined. CRL.M.C. 2799/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. It is submitted by the learned APP that out of 15 witnesses, four have already been cross examined...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.rajeev Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h May, 2018 $~16 & 17 * % + MAC.APP. 825/2017 & CM No.33438/2017 RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD versus Through Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ramraghvendra Kumar, Avocate Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advocate as amicus curiae. ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ramraghvendra Kumar, Avocate RAJEEV KUMAR + MAC.APP. 1032/2017 versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS Through Ms.Prerna Mehta, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advocate as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.29,70,377/- along with interest @ 9% per annum has been awarded to Rajeev Kumar. MAC. APP. 825/2017, 1032/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. On 31st October, 2012 at about 11.30 PM, Rajeev Kumar was going on his motor cycle bearing No.DL-8S-NE-0448 when he was hit by a truck bearing no.H...
Aswini Kumar Goswami & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5929/2018 & CM231512018 Date of Order: May 29, 2018 1. ASWINI KUMAR GOSWAMI & ORS Through: Mr. Manoj Gupta, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shalini Nair, Ms. Anjana Gosain and Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Advocates for respondent No.1 Ms. Ratna D. Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates for respondents No.2, 4 to 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners claim that they were given fixed term contract engagement as Assistant Controllers by third respondent-Air India Air Transport Services Limited (hereafter referred to as AIATSL) for a period of three years. Although the Fixed Term Contract Engagement Agreement (Annexure P-2 colly.) does not contain any clause for renewal, but petitioners counsel asserts that petitioners aforesaid Contract has been renewed from time to time and the last renewal was on 15th March, 2018 for a period of three mo...
Shahwaiz Ahmed & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
# 21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2018 LPA3122018 SHAHWAIZ AHMED & ANR ..... Appellants versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the... RESPONDENTS :Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh and Mr. Ravish Singh, Advocates :Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Tania Ahlawat and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM APPL.23218/2018 (Exemption) Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of accordingly. LPA3122018 Page 1 of 14 CM APPL.23217/2018 (Condonation of Delay) The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 instituted on behalf of the applicants/appellants seeks condonation of 14 days delay in filing the accompanying appeal....
Boris Sobotic Mikolic vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 577/2018 & CRL.M.A. 3688/2018 BORIS SOBOTIC MIKOLIC ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Jha Manish and Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Ms. Titasha Banerjee, Mr. Akshaya Agarwal & Mr. Sanjay Pal, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Senior Standing Counsel for DRI. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % JUDGMENT2905.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is a petition by a Slovenian national seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a detention order dated 17th October 2017 issued by the Joint Secretariat of the Government of India, COFEPOSA Unit, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. The said detention order No.F.No.PD-12001/04/2017-COFEPOSA was issued under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 [COFEPOSA ...
Naresh Kumar vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 1099/2018 NARESH KUMAR versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Anushree Kapadia, Advocate. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. Mehmood Pracha with Mr. R.H.A. Sikander and Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advocates for the complainant. Inspector Mukesh Kumar, Inspector Bhushan Azad and Inspector K.G. Tyagi. JUDGMENT2905.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 1099/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 787/2018 (for interim bail) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.14/2018 under Sections 387/323/454/427/354D/506/509/120B/34/365 IPC, Police BAIL APPLN. 1099/2018 Page 1 of 4 Station Special Cell (SB).2. The petitioner is a Sub Inspector. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner in c...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »