Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surinder Kumar Grover vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Test. Case No.38/2000 & CS(OS) No.140/1997 + % 1. SURINDER KUMAR GROVER Through: Test. Case No.38/2000 Reserved on:19. h April, 2018 Pronounced on:25. h April, 2018 ........ Petitioner Ms. Kajal Chandra, Advocate with Ms. Prerna Chopra, Advocate and Ms. Viren Kapur, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate with Mr. S.P. Srivastava, Advocate for objector. CS(OS) No.140/1997 2. SATISH KUMAR & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate with Mr. S.P. Srivastava, Advocate. versus SURINDER KUMAR GROVER & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Kajal Chandra, Advocate with Ms. Prerna Chopra, Advocate and Mr. Viren Kapur, Advocate. Test Case No.38/2000 & CS(OS) No.140/1997 Page 1 of 33 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1.(i) By this judgment, two cases are being disposed of. Both the matters are consolidated in terms of the order dated 1.2...
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.advik Finance & Prop ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~67 TO70* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2162/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS % + + CRL.M.C. 2163/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 2164/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus ADVIK FINANCE & PROPERTIES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 2165/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C.2162/2018, 2163/2018, 2164/2018 & 2165/2018 Page 1 of 3 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Alok Kumar Singh & Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocates For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. JUDGMENT2504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.7691-7694/2018 (exemption)...
Sukhbeer Singh vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 4140/2018 & CM162852018 SUKHBEER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.S.C. Singhal, Advocate versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms. Pratima Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) By way of this petition, review of ACRs and consequent thereto, promotion as Deputy General Manager is sought by petitioner with retrospective effect and with arrears of pay.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that despite Recommendation (Annexure P-16) of the SC/ST Cell of first respondent made on 10th November, 2015, petitioner has not been promoted as Programmer from the year 2004, with consequential relief.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deem...
M/S Sam (India) Buildwell Pvt .Ltd. Through Its Regional Head and Ar K ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h April, 2018 ARB.P. 87/2018 M/S SAM (INDIA) BUILDWELL PVT .LTD. THROUGH ITS REGIONAL HEAD AND AR KARAN SAGAR AGGRWAL Through: Mr.Vivekanand, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S COSLIGHT INDIAN TELECOM PVT LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Kr. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement dated 8th August, 2009 executed between the parties.2. Clause 1 of the agreement incorporates the General Conditions of the Contract (GCC) as a part of the agreement.3. Clause 25 of the GCC provides for resolution of the disputes through arbitration. The relevant extracts from the Arbitration Agreement are a...
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~67 TO70* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2162/2018 Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS % + + CRL.M.C. 2163/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 2164/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus ADVIK FINANCE & PROPERTIES PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 2165/2018 NALANDA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C.2162/2018, 2163/2018, 2164/2018 & 2165/2018 Page 1 of 3 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Alok Kumar Singh & Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advocates For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for the State. JUDGMENT2504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.7691-7694/2018 (exemption)...
Raksha Rani vs.s.krishan Sharma (Deceased Through Lr) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h April, 2018 CS(OS) No.110/2010 & IAs No.873/2010(U/O.39 R.1 &2) & 9429/2016(filed by D-2) RAKSHA RANI .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Lokesh Chopra, Adv. Versus S.KRISHAN SHARMA (DECEASED THROUGH LR) & ANR. ...Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff instituted this suit against two defendants namely S. Krishann Sharma and Santosh Devi, for specific performance of an agreement of sale of basement, ground and first floor of property No.D-38, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi and in the alternative for recovery of damages of Rs.3.66 crores, pleading: (i) That the two defendants as owners vide Perpetual Lease Deed dated 21st May, 1976 of the land underneath the property, on 7th August, 2009 agreed to sell the said property to the plaintiff for a consideration of Rs.3.66 crores and on the other terms and conditions as contained in a receipt of Rs.6 lacs as earnest money. (ii) That tho...
Federation of All India Bhel Engieers and Officers Association vs.bhar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 25, 2018 W.P.(C) 4185/2018 & CM164552018 FEDERATION OF ALL INDIA BHEL ENGIEERS AND OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Pushpendra Kumar and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Roy, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) For the relief claimed in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-29) has been made by petitioner-Federation to first respondent on 21st March, 2018. Learned counsel for petitioner-Federation submits that there is no response to the said Representation.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with permission to President of petitioner- Federation to supplement the Representation (Annexure P-29) withi...
Shine Travels & Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bajrangi Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:25. 04.2018 W.P.(C) 329/2017 SHINE TRAVELS & CARGO PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Pandey and Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advs. versus BAJRANGI PRASAD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ataur Rahman and Mr. Sarefaraz Khan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 15.10.2015 passed by the Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948/Deputy Labour Commissioner, South West District, New Delhi by which the claim petition of the respondent workman against the petitioner for non-payment of minimum wages for the period 01.04.2014 to 30.09.2014 was allowed in exercise of its power conferred by Clause (i) of sub-section 3 of Section 20 of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (in short M.W. Act) and the petitioner management was directed to pay the difference of the minimum wages along with the compensation to the extent of W.P. (C) 329/2017 Page 1 of 4 five times of the diffe...
Vanguard Security and Fire Services (P) Ltd vs.m/s National Building C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h April, 2018 VANGUARD SECURITY AND FIRE SERVICES (P) LTD RFA6332016 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate (M- versus 9810412737). M/S NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.C. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 31st May 2016, by which the suit filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) for recovery of a sum of Rs.7,99,466.89/- along with interest was dismissed on the ground of being barred by limitation. Brief background 2. The Plaintiff was engaged by Respondent /Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) No.1 National Building Construction Corporation (hereinafter, NBCC) vide Agreement dated 30th May, 2000 for providing surveillance, fire fighting and other services as per the schedule of charges. The said agreement contained the follo...
Arun Bhati @ Annu vs.state (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.A.400/2016 & CRL.M.(Bail) 406/2018 Reserved on: April 06, 2018 Date of decision: April 24, 2018 ARUN BHATI @ ANNU Appellant Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Ms.Preeti Jakhar, Advocate versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. Mehta, J.: JUDGMENT1 The instant appeal is arising out of the impugned judgment dated 17.03.2016 and order on sentence dated 31.03.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Patiala House Court New Delhi in Session Case No.arising out of FIR No.2registered at Police Station Vasant Kunj, Delhi whereby the Appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life with a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in CRL.A. 400/2016 Page 1 of 18 default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment (SI) for three months....
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »