Delhi Court May 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Surinder Kumar Beri & Anr. Vs.deepak Beri & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~J- * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:31. 05.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 382/2016 SURINDER KUMAR BERI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Prag P.Tripathi, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Priya Kumar, Mr.Adhish Srivastava and Mr.Sujit Kr.Singh, Advs. Versus DEEPAK BERI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Saurabh Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Akshey Makhija, Mr. Seth, Ms.Sumeera Seth, Ms.Seerat Deep Singh and Ms. Kriti, Advs for R-1. Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.C.D.Mulherkar and Ms.Anushka, Advocates for R-2. O.M.P. (COMM.) 396/2016 ATUL BERI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.C.D.Mulherkar and Ms.Anushka, Advocates. versus DEEPAK BERI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Akshey Makhija, Mr. Seth, Saurabh O.M.P.(COMM) 382/2016 & Anr. Page 1 of 23 Ms.Sumeera Seth, Ms.Seerat Deep Singh and Ms. Kriti, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. These are two separate objecti...
The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii vs.m/s Sudev Industries Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.805/2005 Reserved on :1. t February, 2018 Date of decision :31. t May, 2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Lakshmi Gurung & Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S SUDEV INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Somil Agarwal, Ms. Monika Ghai & Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), relates to Assessment Year 1995-96 and arises from order dated 30th March, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in the case of M/s Sudev Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as, the respondent-assessee).2. The appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 4th August, 2006 on the following substantial question of law:-"ITA No.805 /2005 Page 1 of 29 ...
Jimmeesh James and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6256/23018 & CM No.24136/2018 JIMMEESH JAMES AND ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Gupta, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dhingra, Ms. Bhavna Dhami and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates For R-2 and 4 to 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Learned counsel for petitioners seeks parity with Aswini Kumar Goswami & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. in WP (C) No.5929/2018 which has been disposed of vide order of 29th May, 2018 with permission to petitioners of the said case, to make individual applications seeking transfer of contract from AIATSL to Air India within a period of two weeks. In view of the order of 29th May, 2018 in Aswini Kumar Goswami & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., this petition and the application are disposed of with permission to petitioner herein to make individual applications seeking transfer of contract from AIA...
m/s.bajaj Allianz General ins.co.ltd. Vs.m/s. Rama Service Station & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 + MAC APP1192015 & CM No.2437/2015 M/S. RAMA SERVICE STATION ....Appellant Through: Mr. Sashil Mongia, Advocate Versus GURDAYAL SINGH VERMA & OPRS. (BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R AND MAC APP. No.314/2015 M/S.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INS.CO.LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate Versus M/S. RAMA SERVICE STATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sashi Mongia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) At the outset, it is pointed out by learned counsel for the parties that this appeal has no relation with MAC.APP. No.1003/2016 and in fact, this appeal has to be heard along with MAC APP. No.314/2015. MAC APP. 119/2015 & 314/2015 Page 1 of 3 In view of the aforesaid, last order of 21st February, 2017 is clarified to the extent that this appeal has to be heard along with the Main Appeal being cross-appeal No.314/2015. A...
Meena & Ors vs.ram Kishan Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2018 MEENA & ORS RFA4512017 & CM APPL. 16370/2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K. G. Seth, Advocate along with Appellant/Ms. Meena Jaswant in person. versus RAM KISHAN GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Malhotra, Mr. Sachin Gupta & Mr. Sharad Malhotra, Advocates (M-9810294870). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 22nd February, 2017 by which a decree of possession has been passed against the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter referred as Defendant) in respect of the First Floor of property bearing Municipal No.52, measuring 170 sq yds, Lal Dora (1908-09) Abadi of Kalu Sarai, Khasra No.288/24Min, Opp. Azad Apartment, IIT Gate, New Delhi-110016.2. In brief, the case of the Plaintiff/Respondent (hereinafter referred as Plaintiff) is that by virtue of registered sale deed executed on 5th May, 2008 by the previous...
Lal Babu @ Sanjay vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May 2018 Decided on:31. t May 2018 + SUNDER PASWAN & ORS CRL.A. 1043/2013 .....Appellants Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu Bakshi Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra and Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State + LAL BABU @ SANJAY .....Appellant CRL.A. 1328/2014 Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu Bakshi Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra and Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Advocates. STATE NCT OF DELHI versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the common impugned judgment dated 3rd April 2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II (North- Crl. A.Nos.1043/2013 & 1328/2014 Page 1 of 28 West), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.38/2011 arising out of FIR No.115/2011 registered at PS Shalimar Bagh convicting the three Appell...
Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs.duet India H ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31st May, 2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 223/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms.Ananya Aggarwal, Ms.Shruti Sabharwal, Ms.Surbhi Lal, Advs. versus DUET INDIA HOTELS (HYDERABAD) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay, Mr.N.K.Sharma, Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the detailed order passed by this Court today in OMP(I)(Comm.) No.220/2018 and other connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed.2. A copy of the aforesaid order in OMP(I)(Comm.) No.220/2018 is placed below. NAVIN CHAWLA, J MAY31 2018 RN $~13 to 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31st May, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 220/2018 INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (THROUGH: ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATOR...
Financial Software and Systems Private Limited vs.the Competition Comm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2957/2015 Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2018 FINANCIAL SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMTED ........ Petitioner versus THE COMPETITION COMMISISON OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Ms Kalyani Singh, Ms Aakanksha Kaul and Mr Arrpit Shukla, Advocates. Mr Amitabh Kumar, Ms Vibha Dhawan, Ms Unnati Agrawal and Ms Diksha Rai, Advocates for R-2 to R-4. Mr Udayan Jain and Mr Kamal Sharma, Advocate for CCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER3105.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.20560/2017(recall of order dated 15.11.2016) 1. By this application, petitioner seeks recall of order dated 15.11.2016 of this Court and a direction that the subject Writ Petition W.P.(C) 2957/2015 Page 1 of 5 be restored.2.... Petitioner had, inter alia, filed the present Writ Petition impugning order dated 13.07.2015 pa...
Gulzar Md. & Ors. Vs.braille Library & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6283/2018 & CM No.24227/2018 Date of Order: May 31, 2018 1. GULZAR MD. & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. P K Sinha and Ms. Ritu Gaur, Advocates BRAILLE LIBRARY & ORS. versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners are differently abled who were aggrieved by treatment meted out to them in the Braille Library and in this regard, they had submitted a Representation (Annexure P-6) on 7th December, 2017 which was followed by a reminder (Annexure P-8) on 29th January, 2018.2. According to petitioners counsel, there is no proper response to the said Representation. Though, a challenge is laid to transfer order of 10th November, 2017, vide which second petitioner has been transferred from Braille Library to the University Librarian Office, but this Court is informed by petitioners counsel that in pursuance of transfer order of 10th No...
Rohan Gupta vs.state Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: May 31, 2018 W.P.(C) 5030/2018 & CM No.19388/2018 ROHAN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sadiya Rohma Khan, Advocate Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Kumar Jha and Mr. S L Gupta, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Manik Dogra, Ms. Mallika Hiremath and Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CM No.19386/2018 Heard on interim relief. Learned counsel for petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the Corrigendum (Annexure R-26 with the rejoinder) issued by Ministry of Railways. It is pointed out that specific learning disability is included in the category of persons with disability (hereinafter to be referred to as PwD). Learned counsel for petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to Staff Selection Commissions Notice (Annexure R-22 to the rejoinder) which includes specific learning disability in the category of PwD. W.P.(C) 5030/2018 Page ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »