Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Lokesh Kumar Meena vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~45 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA. /2018 Date of Judgment:25. h April, 2018 DR. LOKESH KUMAR MEENA ..... Appellant Through Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Mr. Azaruddin Chaudhary, Advocates for the appellant along with appellant. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj,CGSC for respondent no.1./UOI. Ms.Biakthansangi Das, Advocate for Mr. T.Singhdev, Advocate for respondent no.2/MCI. Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate for respondent no.3/GGSIP University. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. We may note, at the outset, that this Bench has assembled at 9:00 A.M. today pursuant to the matter having been mentioned before the Honble Acting Chief Justice.2. Registry is directed to register the LPA and the applications. CM.APPL /2018(Exemption) 3.4. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. LPA. /2018 Page 1 of 9 LPA....
Jasbir Singh Chawla vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 04.2018 CRL.M.C. 2142/2018 JASBIR SINGH CHAWLA versus C B I ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Abhas Mishra, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Nikhil Goel with Ms. Gurpreet Hora and Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2504.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.7647/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2142/2018 & Crl.M.A.7646/2018 (stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 19.03.2018, whereby the application of the petitioner seeking summoning of the concerned clerk/official from the office of the Zonal Manager, Punjab & Sind Bank with the file of the prosecution with regard to grant of sanction CRL.M.C. 2142/2018 Page 1 of 3 has been declined.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the production of the file is ...
Ajit Ravi vs.delhi Jal Board & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~51 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1188/2018 & Crl.M.A.Nos.7206-07/2018 Date of decision :25. h April, 2018 % AJIT RAVI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Anish Chawla and Mr. Nitin Mehta, Advs. versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS Through : Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Devanshu Lahiry, Adv. for DJB along with Mr. Pankaj Atray, E.E., Mr. U.N. Singh, Z.E. and Mr. O.P. Sharma, J.E. Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Ashish Negi and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advs. for State. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Crl.M.A.No.7207/2018 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(Crl.)No.1188/2018 Page 1 of 4 W.P.(CRL) 1188/2018 & Crl.M.A.No.7206/2018 1. This writ petition has been filed complaining that the Delhi Jal Board has illegally issued work order No.161 to M/s Shiv Singh Construction Company on 31st March, 201...
Deepak Saxena vs.national Highways Authority of India Through: Its Cha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~35 * + W.P.(C) 4166/2018 & CM No.16355/2018 (exemption) DEEPAK SAXENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.M.C.Jha & Mr.S.K.Tripathi, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Ms.Kanika Tandon & Ms.Madhu Sweta, Advocates ..... Respondent ORDER2504.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24.01.2018, % 1. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, dismissing M.A.No.2450/2017, for seeking condonation of delay in filing O.A. No.1298/2017, and the consequent dismissal of the said application.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as a Manager (P&IS) with the respondent/National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) in the year 1999 and was promoted to the post of Dy.GM (P&IS) in the year 2003. Though he was eligible for the next stage of promotion to the post of GM (P&IS), in the year 2008, ...
National Highways Autnhority of India vs.m/s Intercontinental Consulta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:25. 04.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 265/2016 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTNHORITY OF INDIA........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Mr.Mukesh Kumar and Mr.Deepak Yadav, Advocates. M/S INTERCONTINENTAL CONSULTANTAND TECHNOCRATS PVT LTD versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Anish Dayal and Mr.Siddharth Vaid, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking to set aside the Award dated 10.6.2015 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The petitioner is a Statutory Body constituted under Section 3 of the NHAI Act, 1988. The petitioner entered into a Consultancy Services Agreement dated 28.1.2002 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Agreement') with the respondent regarding services for construction and supervision of 4- Laning and Strengthening of the Existing 2-Lane Section from Km 199.660 to Km 250.500 a...
Sobha Applied Dsp Private Limited vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 190/2018 & IA No.5634/2018 SOBHA APPLIED DSP PRIVATE LIMITED........ Petitioner Through: Mr Neeraj Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr Vaibhav Mishra, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Mr Chirayu Jain, Advocate. Mrs Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate along with Mr N.K. Singh, Advocate for DTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2504.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, praying that the respondents be restrained from proceeding ahead with tender [RFP Document No.DTC/ITD/404/2018]. floated for inviting bids to install 3775 GPS Devices in the buses under respondent no.3 (DTC).2. Respondent no.2 (hereafter DIMTS) was issued a mandate of respondent no.1 (hereafter GNCTD) to implement the Automatic Vehicle Locati...
Manjula Saha & Anr. Vs.maya Rani Saha (Sd) Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~3 & 4 * 3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h April, 2018 CONT.CAS(C) 836/2017 MANJULA SAHA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Ms. Aakriti Vohra and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates. (M:9811089104) versus MAYA RANI SAHA (SD) THROUGH LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Bindal and Mr. Anurag Bindal, Advocates (M:9999955947) with Respondent in person. 4 + AND RFA6082016 MANJULA SAHA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Vohra, Ms. Aakriti Vohra and Mr. Pranay Mehta, Advocates. (M:9811089104) versus MAYA RANI SAHA (SD) THR LRS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Bindal and Mr. Anurag Bindal, Advocates (M:9999955947) with Respondent in person. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Learned proxy counsel for Mr. S. K. Bhaduri, Advocate for Appellants/Petitioners appears and seeks discharge in the matter. Mr. S. K. Bhaduri, Advocate is discharged in the matter as Mr. Arun Vohra has CONT.CAS(C) 836/2017 & RFA6082016 P...
Ms. Manisha Sejwal and Ors. Vs.lt. Governor Through: Chief Secretary D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 25, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4231/2018 & C.Ms. 16566-67-68/2018 MS. MANISHA SEJWAL AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Mr. Tarun Kumar & Mr. Nikhil Patnaik, Advocates Versus LT. GOVERNOR THROUGH: CHIEF SECRETARY DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neeti Mishra, Advocate for Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners claim that they are working as Guest Teachers for the last 3 to 8 years and they have right to seek regularization of their service in terms of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Bill, 2017. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that a concise and composite Representation will be filed on behalf of the petitioners to third respondent- Directorate of Education within a week. If such a Representation is received by third respondent- Directorate of Education, then it be considered and decided within four weeks by passing a speaking order and the fate of R...
Mohit Narula vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h April, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 1885/2017 MOHIT NARULA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Mr. R.K. Arora, Mr. Sanjela Gupta, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State. Mr. K.K. Jha, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates for R-2 along with R-2 in person. ASI Sukhda, PS Uttam Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.258/2017 under Section 376 IPC registered at PS Uttam Nagar.2. In the above noted FIR the allegations of respondent No.2 was that she was earlier residing with her mother and brother and her marriage was solemnized on 11th May, 2005 with one Gaurav when she was aged 18 years. However, behaviour of her husband was not good and he used to beat her. Since 18th January, 2010 she has been residing with her mother and brother. On 7th July, 2014 she talked ...
Katyayini Paper Mills pvt.ltd. Vs.directorate General of Supplies & Di ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-25-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 04.2018 ARB. P. 359/2017 KATYAYINI PAPER MILLS PVT.LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Apar Gupta, Mr.Ravinder Singh, Ms.Garima Jain and Ms.Disha Gupta, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SUPPLIES & DISPOSAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Kamaldeep and Mr.Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advs. for DGS&D. Mr.P.S.Khurana, Mr.Gighati Sushant Gupta, Mr.Rajiv Mishra and Ms.Shruti Sharma, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking constitution of an arbitral tribunal to resolve the disputes between the parties.2. The case of the petitioner is that it was empanelled with respondent No.1(DGS&D) for supply of Maplitho Printing Paper on fixed rates as per a yearly rate contract dated 19.01.2016. It is also stated that DGS&D (General Terms & Conditions) is applicabl...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »